>"yes, certain random combination of 0s and 1s can get you jailed"
"yes, certain random combination of 0s and 1s can get you jailed"
Orange man bad
post bad 1's and 0's
1010011010
011011110111001001100001011011100110011101100101 011011010110000101101110 011000100110000101100100
and being in possession of a certain combination of molecules can also get you jailed. what' s your point?
>still posting gayjaks
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
>random
Only theoretically. How probable is that random combination of 0/1s will
even spelll a threat to the president, for example?
"What is emergence?"
>YES, JAIL 'EM
orangemanbad
>"yes, certain random combinations of atoms can get you jailed"
fuck off closet MAP
01100011 01101000 01101001 01101100 01100100 00100000 01110000 01101111 01110010 01101110
>using certain tools to rearrange certain molecules in certain ways can get you jailed
fucking why life
what was the name of the fallacy for this called again?
pastebin.com/PK2ZtiE8
>Certian arrangements of certian things will get you jailed
it is not a fallacy. Just because you own a copy of a crime does not mean you committed it or are increasing demand for said crime. For example, if I had a gore video containing a murder and more heinous crimes, would I be accountable for that murder? Does me owning a copy increase the demand for more murders?
Law is not made to be logical or fair. Grow up.