Why is intel so inefficient?

Why is intel so inefficient?

Attached: 1546709880014.png (712x1441, 153K)

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/229189
amazon.ca/Best-Sellers-Electronics-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/1233052011
amazon.co.uk/Best-Sellers-Computers-Accessories-Processors/zgbs/computers/430515031
amazon.com.au/gp/bestsellers/computers/4913338051
amazon.fr/gp/bestsellers/computers/430352031
amazon.de/gp/bestsellers/computers/430177031
amazon.it/gp/bestsellers/electronics/460126031
amazon.in/Processors/b?ie=UTF8&node=1375391031
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

because half of the CPU is used for backdoors

Implying AMD wouldn't do the same if their CPUs didn't suck horse balls.

Attached: 1436734391281.jpg (202x249, 30K)

Seething

Why would I be seething? My team is winning.

they do exactly the same
gosh, amdrones are just as stupid as intlets

>amd is outselling intel 2:1
INTEL YES

Attached: file.png (2000x1543, 129K)

>higher is better
>poor people's opinion matter
Only amdrones are actually retarded.

PLS SIR DO NEEDFUL

Attached: poointhecpoo1.jpg (700x466, 37K)

HiGhEr Is BeTtEr

Why are you Jow Forumstards so easy to bait? Easiest (You)s of my life.

THE MORE VULNERABILITIES THE BETTER
STOP KVETCHING AND JUST BUY IT GOY

ples sir delid dis

(you)s are worth nothing if you just make shit up

>the most powerful AMD CPU to date only performs slightly better than a last year's i7

Attached: 1505472662603.jpg (720x715, 34K)

AMD keeps bottlenecking somewhere so their cores are idle. Intel is going at 100% and producing twice as many fps.

>i3 consumes as much power as AMD's top of the line desktop processor
TRUE KEKS

Attached: BIGGER BARS ARE BETTER AMD BTFO.png (631x310, 21K)

just buy it please

Attached: 1506977173618.jpg (882x758, 324K)

*blocks your path*

Attached: vega-56-mod-power-aotse_all.png (797x371, 60K)

I know this is a bait thread but it's because Intel CPU's have higher clocks
The whole reason multicore and -threading are better is because it'd take 4x the energy to make the electrons move 2x faster whereas you could run 4 cores at half the speed for the same power

Let's spot the indiantel niggers


amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/229189

amazon.ca/Best-Sellers-Electronics-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/1233052011

amazon.co.uk/Best-Sellers-Computers-Accessories-Processors/zgbs/computers/430515031

amazon.com.au/gp/bestsellers/computers/4913338051

amazon.fr/gp/bestsellers/computers/430352031

amazon.de/gp/bestsellers/computers/430177031

amazon.it/gp/bestsellers/electronics/460126031

amazon.in/Processors/b?ie=UTF8&node=1375391031

Attached: 1545679090679.jpg (691x808, 70K)