ZEN 2

>3.9 base on 16-core
That's absolutely fucking bananas.

AMD now has HIGHER single threaded performance than intel at the same frequency. This is why a 2700X is able match an i7-8700K.

Attached: Comb10102018092249.jpg (641x2895, 423K)

The 1950X has a 3.4ghz base clock with 16 cores. Hitting 3.9 isn't exactly crazy, its pretty mundane for what this much of a process shrink should enable.

Face it, it would be the most hillarious outcome

Press F to pay respects to 9900K owners

Attached: 1433875832162.jpg (530x444, 67K)

This AMDick is gonna rape intcels so hard, they will be bleeding vulnerabilities for months

Worst thing russian webaite just copy rumors for SEO.
Best thing BTFO Intel.

Its probably the case that somebody just copied rumor specs and put it on their site, it happens pretty often. Even Videocardz does it, and then other outlets repost it, its a whole vicious cycle.
The thing is though that the rumored clocks and core counts for the CPUs are pretty tame, aside from the turbo, though a single core momentary XFR clock of 5ghz definitely isn't impossible.
A 16 core part moving from 3.4ghz in 14lpp to 3.9ghz in 7nm hpc isn't very shocking.

>completely different socket

The socket doesn't matter when you're looking at the high level arch and how it clocks at a given power level.

That 3700x makes my dick so fucking hard.

If this is true the 3600x alone would already obliterate anything Intel has to offer, why go even further? Is this genuine bloodlust?

So should I upgrade to AMD in 2019? I have a 780 ti and i5 4690K

Don't fall for AMD lies just buy Intel

We're all just circlejerking over 'leaks', wait for CES announcement for possible confirmation of Intel's or AMD's suicide.

Yeah you should

*kvetching intensifies*

I mean I'll wait for the benchmarks first, obviously, but do you think AMD will actually be able to compete with Intel/Nvidia this year?

AMD will never be able to compete with Intel

I don't know about nvidia, but they will certainly fuck intel up

*wearing manischewitz intensifies*

>certainly fuck intel up
What makes you say this?
>don't know about nvidia
I would assume with them releasing 7nm GPUs they would be able to compete with Nvidia?

Nothing beating nvidia, not this quick with the big lead they have(ignoring price). Intel on the other hand has been stuck on the same 14nm++++++++ for years. If AMD can't beat them now when they are this close in performance and with a node jump, they would be the laughing stock of the world for years.

>seething incel user
this is going to be a good year

Seething AMDrones you're days are numbered

>Intel expanding into explosives market
G-guys I'm scared, what if they really snap?

Attached: 1544496418866.png (360x361, 70K)

>hehe seething
>(insert company name here) drone
>incel
>wojak edit #6904 posted yet again
>noooo (insert company name here)bros
go back to /v/ you pieces of shit

Attached: 1374032485605.webm (450x472, 1.44M)

What do you mean expanding into? Intel made the processors for Tomahawk missiles. They've been experts in controlled explosives for decades.

>confirmed
Left disappointed - again.

Attached: 1426390486933.gif (280x210, 1.41M)

t. 9900k buyer

>Nothing beating nvidia, not this quick with the big lead they have
So you're telling me I'll to buy a fucking 2080 if I want to play Cyberpunk 2077 with max settings this year? I was really hoping the AMD 7nm cards would be able to compete.
>has been stuck on the same 14nm
I'm assuming they haven't bothered to innovate when their competition is shit?
So you believe AMD will dominate the CPU market this year?

Cope

thank you based amd

Attached: ryzen.jpg (600x600, 62K)

>seething incel user #2

>I was really hoping the AMD 7nm cards would be able to compete.
Navi isn't targeting some etherial high-end.
>I'm assuming they haven't bothered to innovate when their competition is shit?
They just fucked up.
There's no "haven't bothered" in semicon.

>I'm assuming they haven't bothered to innovate when their competition is shit?
Then why did nvidia keep advancing?

Nvidia isn't relying on in-house manufacturing.

>gpu
Wait for CES, AMD could announce something on par with 2080. Even if it's too hot again, should at least force Nvidia to lower prices.
>cpu
No way in hell is AMD NOT going to dominate this year. As I said, unless Intel pulls some 'secret sauce' out of their ass, AMD would be laughed out of existance if they failed to dominate now.

>5Ghz boost
It's over intel, AMD has the high ground.

