Am I the only one thinking there's no point in 4K because there's no significant difference between it and full HD. I have a 4K TV at home and was just watching some movies in it which got me thinking: this ain't that different than full HD... Can't talk about 8K or 12K because I never saw anything in that resolution (other than the real world duh...). I'm hoping 8K and 12K do represent a significant jump in that respect, till then however, I don't see a point in any further upgrading to TV's, consoles etc that support 4K.
HD, 4K, 8K, 12k
Jonathan Martin
Other urls found in this thread:
www3.nhk.or.jp
twitter.com
Ian Jones
Its never going to be the jump from SD to 1080p , just like blurays were never going to be the jump from VHS to DVD.
All new TV's now come in 4K , so everyone will end up with 4k sooner or later.
Daniel Rivera
>there's no significant difference between it and full HD
said no one ever.
You have never seen a really good 4k video, have you now?
Joshua Powell
we need to progress to 576 megapixels, the "resolution" at which we see
Leo Bennett
>not watching movies in 8k full dome
what is this? 1910 again?
Josiah Price
Actors look weird with too much detail.
Grayson Thomas
If you didn't sit 15 feet away from a 40 inch TV you would easily be able to tell the difference.
Parker Robinson
Are you confident your source was actually 4K? e.g. a UHD Blu-ray?
Jayden Hernandez
I just run my gemu at 1080p60fps and will keep doing it until the end of times, 1440p, 4k, they're all too much of a meme or too expensive to get into and still get a consistent framerate.
Hunter Phillips
I agree with you, I use a 50" TV sitting really close to it and I don't see the need for higher resolutions as I'm not interested in the VR meme. The problem is that most "1080p" sources are crushed bitrate garbage