Is it true all cpu's made after 1996 have a cia/nsa backdoor?

Is it true all cpu's made after 1996 have a cia/nsa backdoor?

Doesnt that mean proxies vpn etc etc are all irrelevant?

Attached: image.jpg (706x684, 64K)

Other urls found in this thread:

kiwifarms.net/threads/jonathan-yaniv-jessica-yaniv-trustednerd-trustednerd-com-jy-knows-it-jy-british-columbia.49790/
libreboot.org/faq.html#amd
libreboot.org/faq.html#intel
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Yes.
Yes.

No.
No.

Maybe.
Maybe.

yes.
yes.

Highly likely everything is backdoored.
On the other hand, have you ever seen the government act competently?
The CIA nigs can only handle so much. Especially because they're no doubt slacking off too.

Attached: Dgy6yWa.jpg (1900x2851, 463K)

There are exceptions up to and including the core 2 era. Protip: chipset. Nothing after 2009 is safe though.

pretty much, but they always have been. They're only good for circumventing region blocks or for piracy.

Yes
Maybe

You mean like Spectre? (Backdoor or incompetence? At that level does it even matter?)

I think some of the cpus survived untill ~2006

Yeah if your pc is connected to the internet its accesable by the glow niggers

Yes, governments are highly incompetent but they are storing every piece of data, which can be used at the point where technology is advanced enough to compensate.

Also, quantum computers will make searching all that archived data and even breaking cryto, completely trivial.

Not if you use the POWER9 CPU

1996 seems like a bit of a reach for CPUs but network cards probably have been. Interesting how wireless drivers are almost always proprietary blobs. They're one of the few closed source drivers you need for a GNU/Linux system. Now why would that be?

Attached: 1544006117383.png (689x610, 158K)

Everyone has been bugged since computers became powerful enough to access and organize vast amounts of data. Landline phones use only about 22 kb/s. I think they could bug anyone from when telephones became a thing, and East Germany was the trial run to monitor everyone. Watch 'The Lives of Others'. Modern computers make it less labour intensive.

Attached: 75dcbf47-eba4-4cba-b487-a76474c7cd67.png (555x763, 1.28M)

Oy gevalt! The goyim know! SHUT IT DOWN!

Security isn't all or nothing, you know.

Yes but a more important question is what the fuck is that picture?

If you're using internet you are not user anymore user , get over it already

Attached: IMG_20181230_233607_674.jpg (720x1184, 271K)

Jonathan Yaniv, a fucking leaf

>implying it isnt intentional

kiwifarms.net/threads/jonathan-yaniv-jessica-yaniv-trustednerd-trustednerd-com-jy-knows-it-jy-british-columbia.49790/

the way I see it is that the hardware backdoors are inconvenient for them to use to spy on us. After all, they did have to pay Microsoft to build a spyware OS and force everyone to update to it. If the IME was good at spying they wouldn't have to do this

What OS do you use, out of curiosity?

Depends on your threat model.

FreeBSD or Linux. They're still not completely secure but they're the best we've got right now. We still need secure processors.

good thing there no powerful quantum computers in existence.

lol

Yes
Additionally, everything made by Intel has built-in killswitches in case the Israelis want to shut it down. Not even joking.

>Is it true all cpu's made after 1996 have a cia/nsa backdoor?
No. Most of them probably have undisclosed vulnerabilities that could be used to backdoor your system but that's a little different. Intel started putting a low level co-processor in all their chips around 2006 called the Intel Management Engine. It acts as a hardware hypervisor for the main CPU cores, and it's networked either via it's own network stack through the AMT firmware modules, or it can hook into your OS network stack with a kernel driver that's available on Linux, Windows, and probably MacOS as well. The IME handles other things like TPM emulation, which most definitely makes hardware backed encryption useless on Intel systems without a real TPM. Then there's the AMD Platform Security Processor, which is like the IME but without networking (as far as we know). It still poses a localized threat.

If you want non-backdoored hardware that's not vulnerable to all that meltdown bullshit, start buying simple hardware. You can't do as much with it but it'll still do work processing and maybe basic web browsing. There are lots of ColdFire (simplified m68k) and MIPS based SBCs out there. Your mileage may vary with ARM systems, since those have all sorts of crap like TrustZone now.

>Doesnt that mean proxies vpn etc etc are all irrelevant?
Yes. The internet is completely insecure. Keep all your important data on a network isolated machine with no networking hardware in it at all.

This.

Attached: 1546366666778.jpg (1024x576, 81K)

~2006 CPUs got operating systems with backdoors.

Some background:
libreboot.org/faq.html#amd
libreboot.org/faq.html#intel

Don't call the IME firmware an operating system. An operating system can be wiped and removed, and operating systems are able to run user programs. The IME firmware has none of these qualities, which makes it far worse than any operating system.

this is what (((they))) told you and you believed. Anyway, I doubt you can use a quantum computer to search stuff

no because the US government hates itself
you can't hide from the CIA or the NSA, but you can hide from the FBI and the other three letters, and most importantly you can hide from corporations

What a great image
The cold war doesn't seem that cold now

Is it true that all human's made after 1800 have a backdoor?