>advancing
>implying RTX isn't 3.5 v2.0

Attached: 1524401806646.jpg (431x450, 39K)

>Wait for CES, AMD could announce something on par with 2080. Even if it's too hot again, should at least force Nvidia to lower prices.
It can't be too hot because it goes into the new consoles.
150W sloppy bin tops.

More like GeForce3 2.0: electric boogaloo.

LMAO WHERE ARE THE ADOREDTV SHITTALKERS NOW?

Attached: 1545957208137.jpg (2560x1440, 539K)

>gpu
Hopefully we at least get a price cut, the current GPU prices are insane.
>cpu
I don't quite understand, won't both Intel and AMD release a new CPU in 2019? Why would it necessarily mean that AMD will dominate?

too fucking crazy if true
I'll buy a whole other PC

Getting their scripts ready for tomorrow

the RX 3080 will be 150W

>Hopefully we at least get a price cut, the current GPU prices are insane.
They're the cheapest in 2 years.
>Why would it necessarily mean that AMD will dominate?
Are you retarded or >merely pretending?
Jow Forums has been /v/ with phones for a while, but you're extra dumb.

>some ruskis fill out their placeholder pages
>with the (almost certainly fake) adoredtv "leaks"
>"confirmed"

Attached: 1360136862945.gif (140x140, 1.27M)

>I don't quite understand

why are you even here?

Which is the sloppy top bin.
Pretty much this.

This. Note how the launch page in the video is gone - only the direct links remain.

Looks like they aren't even waiting for tomorrow.

AMD isn't using off the shelf CPU and GPU dies for the consoles. Each client will have their own accelerators they want added in, they'll each have proprietary IP that will go on die. AMD will have designed a specific die for Sony and one for Microsoft.

Hitting 5ghz for the XFR state would be a big PR win

>They're the cheapest in 2 years.
Well I bought my GPU in 2014, so I haven't been checking in on prices until very recently.
>Are you retarded
Assume that I am and explain, I'd appreciate that.
>why are you even here?
Mean.

the 2700X gets caned in gayming according to steve's benchmarks. i assume gn isn't bullshit. dropping the 3700x into my x470 asap.

>So you're telling me[...]
Only if plan on playing on 4k. A 1080 max all games on 1080p at the moment. As will a Vega 64. The 2080 is not a new paradigm in performance. The 2080 ti is. It's almost a decade now that there hasn't been an affordable high end GPU. There's no going back now.

>AMD isn't using off the shelf CPU and GPU dies for the consoles
They pretty much do.
OG PS4/X1 are modded Pitcairn, midlife kickers are modded P10.
PS5/X2 will use modded Navi10.
Fuck off.

Not even remotely close, this is /v/ kiddie understanding of things.
None of the console APUs are directly based on any discrete GPU. Each one is a custom die that was built to order, each contains proprietary IP from Sony/Microsoft, each contained IP from AMD that was a newer than anything currently on market upon release.
The PS4 and Xbone were Sea Islands family GCN when the only cards on the market were Southern Islands. The CPU clusters have features not seen on the consumer market until Beema launched.

AMD isn't just putting a slapped together MCM using generic CPU and GPU dies into the consoles. Semi-custom as a business model always entails some degree of custom design work that precludes the use of totally off the shelf stock components. It is IP blocks that are reused, not already completed dies.

Attached: ps4 chipworks.jpg (640x618, 109K)

Is TR on the same release cycle?

I can't go back to dual channel.

>None of the console APUs are directly based on any discrete GPU
The GPU config in Liverpool is literally based on Pitcairn.
>each contained IP from AMD that was a newer than anything currently on market upon release.
7th gen launched together with the rest of GCN2 products.
>The CPU clusters have features not seen on the consumer market until Beema launched.
We aren't talking CPUs, stop moving the goalposts.

There's no way this is real. This can't be happening.

Attached: 1543586263616.gif (332x332, 2.65M)

If I hadn't been saying the exact same thing since the "leaks", you'd probably have a point. But you don't.
t. AMD user back to 386DX-40

NOOO HOW COULD HARDWARE UNBOXED DO THIS TO US BROS

Attached: 1527021023538.jpg (267x297, 18K)

TR is always later.

>Fuck off.
Why so rude?
So I should buy a 1080 ti even though it's an old GPU? My 780 ti can still tie me over for a while but would like to upgrade in the not so distant future.

Do any of you actually believe this bullshit?

Attached: 1546277762236.jpg (1000x750, 168K)

I didn't believe the bullshit leaks on Rome topology until it was real, so maybe.

