2019

>2019
>being a 1080p peasant

Attached: 1080pmeme.png (500x563, 124K)

>calling 1920x1080 "1080p"
>using tv aspect ratios for your computer

>calling 1920x1080 "1080p"
That's literally what it means though.

>literally
no

Below a screen size of around 100 inches, you won't notice the difference between 1080 and 2160p content.

>not being part of the 4K masterrace

Attached: donttrustspeccytemps.jpg (1320x904, 107K)

I'm still using a 720p TV. It's not like there was actually TV content for 1080p or above anyway.

>displaying 1080P signal on a 4k panel
Found your problem, nigger.

Nice CPU and GPU temperatures. Surely worth all the 4K goodness.

sorry im poor

>you need to consume! buy the newest shiny thing, goyim!

video nerds on avs forum swore to me i should hang on to my plasma since nothing better has come out yet. i finally saw a sale on a sony 4k lcd 65" and it looks fan fucking tastic. so sharp, punchy and colorful. no regrets.

>falling for le 4k meme
>not 144hz
also
>103 fucking degrees

*zooms past you* It's all about 8k now. Back to the nursing home, gramps.

Attached: 1546355535900.png (378x370, 120K)

Nice blur, winfaggot.

>Why make one pixel out of one pixel when you can make one pixel out of four pixels?

Attached: 1534082206382.jpg (400x400, 19K)

This. Shaming people who having a "lesser" product than you have helps no one, you're basically a shill for technologies.

nope

Attached: Speccy.png (1449x1074, 668K)

>tfw my dad fell for the 4k meme despite only watching 576i MPEG2 garbage

1080 is the height, "p" is for progressive and should be followed by a framerate
ex. "1080p60" or "720i50"

Um yes, buy the newest and most expensive graphics card you can afford.

Attached: 4kjewnvidia.jpg (3840x2160, 1.37M)

honestly can't say there's that much of a difference between 4k and high-bitrate 1080p movies on 27" 4k. It's not that noticeable. I find the difference to be huge for all kinds of computer desktop use, though, my old 27" 1080p monitor seems horrible in comparison.

>being autist

Are your eyes really that bad?

>have two monitors
>one is 1920x1080
>other is 1600x900
>prefer to use the 1600x900 one for games and just put my terminal or web browser on the 1920x1080

1920 is 2019 scrambled

I've used a 1280x1024 monitor until 2017 and only made the switch to 1920x1080 because I got a new computer
I'd still be using the same monitor if newer graphics card came with vga/dvi

The human eye can't see more than 1366x768. Enjoy your placebo resolutions

Attached: 1542906409640.jpg (240x219, 16K)

My eyes are fine, hows your brain doing?

Wrong. The human eye can't see more than 640x480

So Terry was right afterall?

Attached: JoJosh_H1GB.jpg (103x103, 5K)

I still use 1200x900.

terry was always right, since he was only a mouthpiece for god's divine intellect.

>Using a digital resoulution that your eyes are physically incapable of properly witnessing under pretty much any normal circumstances, then going on the internet to try to start a pissing contest.

BTFO bitch nugget.

8/10 decent troll

So what's better? 1080p at 144hz or 1440p at 60hz?

My desktop monitor's a 20" 1680x1050 display. Now that I'm building a new machine I'm getting a 21:9 curved monitor

for games 144hz definitely imo.

The best thing you can do currently if you have the money is get a 4k 144hz monitor, that way you can browse on your desktop at 4k and play games at 1080p or 1440p closer to 144fps

Ok I'm on a budget atm so I'll stick with a lower resolution.

jokes on you, i am on 1366x768.

Attached: 1494097419845.jpg (640x800, 190K)