Why aren't you using an FSS-approved distro like Trisquel?

Why aren't you using an FSS-approved distro like Trisquel?

You don't seriously believe Debian and Fedora are free, do you?

Attached: richard-stallman-100586957-primary.idge.jpg (620x413, 120K)

Debian is free by default, the fsf guidelines are very stingy and are only there to babysit you to have a completely free os including if your scared you might accidentally install something nonfree

Debian is literally the perfect distro for practical people and that includes people wanting to have a free system, just pay attention

Attached: dce.jpg (680x649, 34K)

Debian is free as long as you use the default repositories. FSF has issue with Debian because they host non-free software in the nonfree and contrib repositories. I think as per freedom 0, you should be free to do with your system what you wish, including installing non-free software if you want. I think a distro is less free when it goes out of it's way to prevent you from doing what you want (ie linux-libre).

I don't care about software freedom.

>I don't care about my freedom
good goy

Debian is for the enlightened, based and redpilled.

I have Trisquel installed on my Thinkpad x131e but my daily-use x200 has Debian.

Attached: image.jpg (2064x1457, 976K)

install guixsd

Attached: guixdouble.png (814x576, 257K)

There's a common misconception I'm seeing on your post, that if an operating system doesn't provide it for you, then they are preventing you from getting it. They aren't. Under all of the FSF endorsed distributions, you can run the worst botnets imaginable and they won't stop you. The difference is in whether or not they, personally, will provide you with said botnets.

>You don't seriously believe Debian and Fedora are free, do you?
No, and they're miserable enough to prevent me from using them or anything that is "Free-er".

>Debian is literally the perfect distro
systemd

Nuff said.

this
hipster non systemd bloatnigger

I bet you run fucking devuan and use XFCE.

Because i only care about it being free like free beer.

I don't like or agree with the FSF obviously.

This but also open source.
I prefer OSS to FLOSS too.

Attached: 1546151651669.png (687x696, 24K)

Yes you do, we all do.

See

Debian is more free than trisquel, Debian gives the user the option to install non-free sofrware, Trisquel forces the user to manually install it himself if he wants non-free software.
Debian doesn't force the user to instal non-free software by the contrary Debian makes sure the user wont install non-free software accidentally by requiting the user to enable a separate repository to do so.

On Trisquel you can't even install it yourself because you need wifi to download the software so you get stuck in that old computer paradigm of needing internet access to install drivers and needing drivers to access the internet.

Yeah you do, no need to deny it honey.

I guess I'll just have to live with you not believing me. On new years day too.

We don't care about Stallman anymore.

KYS.

RMS is God.
Suck his dick, shithead.

I had a homo erotic dream about stallmam the other night

Why?

>non systemd
>bloatnigger
user stop that's retarded
not everything is a meaningless buzzword for you to throw around

Are you a parrot?

debian is free, it just also gives you the freedom to choose to use unfree packages if you want.

Reminder than FSF and hypocritical liar stallman wouldn't approve OpenBSD as a free distro because of nonfree software in the ports tree, when the FSF contains instructions about how to install software on the nonfree operating system Windows on their website

Slimy hypocrites

Gentoo is just as free as "FSF approved" distributions, except it doesn't prevent you from installing nonfree sofrware/firmware if you need it.

Debian is broken by design. Something as simple as installing multiple versions of the same package leads to apt dependency hell.

Correction, shouldn't have used distro of course and my shitty spelling and expression is a result of tiredness.

OpenBSD has way worse problems, such as a cuck license that profits botnets and proprietary software corporations.

>blobs in the kernel
>free by default

You think forcing people who use your software to licence it to others on your shitty "gimme back code" terms is somehow more "free" than the BSD licences? It's actually extremely restrictive.

That's completely retarded. The whole copyleft concept is retarded. What else could you expect from a socialist though, who hates free enterprise and commerce

You are not required to "give back", that's FUD companies push. You just can't re-license the program, or a modified version, under a different license (which is what proprietary software using that code usually does).
Apple for example pretty much lives off FreeBSD.

Non-copyleft licenses help companies cuck you with more proprietary software. Fact. That's why they are pushing all these "X loves Open Source", so they can get free labor.
Don't play their game. Release your software under the GPL or AGPL.

And yes, BSD-style licenses ultimately end up being more harmful to user freedom, since they cause more proprietary software to proliferate.

debian has no blobs in the kernel dumbass

> AGPL
Not him, and I'm on your side, but AGPL goes too far in my IMO. Copyleft should only extend to copies you distribute to others, on whose machines you expect them to be run.

Debian is free because it respects my freedoms to download proprietary software

All I care about is running my games but not using Windows. I love Linux, but I don't necessarily care about all the things Linux advocates care about.
With Linux gaining in popularity (although I've been using it for a decade), we have to accept that some people will simply choose Linux because of how it looks.

Although against her principles, you could marry a feminist because you like her tits and ass.

I don't know if Linux will every dethrone Windows, and I don't really care, but we have to accept that a flood of new users will come with people who use Linux for their own reasons.

because fuck communism

Attached: socialistgas.png (793x794, 273K)