If you had to use one existing OS for the rest of your life with no updates, what would you choose?

If you had to use one existing OS for the rest of your life with no updates, what would you choose?

Attached: 1538124241227.jpg (225x225, 8K)

Linux Mint 19.1

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 26K)

slackware

TempleOS

Windows, developers are crazy about backwards compatibility there
glibc in linux would get outdated in 2 weeks and you couldn't run anything

Slackware, Debian or some other long-term distro. If I don't get bleeding edge anyway, at least it would be stable af.

Easily OpenBSD.

TempleOS

macOS Mavericks (10.9.5

haha it looks like apu is wearing a santa hat :)

Attached: apu hat.png (169x323, 50K)

Windows 10
Try preventing updates, you can't :^)

CRUX but is cheating because I can download newer software anyway.

Pretty much these

Wondows 8.1 because it supports what w10 and w7 support already

And the linux scene is generally trash. A million distros instead of one solid OS. It's like they want Microsoft to win the market share for desktop

This.

Probably Ubuntu when it had Unity but I don't have to take this question seriously.

Server core, then run everything in vm's.
(you never said ONLY one existing os).

Win 7 Pro, 64 bit.

Yes because market share was and always will be the goal of Linux distributors

OS X 10.6.8

windows server 2003

Windows 7

Cause fuck windows 10s shitty UI and fuck every single unstable Linux distro that breaks after every single update

Based

TempleOS

Aesthetic.
You mean, the rest of the world would move on, but I'd stuck on the same release? I dunno. Anything source-based rolling release then, I'll circumvent the constraint that way.

Indeed.

windows xp desu.