INTEL TO SELL DELID CPUS

AMD BTFO

Attached: 1523625457527.jpg (1280x788, 76K)

DELID THI... oh wait

Attached: images(2).jpg (597x513, 49K)

the fuck are you on about

Post the article.

based

Must be hard when the shill is the source and kind of has to disclose who their employer are...

Sucks to be OP or the dick he is sucking.

I bet they will be more expensive too.
>we did the work of taking the lid off our CPU for you goy, pay up

>no warranty

kek

Why doesn't intel just make a retention mechanism for their CPUs that forms a raised rim around the die like what GPUs have so every cooler can be direct die?

Attached: the-radeon-rx-vega-64-gpu-review-14.jpg (1920x1080, 1.16M)

>Use glue, people complain, wasted shekels
>Don't use glue, people love it, more shekels
Intel just went WOKE

Attached: 1490881509645.png (623x590, 22K)

15 years ago, heatsinks got clamped down directly, and the metal safety spacers were sold as "CPU shims" for those too incompetent to not otherwise crack their dies.
Typical heatsinks nowadays are bulky enough that the shims would be necessary anyway, but "heatspreaders" have been standard for this long due to manufacturers just not wanting to fuck with returns from retards, so don't hold your breath on a dramatic reversal in the course of industry.

>2019 Intel CPUs don't even come with lids
Will cuckcove require you to buy your own pins next?

sunny cove? more like shitty cope

And used literal foam pads to protect their direct die CPUs in 2000s

You have to be a moron to crack a die the IHS exists to stop people pushing CPUs so hard and warrenty returns no other reason it's a shit design and solder doesn't fix that IHS have to go from both and amd and Intel

Mobile CPUs don't have a IHS

Source or fuck off.

This times 100.

Why would chipmakers not have come up with a better solution for attaching die lids by now? They're giving up performance for no reason.

They're the cheapest solution.

If they can get 10% more performance they can sell their products for more.

A good solution for them I think would be to ship CPUs with those fancy 3m heat transfer pads attached, and then a buyer can either just clamp the headsink right onto that (no paste required), or take it off if they so choose (without having to delid)

Also they're somewhat required now with CPUs being clamped down vs. being held in by pins (at least on Intel's side and AMD for TR4/SP3)

Intel has required you to buy the pins since 775...

They do, on the included CPU cooler.

Yes, but they're including the unnecessary extra layers of the lid and the paste attaching the lid.

Just apply the factory pad to the CPU die instead of to the factory cooler.

Why?
For the .0000001% of people who not only build their own computers but also use third party non-standard components?
Why would anyone spend more money just to appease such a small amount of people.

Don't get me wrong, I'm one of those people, but why would a corporation spend countless millions changing an existing process to help a few people out?
Would Intel or AMD get more money out of it?

It'd be cheaper. Just leave the lid/spreader off (save on process/materials), and just apply the thermal pad directly to the die as protection.

Except it wouldn't be, 80% of PIBs would be returned via RMA.

kek. whats next? delapp CPU's?

aren't 9xxx the same as 8xxx, except former are using solder?

yes the 9xxxKelvins are soldered but the die is THICC as hell. check out der8auer on the 9900Kelvin for more infos and some giggles when he actually delapps working silicon