Everything wrong with python in two lines
example = 'fuck'.upper
print(example)
>>>
print(example.upper())
>>>'FUCK'
Everything wrong with python in two lines
Evan Rodriguez
Nathan Sanchez
wtf is this shit real?
>this somehow became one of the most popular languages
Jeremiah Brown
Upper is a method you tard, line one was essentially you just stating a function pointer.
Why are all the threads criticizing popular programming languages populated with people who clearly can't program or read the docs?
Logan Morales
It shows how bad you are to:
- Read a doc
- Use a function
- Understanding messages on the screen
- And so on...
Gavin Campbell
much easy
very intuitive
wow
Ryder Lewis
This is also retarded though because you can do things like this
x = str.upper
map(x, list_of_strs)
In this case the function magically applies as you would expect. Example in OP should just be a function pointer to the upper function, not the upper function applied to a defined string.
Now following along tell me what should happen in the following example:
example = 'fuck'.upper
print(example)
>>>
list_of_strs = ['a', 'b', 'c']
print( list(map(example, list_of_strs)) )
Alexander Moore
It's not intuitive, it's documented. Stop expecting shit to spoonfeed you you fucking brainlet mongoloid
Thomas Russell
I thought you had a point, but turns out you are just retarded.
>>> example = 'fuck'.upper
>>> print(example)
>>> print(example.upper())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
AttributeError: 'builtin_function_or_method' object has no attribute 'upper'
>>>
I'm not surprised some dickhead learning python cannot into function pointers.
Christopher Richardson
obviously just a typo. It should be example().
Go rage over at faggot
Tyler Perry
>too much of a brainlet to know the difference between a reference to a function and the result of calling a function
>somehow this is python's fault