"yes, certain random combination of 0s and 1s can get you jailed"

>"yes, certain random combination of 0s and 1s can get you jailed"

Attached: 1542296772972.png (500x539, 196K)

Orange man bad

post bad 1's and 0's

1010011010

011011110111001001100001011011100110011101100101 011011010110000101101110 011000100110000101100100

and being in possession of a certain combination of molecules can also get you jailed. what' s your point?

>still posting gayjaks

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

>random

Only theoretically. How probable is that random combination of 0/1s will
even spelll a threat to the president, for example?

"What is emergence?"

>YES, JAIL 'EM

orangemanbad

>"yes, certain random combinations of atoms can get you jailed"

Attached: npc.jpg (640x480, 33K)

fuck off closet MAP

01100011 01101000 01101001 01101100 01100100 00100000 01110000 01101111 01110010 01101110

>using certain tools to rearrange certain molecules in certain ways can get you jailed
fucking why life

what was the name of the fallacy for this called again?

pastebin.com/PK2ZtiE8

>Certian arrangements of certian things will get you jailed

it is not a fallacy. Just because you own a copy of a crime does not mean you committed it or are increasing demand for said crime. For example, if I had a gore video containing a murder and more heinous crimes, would I be accountable for that murder? Does me owning a copy increase the demand for more murders?

Law is not made to be logical or fair. Grow up.