Show me a more polished, user-friendly, bug-free Linux distribution, that just works

show me a more polished, user-friendly, bug-free Linux distribution, that just works

protip: you can't

Attached: ubuntu.png (1920x1080, 1.5M)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/Zren/plasma-hud
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/OpenSUSE-11.0-KDE3.5.png
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I can't , you're right.

Attached: photo_2018-10-29_21-42-29.jpg (749x745, 65K)

your monkey brain wouldn't be able to understand the image, here it is regardless.

Attached: 2019-01-03-104057_1024x600_scrot.png (1024x600, 8K)

Attached: ubuntu-14.04-desktop.jpg (1600x900, 216K)

blackbuntu?

Gentoo

>Unity
OH NONONONONOO
HAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHA
*sends your data to Amazon*
HAHAHAHA MOANING BROKEN HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAH HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA*inhales*
fuu-.....
HAHHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHHHAHHAHAHAH

Kek

>using the botnet flavor of free software
why even bother?

*blocks your path*

Attached: fedora.png (1920x1080, 1.36M)

Ubuntu is thw only one that works great with 4k screens without tweaking the ever fuck. If you say something else you dont have a 4k screen.

debian

i remember when a few years ago not having to from one end of your screen to the other to click File Edit View etc was a new feature, and now people cry over unity

Void

stfu noob
That is gnome3 you stupid fuck.

And ever since ubuntu adopted it, its been a piece of shit.

>no hud
>no integrated menus
>no vert space
>keyboard bizarrely stops functioning like it should under lightdm/X

I refuse to leave Unity7 until I at least get the HUD back, and will be moving to either unity8 or kde.

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-01-03 06-11-52.png (1366x768, 219K)

kubuntu

user I know you're posting on an inflammatory thread, but genuinely has any other distro worked with hidpi screen? everything seems to not work right besides Kubuntu (kinda)

There is a reason it is the most popular OS.

Attached: Screenshot_2014-12-11-12-43-16.jpg (315x560, 27K)

Debian stretch on KDE

Attached: Screenshot_20190103_183935.png (1600x900, 879K)

>user-friendly
>kde

pick one

mint

go KDE
github.com/Zren/plasma-hud

Attached: 68747470733a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f39346e696831312e706e67.png (642x511, 30K)

For Manjaro KDE has scaling but it was buggy for me atleast (visual glitches) openbox + arch combo did work for some time but its more of trial and error and alot of things to change.

Ubuntu is just the easiest. Its a shame that not more DEs are adapting to 4k.

lol retard

OpenSUSE.

honestly im beyond impressed that freecucks made some this beautiful. it really looks OS made some big ass corporation

What is "SUSE" and how do I open it?

i can see you havent even installed ubuntu you mongrel

that and centos is better in every single way

Is this going to be baked in?
Hows the stability and performance?
Does it work with root running applications like synaptic?
What apps does it not work with?

>proudly written in python
Oh wtf is this shit?

Attached: 1541554956774.gif (400x304, 1.95M)

based and boomerpilled.
>69187034
being better than ios doesn't make it good.

Is thisGNOME 4? No confused users? No bugs? No Features? I can't wait. The Future of Linux on Desktop.

Maybe, it's Open-Start-USE.

Attached: снимок2.jpg (800x600, 216K)

I'm sorry, I can't read Greek

I'm with you!

>bug-free

Attached: 1540609119788.png (1600x900, 875K)

mind = blown

>desktop icons
you were a mistake

Attached: 1515338803008.jpg (1000x1000, 448K)

Which distro should I install on an underpowered machine to run some basic tasks in my network? I need something lightweight and comfy with minimal setup and troubleshooting.
Do I go with Ubuntu or Debian?

Debian out of those two. OpenBSD if you don't have to use Linux.

Ubuntu MATE or Xubuntu.

I heard mate has the hud.

Attached: 1540314094850.gif (400x300, 971K)

Attached: shot5.jpg (800x600, 130K)

>user-friendly
>task bar has no indication of window titles
>only indication that there's even a window is a single small arrow
>no indication of whether the software is minimized or not
>no ability to display one icon per window
>if you use mouse controls, you need to *always* click the icon then click a second time to select window, unless there's only one window
And that's just a single fundamental aspect of the stock system.

I don't always drink beer but when i do i prefer dos equis.

Attached: blocksyourpath.jpg (1366x768, 122K)

The display side of GNU/Linux has to be restructured.
If I have two monitors connected, TTY1 should be on monitor 1 and TTY2 should be on monitor 2. If I switch to a higher TTY it will replace the current TTY on the current monitor, if I switch to an already displayed TTY I will switch to the monitor with that one.
DPI and stuff should also be added.
Prove me wrong.

I was making a joke, but thank-you for your efforts and consideration, user.

CentOS
Best setup procedure I ever experienced and good presets for common layouts of server systems.

What about this menu?

