>muh esports
>7nm Radeon 7 = 699 USD
>hardly beats RTX 2080
AMD AT CES - TOTAL FLOP
Owen Wright
Angel Howard
Cheaper than the 2080 with more memory
Ayden Carter
Yes but everyone was expecting new CPUs
Evan Butler
Amd loves gaming.
Amd loves gamers.
Ryder Rodriguez
ADOREDTV BTFO ALL YOU RETARDS BELIEVED HIM
Xavier Morris
>cheaper
No, it's the same speed in AMD favored games ran by AMD at AMD favored settings, with no ray tracing, and it's more expensive.
Jose Sanchez
>caters to gayming crowd with Vega 7 for $700
>2nd gen epyc confirmed caters to real users
>ryzen next gen
>runs live cinebench
Looks pretty good to me so far. How was Intels in comparison?
Andrew Jackson
guess you are on a suicide watch
Juan Flores
>posts a more expensive product to claim that it's cheaper
Are all novidya shills this dumb?
Austin Nelson
>AMDrones can't read
Why does this come up time after time after time after time after time?
Oliver Hall
They announced a 64 coar EPYC processor and gave a vague idea of what Ryzen might be like, but in reality we probably won't see them until 2020
Brayden Brown
>she literally said 1H
Benjamin Gutierrez
>$729
>On sale
>Half the VRAM
Nathaniel Walker
this unironically
Jack Roberts
DELID THIS SIR
Brody Peterson
I heard her say mid 2019. When is intel 7nmm coming?
Lincoln Thompson
What do you even do that needs 16GB VRAM.
Parker Reed
4K, ultra textures
Charles Brooks
This. 8GB is more than enough for anyone for the foreseeable future.
Oliver Hill
have fun waiting for an hour for the textures to load.
Gabriel Ortiz
Asher Wright
damn these fuckers dont waste time at all. hahah
Nolan Davis
Short it
Grayson Sullivan
>Doesn’t have raytracing
Literally its the only thing I would consider even upgrading my GPU for at this point. And that’s hardly a competitive price anyway. If it was 400$ or something then it would be worth it.
Gabriel Nguyen
Pamp et
Lincoln Powell
>FPS doesn't matter!
>NEW: VRAM doesn't matter!
Levi Walker
How much vram you got for the same price?
How many games you bought that has Ray tracing?
Ryder James
>>NEW: VRAM doesn't matter!
It is not new. Remember 3.5 GB?
Colton Barnes
Jim was the first person in the entire tech press to reveal that Ryzen 3000 would use chiplets and an IO die as opposed to the monolithic design the entire rest of the tech press expected.
The use of 7nm chiplets on Ryzen 3000, and their arrangement on the package, makes it obvious that a dual chiplet variant will be possible.
Using the same 7nm chiplets for Eypc 2, consoles, and Ryzen 3000 means AMD will have a much larger volume of chips to speed bin for Ryzen 3000 than they would have on a monolithic design, making significant clock improvements much more likely than they would be on a monolithic design.
AMD also showed an 8c/16t early engineering sample beating a 9900k in Cinebench, and since the number of cores and threads are the same, it strongly suggests a minimum of equivalent per-core performance.
Overall, Jim was far more correct than the entire rest of the tech-press put together, and Jim's latest pre-CES video specifically discussed the possibility of Ryzen 3000 officially launching at Computex, which fits right into "middle of 2019" as Lisa Su said on stage.
I don't know what kind of crack the rest of you are smoking, but to me Jim came out of this looking very good.
Benjamin Johnson
kill yourself and your pasta retard
Gabriel Garcia
That tease space
Carter Cox
UH OH DAMAGE CONTROL TIME
Bentley Bell
>VRAM
COPE
Dylan Gutierrez
>Shilled on a GPU that potentially could've been better but isn't.
Henry Ross
I just want a 1440p capable FreeSync card that doesn't act as a room heater. Is that really too much?