If Jow Forums worships Stallman so much, why isn't anyone here using an FSF-endorsed distro?

If Jow Forums worships Stallman so much, why isn't anyone here using an FSF-endorsed distro?

Why are most of you using stuff like Debian, Arch, Gentoo and Fedora when Stallman has said numerous times they're trash?

Attached: richard_stallman-620x465-100590280-gallery.idge.jpg (620x465, 45K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8BDm88o94nk
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

who gives a shit about the stalled man

Because yoy can't worship Stallman on Jow Forums without working wi-fi.

>Stallman has said numerous times they're trash
He never said this mean word, instead he discourage the use of some by having some blob that is non-free.

I do. I've used Parabola GNU/Linux-Libre for over a year now.

Attached: file.png (500x119, 16K)

FSF doesn't endorse Debian because it suggests you download non-free components to get your hardware to work instead of putting you in the GNUlag.

Why haven't they RYF'd the TALOS II?

same with Fedora because there's a non-free repository for it which iirc isn't even official and can't be reached by default

he is a false prophet, we're reformists now and worship Terry instead

probably because of the blobs required for the SAS controller and some other things I don't remember

I really woldn't like any kind of attention or "worship" from this place. Also something as free like that it's no practical for everyday use, and endorse something like that with that purism it's almost autism.

>If Jow Forums worships Stallman so much
It's a total farce.
According to a recent poll, less than 10% even use Emacs and most use an IDE or some Electron based shitshow

Attached: TGYC0Q2.jpg (480x451, 59K)

Stallman is no longer /ourguy/?

fedora has nonfree blobs by default and even stared recommending google chrome and other proprietary drivers in the latest releases. I would stay far away from fedora, but debian is fine.

Because stallman can be super fucking autistic about things like dynamic/static linking. His priorities are odd

Isn't Linux MX the better, non sysd version of Debian?

I think Stallman is retarded and I use emacs, where's my cookie

because i can still use only free software on a distro that doesn't enforce the requirement, but if i really need something nonfree, i don't have to break my back making it happen

i think devuan is an openrc variant of debian too

Because it’s a meme.

based

Are you sure?

His complaints about Debian are retarded even from a free software standpoint.

As long as your installation passes vrms, it's good enough. No need to go into esoteric distro territory for the vague purpose of GNU certification.

I believe in free software, but the man himself is a fucking joke, good for nothing but quoting in stale copypasta shitposts and laughing at his autistic mannerisms and childish tantrums pitched at speaking engagements in irrelevant, far-off places while he prances about in his absurd Jesus costume...

>where's my cookie
Somewhere in you browser

Is it good user?

i use Canaima GNU/Linux for the FULL COMMUNISM experience

Attached: 1528452513352.jpg (448x359, 64K)

Debian with no non-free repos is FSF approved.

I dont worship stallman though. Sure he's a great man, but I don't use Trisquel.

Is CANTV actually providing people with internet for once?

this

No it isn't? As long as people have the freedom to use non-free software, Stallman hates Debian.

He's literally only said that Debian is a good distro but he wouldn't recommend it to people who would have a hard time figuring out the free vs non-free stuff. If you're an informed power user interested in freedom, then he would advise that it's a good distro.
He just doesn't want to give a blanket recommendation to use Debian because people would incorrectly interpret it as an implicit endorsement of using Debian with nonfree.

richard stallman has something on his site about pedophilia that is suspect. i am surprised he hasn't taken that shit down

youtube.com/watch?v=8BDm88o94nk

Attached: 7554dea509cac2f498908a156324a08a.jpg (564x846, 55K)

mainly drivers. I'm unironically thinking of moving to hyperbola and using the aur to get wifi drivers and shit.

He's a "love is love" kind of crazy hippie. Luckily I've heard he limits his sexual encounters to nasal sex with flowers.

>Jow Forums worships Stallman
I wouldn't piss on this fucking piece of trash if he was on fire.

>for over a year now
Sorry to hear that

Jow Forums doesn't worship him all that much anymore. it's all about terry davis nowadays.

and parrots

/thread

Nice tripcode my man

This

Stallman actually has no problem what you personally use of you know how to avoid propriety software, blobs, etc.

he's a meme. nobody with a sane bone in his body really cares about what the Jew thinks.

I use GuixSD, actually.

The cynic philosopher Diogene was like him. Two degenerates.

>reading gpl frontpage source code
>realise the sacrifices they have had to make to commencialism and internet philistinism
yeah they only don't openly endorse
>actual linux distros
because they're 'compromised' by being too good to be allowed

>what is ethernet
i laff at you unstable speedlets

>as long as people have freedom
>it's not approved by Stallman

fuck you

Yes it is. It's the best out of all the FSF-approved distros. Just as good as Arch, plus freedom!

i like my operating system to work properly so i need nonfree drivers

You are part of the problem.

What do you even do with a machine that complies with this fat fuck's autistic ideals. Like, could you use it for work or something? Because having fun doesn't seem to be an option.

Attached: 1544896237191.jpg (292x261, 25K)