Runnit or openrc?

So after some advice here I've decided to give Artix a chance.

Which non-systemd solution should I use: runnit or openrc?

Attached: elmpr58.png (721x972, 129K)

Other urls found in this thread:

wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems
forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,644.0.html
github.com/mayfrost/guides/blob/master/ALTERNATIVES.md#system-utilities
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

sysvinit

i'd rather use systemd

blue pilled

honestly I like OpenRC, but to be fair both are solid, consider that your boot will be slower but your memory footprint will also be lower

Systemd is free as in freedom

OpenRC is better imho.

I want reliability, bonus points if it self-heals on any kind of failure

sysvinit is the most reliable init by far

sysvinit isn't a choice on Artix

>unironically wanting to be edgier than Arch users.
t. Arch user

wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems
forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,644.0.html
In my own experience (or lack thereof) i've heard runit is by far the fastest booting.

sys
tem
D

shepherd

lol
gotta out-flex somehow

Runit > sysvinit > systemd > openrc

weird flex, but okay

t. voidnigger

why

>weird flex
bruh this is Jow Forums, having the best distro is a core flex

use alpine

Attached: images(7).jpg (124x93, 4K)

I do in my Docker containers :)
but that's it

honest question
what the fuck is a docker

LXC containers.
They run the same everywhere, so developers can use them to build locally and deploy to a different underlying OS.

It's follows the "Infrastructure as Code" mantra that many system/devops engineering organizations are adopting. You have a "Dockerfile" for the project, which is versioned and repeatable.

t. someone in that industry

runit is lightning fast, careful about "everything is a file" philosophy, and dom enough to force a safe shutdown any time I tap the power button - I'd have to completely fuck a runtime for that not to work. So yeah, long live runit

sounds like bloat

it's not as fast as bare metal, but there's a tradeoff like all virtualization.
Docker containers can be extremely minimal (from scratch), only containing a staticly linked binary. I'm talking tiny.
Bloat isn't too big of a concern. It's nice to be able to make a container and know it'll run the same on any host.

whats the point of dockers?

infrastructure as code
automation

which os you use right now?

Debian.

Friendly reminder runit and openrc are not init daemons but service managers. They do include an optional init daemon recently tho

Check github.com/mayfrost/guides/blob/master/ALTERNATIVES.md#system-utilities

s6 > runit > openrc >>>>>>>>> sysvinit >>>>>>>>> windows 7 > systemd

actually, runit is an init. Only OpenRC requires a separate init daemon.