Do these have a name?

Also, what kind of retard sets true as 0 and false as 1?

Bash and most other shells with exit codes?

Exit codes are different. Booleans, on the other hand, are standardized.

Attached: 1459037284745.png (694x801, 83K)

>cout

based tralse poster
underrated

Attached: 1404168936983.png (694x801, 77K)

kek
e
k

Attached: 1406342141339.png (694x732, 118K)

Attached: 1406342198440 - Copy.png (694x670, 101K)

Attached: 1406342198441.png (694x670, 72K)

Attached: 1406342198442.png (694x670, 83K)

Attached: 1406342198443.png (694x670, 71K)

what is the origin of this?

Attached: 1519330507257.png (629x504, 36K)

tits or gtfo

Attached: 1544462344025.png (461x660, 62K)

Attached: 1544469570718.png (1080x1350, 2.6M)

What's wrong with that?

Honestly amazing.
Goes to show how much you can do with basic knowledge and ultimate autistic stubborness

Attached: 78b.png (628x592, 87K)

virginity

This is beautiful.

no, those denote an error code, 0 means "there was no error", a successful exit depends on the errorlevel being false

This one was the best one... the word "new" was the kicker. Anyone got the original link with the background on it?

>tralse
Muh sides

Attached: enc.png (839x646, 46K)

they're called CS graduate memes

>case 864:

lmao

Game of the year everybody.

What's it matter? Switches match cases in the same amount of time regardless of how many cases there are.

lmao you best be kidding kid

>yfw most of these execute faster

This is horrifying and beautiful at the same time.

Gaze upon this abomination in its totality: daniweb.com/programming/software-development/threads/440954/can-t-fix-error-in-my-program

Regardles of validity of this statement if you need thousands of switch cases at least they should be defined in a header file as proprocessor constants to make this code readable:
#define BULLSHIT_DOG 864
...
case BULLSHIT_DOG:
// do something

Do you think anyone would understand wtf is going on here a year after writing this code?

No, a crapton of ifs doesn't execute faster, in fact it's common to perform more computations simply to avoid ifs.

>mac user

lmao no wonder

>tralse

Attached: 1542690468871.jpg (310x326, 26K)

should have been "true, false, nonbinary"

What really niggles me is that 'true' ends up == 0 and 'false' == 1, which given the C's family inability to distinguish booleans from ints is so incredibly error-prone. Using such code is not only stupid, it would be outright dangerous given enough time.

Don't shit on Mac users; they develop FreeBSD.

If you guys thought tralse was bad, check this.
docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.office.core.msotristate

Attached: 20180815_22_48_50MsoTriState_Enumeration_Object_Library_Reference_for_the_2007_Microsoft_Office_.png (716x492, 17K)

I can't motivate myself to get back into programming,

I look at codewars problems and I just cant be bothered.

Should i learn a new language, would that help maybe?

Attached: Screenshot 2018-12-23 at 12.59.40.png (698x376, 277K)

wat

underrated

>tri state
>has 5 states
>only 2 are supported

Jeez, I need to take a shower now.

No way, only a cs retard would define the greater than relation with division. A math undergrad would use subtraction.

I use enums

Boi.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1164

There's a difference between states and booleans.

Fun fact, the pokemon games use an encryption scheme that does essentially this.

What's wrong with one-time pad?

This isn't OTP, it's 1000000 time pad

Look closely, it never utilizes i.

This. It looks completely useless.

Applying xor 1000000 times is the same as applying xor 0 times.

this dude writes horrible code and made a game out of it, oddly inspiring

Thanks, I should have read the code a bit more carefully, I just assumed it was xoring individual bytes.

No worries man, basically it's just xoring the pointers at the beginning of both arrays, this code would run and cause a segment fault AFAIK

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-state_logic
This is actually kind of interesting

Well, it looks useless, but we're not privy to what the xor function actually does.

Try doing something hard, something that makes you adapt your style. That's what helped me. Also, learning emacs made me focus if that's part of the problem

Actual brainlet here, what would be the appropriate alternative to this? I'm guessing it depends on the context, but what would be the standard way to go when you have these many choices?

>not being vim master race

I find mode switching retarded, the emacs system of C-#/M-# just works better with the way modern programs work and it's more efficient to learn.

oh i missed this

you would usually want this broken up into categories from my experience, so cases 1-150 might fall under enemy, while cases 151-250 might be in a different switch statement regarding only NPCs or something. also having just number define these cases is awful, at least have an enum list somewhere that can be referenced.
case DOG: is infinitely better than case 6969: //this is dog

that's my two cents

Obviously doing a bunch of aimless programming assignments like plotting trend lines or finding nodes in trees is going to be boring, no shit.
Decide on something actually tangible and fun you want to do instead, like a website or a web scraper or a game or anything, and commit to it.

Nothing wrong with this one, tbqh.

Bill Gates.

How would you make this better?

By "no", I assume you mean "yes"?
Bash does interpret 0 as true in boolean contexts. All you did was explain why.

Instead of using strings use enums and make a table of functions

t. boolean zenlet

t. uses 4 bytes to store true or false instead of 1 bit

Thanks.

My philosophy has always been to only use strings for user i/o. They're big and unwieldy.

pls be bait

Attached: dafaq.jpg (322x335, 54K)

It seems to use the x^=y style so that's what I was going off of

Ah ok

>It seems to use the x^=y style
Does it though?

Oops I looked it up, and usually bools are stored as one byte. That's still 7 bits wasted.

That's actually cool as fuck

In assembly, xor a,b is essentially a = xor(a,b)

It's even more of a waste to make a function for a simple one liner.

>that's assembly
I get what you're doing, but were arguing about hypothetical circumstances that don't exist.

Sorry, I was just trying to guess based on what I knew

i can only motivate myself to program when its something that i am going to actually use. i barely ever complete challenges because i get part way then wonder what im even making the thing for.
pick a piece of software you think is lacking in some regard and make a version that isnt, or simply pick a random piece of software you use often and make your own version then use your version instead so you are motivated to keep working on it.
learning a new language always helps too, i find learning a new language almost as fun as programming itself

>i find learning a new language almost as fun as programming itself
That be gay and useless.