Intel destroys AMD with games
>Playing games like a child
isn't 6 core r3 territory now?
based
my phone has more cores than this shit. corelets rekt
>ps5 comes out
>immediately obsolete for any new games
nice
>no HT
Do you also tape 4 go carts together and brag about how your car has more engines than a Lamborghini?
What a retarded analogy. Do you get more work done working as fast as possible alone or if you hire more people to help you out?
not now, but in a couple months maybe
Within 2 years AMD has made Intel increase core counts by 50% just to compete.
There's nothing wrong in playing games.
But virtual casinos such as the modern AAA garbage, you need to be pretty darn retarded with your money to do such thing.
Wow, so for the low low price of twice as expensive I can get 5-10% higher framerate is mostly shit games? Truly I made the wrong choice and I will switch at once, thank you rabbi.
Posting anime memes on Jow Forums. You should be gassed like the rest of the Jews.
What a retarded analogy. If it takes one man 60 seconds to dig a post hole, how long would it take if you hired 60 men to dig that hole?
60 seconds
This is the anime website called 4channel
Go back to Jow Forums
i5-9600K is not good enough for modern games.
Assassin's Creed Odyssey will choke on it.
6 cores CPUs are out of date.
It's a fine analogy. Ever wondered why your phone lags running 1 app at a time while that i5 flies with a dozen open and no builtin background app killing?
Yes because computing is only doing the task of one man (or core) at a time
8 poozen cores are slower than 6 intel cores
>six threads
Ahahahaha. Enjoy your stutter.
>6 CORES
OH NO
>6 THREADS
OH NO NO NO
>NO HT
OHHH NONONO HAHAHA
>INTEL
HAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAA
>CAWADOODY
OH NONONOOOOOHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAGGGHHHHHHHHH AAAAAHAHAHAHHA
>A socket change a year keeps the goyim in fear
10nm will be ready to counter Zen2 I swear!!
...As long as you don't have anything else running in the background and pray for Windows not to start downloading/installing updates while you're gaming
based and redpilled
with Intelyou can only be bluepilled
AMD processors with more cores should theoretically be more future proof, although I have a feeling anyone who's posting here probably replaces their processor every 2 years or so.
These new processors are garbage. I'm just going to overclock my 2500K to 6.5ghz and carry on.
Oh look, ANOTHER Intcel cope thread.
>single-digit percentage improvement on one metric
>that boils down to "muh gayums"
>beaten in pretty much every other performance measure
>twice the price
The only thing being destroyed here is your credibility as a human being.
Sandy vagina at mid 4ghz is decent but it is the secondary support that lets it down compared to more modern chips. If your only concern is "muh vidya fps" then sure, a highly clocked 2600k (nyet on the 2500k) will keep you going but for anything else - meltdown and spectre lol - it gets royally ravaged by anything else you can buy today.
lmao i enjoy that you guys had to move from 4c/4t being suicide tier, but now it goes up to 8c/16t since the 9900 came out xD
Multiple cores do allow more work to be done at a time, but miltithreading comes with overheads that make the boost from using 2 threads a lot less than 2x depending on the task. Some tasks of course can't be multithreaded, and you just have to wait on one core to do it.
>6 cores, no HT
Plebeian shit.
To be fair all but the most tuned of linux or BSD deployments will run hundreds if not thousands - of effectively background tasks amd depending on the hardware involved this can consume a significaant or insignificant portion of cpu and memory resources before a given workload is factored in. Every OS scheduler is multi-threaded by requirement.
Still this doesn't mean you can just ignore single core speed and put lots of cores.
>Thinks games are for children
>Unironically posts anime
Shiggy
this. real grown up man use their pcs for anime and lolicore
>spectre
>meltdown
>implying his PC has anything worth exfiltrating on it
>implying it doesn't
I'm sure the NSA would be happy to find his 3TB CP collection
Jow Forums using computers for work.
Like precious shit.
First, if you use PC for work(as in real work), you really aint in the market for buying I9-####,I7-####,I5-####,I3-#### or R3,5,7,9- 2#00.
All you need is Celeron or Athlon.
Also, inb4 muh nuclear particle simulator with 99 cores and 177 threads and 88xRTX2080Ti, YouTube is not a job, Audacity is not a job, Sony Vegas is not a job, emulator is not a job.
Server-level CPUs are either Epyc or Xeon.
I#s and Ryzens are for gaming and bullshittery at home..
But that autist's idea of a cp collection is thousands of different versions of the UNIX cp program.
Who could be behind this post I wonder
I mean, winning in single threaded games by like 2% is pretty much the only advantage Intel has left.
I wonder what Intel fags will come up with next when Zen v2 beats them in that too.
On a more serious note, did it cross your mind that people didn't do real work on desktops because they were stuck with either 4C/8T gayming CPUs or fucking overpriced HEDT shit?
who?
It does depending on deployment. If you entirely bound by overall throughput (see: servers) low throughput cores means nothing if you can fit >1.x within a dice space of the competitor. Ultimately that is the downside of bulldozer due to Intel's node advantage but these days MOAR COARS with a relatively minor performance defecity means single core perforance is irrelevantr as your scaling is greater.
>watching cartoons like a child
My SRS BSNS workload demands plenty of ram (8-16gb) but fuckall cpu as its entirely based around excel sheets with shitloads of links and as such any cpuj vendor will do. While an upgrade is due next year (Q1) I anticipate IT department will roll Intel just cos. The side advantage is I get to yoink all the old machines and fuel my home NAS machine with it.
I was talking specifically about smartphones, a use case that is practically all about responsiveness, not throughput. Video encoding and decoding are the common throughout oriented and very multithreading friendly task for them, and they typically use dedicated hardware to accelerate it.
>Everything that isn't what I do isn't considered real work
OK fag. You're just poor.
ok, let me fill you into some history.
Back in ~+-2001 Intel released HT(or as you call them today: threads..), it was most expensive CPU with shittiest performance.
Amd released 64 bit x2 cores but without HT.
Almost 20 years later people adopted 6 to 8 cores and HT does not ruin performance.
But, tact stayed at 3Ghz(+-1ghz, but mainstream is still 3ghz).
Honestly, at this point I see more of future in fucking ARM(and I dont believe I'm saying this).
x86 is coming to it's natural end, gainz slowed down drastically in last 20 years, both companies use every fucking trick in the book to hide that fact .
Please, do tell when will you see program that uses 24 cores and 48 threads(and it's not Winrar or benchmark vaporware game/program that has 10 times better alternative ).
Also, I kinda do remember having more than 5 programs open waay back in a day with just 1 core@ let's say 333mhz..
So, saying that low core count stopped people to do "real work" is just flawed.
Trust me,theoretical 10Ghz CPU would do more job faster than this shitty route.
The semiconductor industry is a collusion. Nobody is advancing anything unless the gatekeepers allow it. You're delusional if you think ARM, RISC-V or whatever ISA is going to push things forward.
I think i'll be keeping my 3700 for a long time, it's not worth upgrading.
3770*
Ryzen is literally soi-tier for twitch panhandling e-thots.
Fuck off back to gaymerfag.
lmaoo playing video games? do something better with your life. loser
they jewed you out of hyper-threading
nobody asked you manchild
>waah stop liking things I don't like
This
Stutters don't matter
Intel is for poojeets and chinks
If you play at 240Hz, sure. But the moment you go any lower, Ryzen is either equal or good enough
T. Ryzen + Radeon + Freesync 144Hz owner
based post