NVME FAGS BTFO

NVME FAGS BTFO
youtube.com/watch?v=OjWUGsQNSvE
NVME provides sub 10% actual benefits over a SATA ssd in real life scenarios

Attached: 41uxmXSrtxL.jpg (500x375, 20K)

It'd be interesting to see if the gap closes even more with an M.2 SATA drive instead of a 2.5" one. I went NVME because the 970 Evo happened to be on a good sale when I was parts shopping and I liked the form factor, but I haven't been totally convinced it makes any tangible performance difference either.

>all ssds are 4-5 times cheaper than sata ssds were 5 years ago
Just buy what you feel like buying.

>real life scenarios
You mean casualfag games.

Although anyone who looked at the disk activity in your average games/programs shouldn't be surprised by this.

>It'd be interesting to see if the gap closes even more with an M.2 SATA drive instead of a 2.5" one.

It will not because there is literally no difference between these except the packaging.

>muh gaymes

Attached: 951.png (474x711, 90K)

>real life scenarios
>literally the opposite of reality

>top end expensive SSDs make your sysem launch applications faster goy
>this test shows that NVME dosn't make the most asset heavy applications launch significantly faster
>HURRRRR

games are about the heaviest applications there are and represent the second best use case for the nvme ssds with the first being large file transfer.

> launch applications faster
implying NVMe speed is only for application loading time
DURRRR

Attached: hurr-durr-17855291.png (500x522, 41K)

>games are about the heaviest applications there are

No, for disk usage they aren't.