Firefox 56.0.2

>Firefox is slowing down as more and more websites deliberately sabotage non-Google browsers
>YouTube takes 5-6 seconds to load each page
>Facebook takes 10+
>Even the Jow Forums catalog wigs out from time to time and refuses to load

I will not use Chrome because I'm not a cuckold, but I can't just give up features to upgrade to the latest Firefox.

Fuck this gay earth.

Attached: 1532455369314.jpg (287x293, 16K)

Other urls found in this thread:

chromium.woolyss.com/#win64-stable-ungoogled
github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium/blob/master/docs/design.md#source-file-processors
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Jow Forums, is in fact, 4channel, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, 4 + channel. Jow Forums is not a website unto itself, but rather one domain in a fully functioning ecchi-otaku network made usable by the moderators, janitors, and vital advertising partners comprising a full image-based bulletin board system as defined by Hiroyuki Nishimura.

>Facebook
Leave and never return.

Attached: 1544051836280.gif (438x450, 431K)

ungoogled-chromium
>chromium.woolyss.com/#win64-stable-ungoogled
your're welcome!

Chromium still has Google blobs, and is therefore not secure nor does it allow for privacy. It's still Google surveillance, just in a different wrapper.

>Facebook
I have a facebook to have one but never use it. You should have one but you should never use it, user

wtf is a blob? its open source you can see the source code for yourself

Only for messenger.

Group texts are awful for anything other than emergencies and sending out (not discussing) plans. Discord is (like Facebook) botnet, and normies won't use it. There are no other ways to effectively communicate and share pictures/links/whatever with multiple people.

Would changing the user-agent circumvent this, or is it directly tied to FF's code?

Chromium uses closed-source bits of code, from Google, which means it is inherently not secure and inherently works against your privacy.

The default stance is that it can't be trusted - the onus is on you to prove that Google's blackbox code blobs do not invade user privacy. Good luck.

Attached: 1486696484377.png (649x611, 639K)