Is Audacious the most underrated music player for Linux?

is Audacious the most underrated music player for Linux?

Attached: file.png (750x457, 539K)

what does (clean) mean?

Strawberry is the best

That would be lollypop

all of gui players for linux kind of suck. i'd just use cmus or mpd + ncmpcpp if i were on linux.

No swearsies the puppers don't like

No. In the end, it's just the current fork of XMMS with a GTK+ interface.

Cleaned from all profanities. If there's a "fuck" anywhere in the lyrics, it's silenced out. Pretty much only a US thing.

btw op that little wave in the bottom right takes considerable cpu cycles so you might wanna turn it off

>not just using mpv

The only true *nix music player is mpd

I have an i7-6700, I'm pretty sure my computer can handle a little wave.

yes.

Attached: i-don't.png (1085x691, 111K)

>he has an intel

Attached: 1527229447807s.jpg (250x223, 9K)

>he has an AMD

Attached: file.png (227x222, 92K)

true

Audacious is the foobar2000 of Windows

lollypop is very large. I used it for a while but it made my thinkpad a few degrees hotter than normal
I built audacious with qt
mpv is nice and all but sometimes I need to not look autistic

>Not using Clementine.

Can't play dsf, can't play ISO files.
Basic functionality is missing to be called such loud names.

cmus or nothing

>no update for 3 years

>dat cringeworthy toolbar

Attached: Screenshot_2019-01-05_22-34-34.png (495x28, 15K)

AUDACIOUS IS SO FDUCKING GOOD

What's the closest I can get to functionality-parity with fb2k on linux without using WINE?

Deadbeef

Attached: 1517575976312.png (717x588, 80K)