Attached: shot6.jpg (800x600, 102K)

>800x600

why

There is no Linux distribution that "just works". Linux is for retards who have nothing better to do with their lives

That's why nearly 50% of computers run it, right?

Kubuntu

I used it years ago and it was buggy as shit, but installing it from 2018 has been pretty much free of issues and bugs, way less than I had with ubuntu using gnome

That has already been debunked as bro science you retard

he actually uses Windows 10. He is only showing you he uses linux to look cool on a vietnamese chicken breeding forum. He does that by running it in his VM

Greek is available too in Open Start and USE.

Attached: shot8.jpg (800x600, 94K)

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/OpenSUSE-11.0-KDE3.5.png

miss these days desu

How so?

dude stfu do you know how stupid you sound right now?

Attached: free_speech.png (566x577, 52K)

>using non-LTS ubuntu version
All the boringness of ubuntu with none of the stability

You haven't disputed my statement. It is common knowledge that Linux makes up nearly 50% of all computer operating systems.

Mint Cinnamon

0.1%

and most of them dont even have addequate antivirus

fail.

Attached: 1540449377595.jpg (497x640, 101K)

Android alone is around 47%, pajeet.
>antivirus
Common Sense exists.

>being this much of a brainlet
This has to be bait.

Iss that why linux always has constant ssh vulnerabilities?

thats what you get with open source. basically anyone can figure out how to hack it because anyone can see it.

Attached: bestdistro.jpg (1280x720, 115K)

>security through obscurity
Laying it on too thick, pajeet.

>He does that by running it in his VM

Attached: shot11.jpg (800x600, 142K)

The problem is that linus torvalds does not "have time to fix this" with the constant intel reviews and tunnelbear ads

>Thunerbird
Come on now, this shit is a joke. No one fucking uses a separate program for their email.

>I never leave my home ensuring I always have internet

pah

Attached: 1542068035731.jpg (443x455, 96K)

>vietnamese chicken breeding forum

Attached: shot12.jpg (800x600, 94K)

>working out of the box
Admittedly, *ubuntu has gotten much better in the last couple years, it got rid of most of the botnet and not it's even better than Mint if you want a no-frills distro that just works right after installing.

>just werking after some tweaks
Unironically Gentoo. Most stable distribution out there, and it manages to do so without ancient packages like Debian.

Out of touch luddite here, is this true? How do normal people do their e-mailing now?

Yeah, eating CoC really gets in the way of actual innovations.
A century of baggage also doesn't help.

MS Outlook set by their administrator at work.
through web browser interface at home.

Huh. There you go, thanks user.

I feel that in my bones. thanks, I'll play around with arch+openbox

I manage over 10 email accounts, some are personal, some work related.
A dedicated program is a godsend. Claws mail is my client of choice.
Of course, if you have only one personal address you rarely use anyway, using the browser would be enough. But that's not always the case.

What linux distro is ACTUALLY stable?
And don't give me (insert name of distro), We all know that it's still unstable crap.

Attached: nevada.jpg (298x474, 48K)

Arch

Red Hat Enterprise Linux with purchased support.

ElementaryOS

Linux Mint Cindy

Q4OS. It's stable, it's lightweight, and it's fast. There are even ARM hard float images with the same desktop and tools set up for the Raspberry Pi and other ARM SBCs. The TDE desktop code is mature and well tested, and it doesn't depend on systemd, so the Q4OS repos can be added to something like Devuan and used to install their TDE build with all the menus and themes.

Attached: snapshot1.png (1600x1200, 131K)

>Thunderbi
>rd

Tell me why I should give a fuck.

Because this shit cannot wrap words properly. Word wrap with hyphen or "Thunderbi..." in one line or would looks more neat, do you agree?

/thread

It doesn't make a difference in the functionality of the desktop so it doesn't matter. TDE isn't meant to be bright and flashy. It's meant to be stable and usable.

Does its "start" menu have application/file search(indexer)?

>most bug free and just works distro
>still can't even rearrange 2 monitors each connected to a separate GPU without fucking up
Am I asking alot here or something? because both Windows and even macOS works fine with this and it's not even a mac

>*sends your data to Amazon*
Does not happen on ubuntu 16.04 unless you enable it.

It's because it's the only alternative to iShit.

Linux desktop (for casual users) is not mature and still going through its "baby phase", so its kinda a lot to ask.

>using http

>Is his going to be baked in?
probably

its work with every app working with the global menu, you need a global menu tho

>you need a global menu tho
or the burger menu

It indexes applications but not files. At least not by default, and I'm too lazy to play with all the menu settings.

Attached: snapshot2.png (424x548, 54K)

You're right, Ubuntu is truly the king of double-edged swords.
>the most polished distro out of the box, with the least resilience to configuration changes
>the most user-friendly distro, with the least resilience to advanced use
>the most bug-free distro, because any feature that could cause bugs on some systems tends to just be a feature it doesn't even have
>the distro that just works, when you use it as intended