Ayymd needs 8.7GHz to match a 3.7GHz 8700K

>ayymd needs 8.7GHz to match a 3.7GHz 8700K
AYYMD IS FINISHED AND BANKRUPT

Attached: Screenshot_20181226_174550.png (1233x503, 112K)

Other urls found in this thread:

browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/singlecore
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-8700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2400G/3937vsm433194
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Wait, iMacs have Ryzen now?

>single core
heh, who needs multitasking, right goyim?

>35,686 multicore score
I literally do not believe this garbage

>Geekbench
kek

>single core

>geekbench

Attached: tommy laughing.jpg (1280x720, 42K)

please tell me someone actually decided to use ryzen on a hackintosh to cuck both Intel and actual mac users out of the number one spot

>Intcels need to use geekbench to justify their purchase
what a new low

> 8709MHz
Intel is finished

>ryzen
>8700 MHz
>mac
Wait, what the hell is going on here

>intelcope thread

>Ryzen 5 2400G
>8.7 GHz
Jesus, if that is on 14nm low power GloFo, just imagine the clocks on 7nm HP TSMC

>8.7GHz
the image says MHz....

t. dum dum

Nice bait, nigger

>8.7 GHz on 14nm LP

absolutely FAKE

>8.7ghz
Probably melted the chip. One time use. Kek.

Attached: 1300458780516.jpg (641x481, 84K)

browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/singlecore

I don't even...
probably someone activated the "inflate score for applel products" mode with this hackintosh.

>it's the red team! It's thrice as fast!

If true this image proves the cucking Kekbench is doing to AMD's architecture.

So, how do you cheat Goybench?

>dat multicore score

Attached: intel suicide shill.png (1070x601, 440K)

>intel
>single core score higher than multi core score
explain this

Attached: 1545853613836.png (1233x503, 127K)

Bigger bibeline :DDDDDDDDD

Must be it. Epic troll.

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-8700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2400G/3937vsm433194
*wheeze*

>It's another thread by CapSoc the Intel / MS Pajeet
Listen you faggot just stop. You're hurting Intel with your amateur grade shilling. People are thinking, shit, if Intel is so desperate to shill yet can only afford this tired Pajeet, they must really be desperate.

If any Intel people are reading this you need to stop your shills, they're terrible and it's just making you look even more desperate and panicky.

>intel
>lower multicore score than single core
great inverse scaling dumbshits. call me back when you make a modern architecture.

All these results have to be from LN2 suicide runs where the only thing tested was a single core overclocked to shit and the rest of the cores may have to be disabled/down-clocked to get the best clocks out of a specific core. They where never caring about multicore.
An 8700k for example should really be getting 6k or so in single core scores and close to 30k in mulitcore

Now here's a real world performance benchmark

For the tards: ryzen is so advanced it matches i7-8700K performance for less: clock frequency, heat, and power consumption while having 2 more cores for better multi-tasking/gaymen while streaming.

Attached: Comb10102018092249.jpg (641x2895, 423K)

I fucking love my 2700x

It's true.

Ryzen can't even hit 8.7GHz, you could put some effort in...

see

You're right. Running the OS X version of GeekBench automatically multiplies the result by a factor determined by the number of shekels received from Apple.

It's just really nice being able to run a lot of programs with no hitch with my 2700x. Haven't had any issues with any programs (or games) I use.