What Photo viewer to use Jow Forums?

FastStone

IrfanView

Attached: 1540130151600.png (249x249, 67K)

gthumb, relatively lightweight and has raw support.

use nomacs

Photos app and win photo viewer

FastStone.
I actually can't understand people who use Irfanview. It has a butt ugly icon and fewer features than FS, which also has individual icons for different extensions.

Attached: file.png (165x77, 4K)

I probably would if it had Irfanview's feature of a hotkey to copy (or move) a file to another directory. I like being able to sort the images I download by picking a directory, scrolling through them, and hitting F7-enter for the ones I want to put somewhere else. For that matter Irfanview not only has this, it has a list of directories, I can hit F7-1 or F7-2 or so on to send files off to one of several different folders.

This is the killer feature I've never found in a Linux image viewer. There was some KDE program that had it in a broken, half-assed form (you had to browse to the directory every time you wanted to move a file, it reset to $HOME every time), but that's the closest I've ever come.

It just works and I watched porn photos in it since 2000s, used ACDSee before that.

feh

You can do that in Faststone too.
Hit "c" to copy or "m" to move, it opens up a windows that allows you to pick your folder, including a history of your recent folders, a list of favorite folders and 9 custom folders assigned to keys 1~9.

Attached: file.png (911x600, 334K)

nomacs

FastStone

Windows: IrfranView
Loonix: feh

caca

FastStone. I was using IrfanView for many years before that. FastStone is just better overall, IMO. The only thing worse is that it's a tiny bit slower to start.

same here
i need similar for my loonix

What's Jow Forums using on [spoiler]Linux[/spoiler]? Overall I like Gwenview but it's annoying how it always takes a few seconds to start up even when it's just starting a second instance, feh starts up instantly but is too spartan to be a suitable replacement and it's annoying how you can only flip through the images that you told it to load in advance on the command line

This.

Nomacs and Viewnior. Some swear on mpv as image viewer, but I was never a big fan of that.

Same with music player.
Linux just don't have software.

>viewing photos

anything but text is a glow in the dark botnet

xnview on windows
whatever works on linux

Windows 10's default photo viewer is pretty fucking shit. I just might reinstall IrfanView, haven't used it since XP

Try qimgv it's pretty comfy.

Attached: 36.png (36x36, 296)

Nah, I just use LTSC which does not have the original Windows Photo Viewer anymore and does not support any UWP Apps so there is no Windows Photo App either. Infraview so far is pretty fucking comfy.

xnview mp

feh - cover display for ncmpcpp
gimgv - images in general also webms
ahoviewer - manga
imv - slideshows

qimgv* serry

Win: Impression Eyes
GNU: feh

Attached: fuminasuzuki05456945.jpg (2202x2900, 442K)

not only it is shit, it also logs every single file you open so microsoft can know exactly how many times you opened weird_butt_secks.png

The one in your picture.

FPBP
/thread

>I want the same thing as Photoshop
>Use Gimp
Every single fucking time. No, nomacs is complete garbage compared to irfanview.

>Linux fags download image viewers

Attached: FemaleTornAustralianfreshwatercrocodile-max-1mb.gif (280x210, 890K)

Irfanview is overkill if you only need it for viewing and/or printing.

>I actually can't understand people who use Irfanview.
Faststone is very inconvenient, and doesn't offer the same ease of use, and by that I mean quick access to functions.

To name a few examples:
Irfanview draws a selection box with the left mouse button by default, I need to press ctrl for the same thing.

There is no quick way for me to tell Faststone NOT TO smooth images when I zoom in. I want it to smooth images when I just want to view them, I do not want it to smooth the images when I am actually working with those images. I have to mess around deep within the options to toggle this in Faststone

When I select a custom area in Irfanview, the size of the selected area is displayed in the header. I get no size information for my selection and this is something I use very often to determine the hight and spacing between different elements I'm editing.

And this was only zooming and selecting a custom area.

If you only need something for viewing and printing, you do not need an image browser the first place and have no business being in this thread, just use your fucking browser.

Well, to each his own. I prefer the default of FastStone where L-click=zoom.

The selection features in FS are better and more detailed when you enter the crop mode (x).

Another fucking mode after tumbnail and browser. No thanks, I prefer a single user interface doing everything at once. I didn't buy a 34" inch screen for a program to subdivide basic tasks into retarded modes that make no sense at all instead of doing it all at once.

Windows photo viewer(the one from Windows 7. It's still on windows 10 if you dig a little)

Not to mention all of Faststone froze for 12 seconds in browser mode while it was generating thumbnails for 71 images. It's slow and convoluted.

??????????

>whatever works on linux
So nothing?

Irfanview 64bit + 64bit plugins

He's probably unironically using Windows Image and Fax Viewer.

That's no good. There are some 32 bit features that haven't been implemented in the 64 bit version, like the unicode support in file names.

ImageGlass is pretty neat and it has nice file icons for image types as well, which can't be said for IrfanView

Attached: imageglass.png (1010x753, 1.39M)

Mangameeya. It's technically a comic viewer, but it makes a better image viewer than any actual dedicated image viewers.

IrfanView, I've been using it for a long time and it still does everything I need it to do.

See above, I personally see no reason to switch from IrfanView as it works well for everything I need. I considered checking out FastStone and might do so at some point, but so far it hasn't felt like it would be worth the effort.

Can FastStone do things like convert between image formats and automatically search for the highest JPG quality which still keeps the output file under a specified size?

Have you tried something like option 2 (a registry file) from
tenforums.com/tutorials/14312-restore-windows-photo-viewer-windows-10-a.html
It fixed the issue on my work computer where I'm not allowed to run unknown executables but can edit the registry, lol.

It does something better. There is a slider at the save dialogue and you can adjust everything and see the output file preview with the projected output file size under it.

t. former irfanview user but now faststone user since 2 minutes

Well, it's good that it has something akin to equivalent functionality and the preview sounds like a nice idea, but I don't really think manually adjusting a slider until the projected size is correct is better than specifying the size directly and having guaranteed output under the number you punched in automatically.

Everything works fine for me and I can open giant nasa images.

Yea, it's convoluted as hell, I'll admit that.

You say that like that would be a big deal. Pic related.

Attached: lmao64bit.png (2561x1020, 1.36M)

Speaking of music players, sadly there's nothing on Linux that comes close to MusicBee, which imo by far the best one on Windows.

The person I replied to said no Unicode support like that's true, that's why the it works for me.
If you're talking about the images I wrote giant images, I meant that not some cut down jpeg but raw and tiff full size images.

That was also me. By unicode I meant kanji and other shit, basically what your typical anime image would be written in. I've read that in a direct comparison on the irfanview site a couple weeks ago.

And I have yet to see an image that a 32 bit irfanview can't handle.

Does anybody know which image viewer is best for how quickly it opens? I recall some autistic user documenting response times from image viewers but I forgot to save what he said. (Posted stats and everything). He stated irfanview was probably one of the slowest in this regard so I'm curious if that even holds true these days.

this, its noice

Faststone is faster than Irfanview IF you set it up to open images in windowed view by default. Otherwise it will hang until it generated all the thumbnails for all the images in the folder where you opened the image from.

The speed is negligible with small images though. I had to go up to 266 megabytes to notice a solid one second difference.

ristretto and display and cacaview

Attached: i_view64.png (1014x640, 546K)