It isn't "literally" based on Pitcairn, you /v/tard. The PS4 and Xboner have instruction set support and whole feature sets not present in any Southern Islands GPU. These APUs were put into mass production in 2012. They had newer IP than any card on the market from AMD when they launched.
The physical layout of the CU being similar does not mean one is based on the other.

FUCK RUSSIANS
FUCK AMD
FUCK PAJEETS
FUCK SCHIZOS

and most importantly,

>It isn't "literally" based on Pitcairn, you /v/tard.
It pretty much is.
Should I bring you block diagrams for both or you'll stop voluntarily?
>These APUs were put into mass production in 2012
They weren't.
>They had newer IP than any card on the market from AMD when they launched.
Both Hawaii/Pitcairn and Liverpool were GCN2, so.
>The physical layout of the CU being similar does not mean one is based on the other.
That along with FF hardware and memory setup makes GPU a GPU.

These gains are too high for a node shrink like this. Isn't there some maturing before gains this drastic are realized?

>These gains are too high for a node shrink like this.
Why?
>Isn't there some maturing before gains this drastic are realized?
N7 has been in HVM for a while already.

No. And these daily "confirmations" that are just cut-paste from the original leak don't fill me with hope. The final nail in the coffin is AMDs own deafening silence - hopefully that part changes at CES.

>The final nail in the coffin is AMDs own deafening silence - hopefully that part changes at CES.
Lisa literally told you to expect exciting new products there at CES.

>hurr durr these things look the same so they're exactly the same
They look similar on their top metal layer, they are not the same. One is not based on the other. Southern Islands does not have Sea Island features, those features have hardware implementation, that means there is a fundamental difference in their routing and metal stack.
Don't try to talk out of your ass, /v/tard. These console APUs were in mass production in 2012. None of their GPU components is based on any discrete card.

Attached: 2ptv0pz.jpg (627x354, 95K)

No, she didn't. I don't actually know Ms Su, and don't hang out with her socially or otherwise. She's also not left a voicemail on my phone, or sent me a singing telegram.

>AMD didn't confirm the leaks that would take the wind out of the sails of their big announcement

gosh I wonder why

Attached: 1543852886126.png (817x443, 34K)

>They look similar on their top metal layer, they are not the same
I can't believe different SoCs have different metal stacks!
>Southern Islands does not have Sea Island features, those features have hardware implementation, that means there is a fundamental
PS4 (Liverpool) launched together with 200 family, so, same R&D cycle.
It still has the core config of Pitcairn.
>Don't try to talk out of your ass, /v/tard. These console APUs were in mass production in 2012.
They weren't.
Ditto for Hawaii.
>None of their GPU components is based on any discrete card.
Liverpool GPU config is based off Pitcairn.
I'll let you count the ALUs yourself.
She did, in recent interview.

Nah you're good. Oc the CPU, maybe upgrade GPU.

I have no idea why does this retard call everyone a /v/tard, but he's probably mentally I'll so I'll let him be.

Dont underestimate the shill's power

Funny how this wasn't a consideration in the original Zen launch.

>hurr durr the physical layout is similar so they're the same
Alright, were' done here, /v/tard. Keep on talking out of your ass.

You're trying to argue against objective reality. Theres no point in wasting my time trying to inform a dumb little kid.
The console APUs were in mass production in 2012, and as such the final production dies bare a 2012 date in under their cap.
Semi-custom means semi custom. AMD isn't using off the shelf dies in an MCM for the upcoming consoles.
You'll keep being wrong and the world will keep spinning.

They had no CPU products worth mentioning during the original Zen launch.

>maybe upgrade GPU.
Problem is AMD is shit and Nvidia is overpriced.
>Nah you're good. Oc the CPU
My CPU is already bottlenecking my GPU when I'm playing The Witcher 3, I have it clocked at 4.2.

>Alright, were' done here, /v/tard. Keep on talking out of your ass.
Look at this mental illness.
>The console APUs were in mass production in 2012, and as such the final production dies bare a 2012 date in under their cap.
The actual volumes for both of console SoCs plus Oland/Hawaii are 2013.
>Semi-custom means semi custom. AMD isn't using off the shelf dies in an MCM for the upcoming consoles.
They're reusing their configs, which is what I was talking about before your very fun spergout.
Did you forget to take your Adderall?

>slav site copies rumors
This has never happened before in the history of tech.

Attached: 1324143297839.jpg (400x350, 43K)

How can you tell it's the CPU? I'm pretty sure that GPU was neutered by driver updates.