Prove me wrong

proov me wrog

Attached: proov me wrog .png (726x486, 70K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Us3_8FxoAls
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>proov me wrog
yes, you are

Swap FreeBSD and Windows and you're golden.

>microsoft is good like linux right guys?

>windows
>good software

Why are you comparing a kernel to three operating systems?

It's not. It's much better.

It's actually a single dimension
Good software/bad cause vs bad software/good cause
You can support wealth inequality or you can use a crappy operating system.

>support wealth inequality AND use a superior OS
Sounds like a win-win to me.

this

>Linux
>Good software

Attached: 1546967457344.png (446x435, 79K)

>being a gnu/zealot

Tux is a kernel.

>muh GNU
Fuck off, Richard. You can make a fully functional Linux system that doesn't use any GNU garbage.

No, you'll always need GCC to compile the kernel.

Clang

So every software written using some of the GNU extensions to the C language that only gcc implements needs to be named GNU/whatever? Top kek.

No. Linux isn't called GNU/Linux. Linux is called Linux. GNU/Linux is the combination of Linux and GNU, forming an OS. How hard is it to understand this?

mod on this board is a cunt
youtube.com/watch?v=Us3_8FxoAls

He forgot to mention that Linux is also a part of GNU, which means there's no Linux without GNU.

Why should I call a system GNU/Linux if there is no GNU software included? Because a single piece of GNU software was used to produce a binary?

>Because a single piece of GNU software was used to produce a binary?
Yes.

> communism
> good cause
pick one

So if software X was compiled with gcc it should be called GNU/X?

Yeah, I'm running LLVM/Clang/FreeBSD on my machine.

>Windows
>good software
>BSD
>bad software
and wtf is up with the causes bs?

poof ursev rite, buttcha cantah

>He forgot to mention that Linux is also a part of GNU
no

>No, you'll always need GCC to compile the kernel.
i thought it was possible to build it with clang

>anything
>good software

windows is lower than applel nowadays... built in ads, 100% bandwidth, mid-work restarts/updates, seeds itself...

fixed it for you

Attached: proov me wrog .png (726x486, 72K)

You only have one perspective.
How can you say Windows is good software

Attached: 1547057363553.png (1086x972, 134K)

Not that anyone asked but I AM USING LINUX

ftfy

Attached: software_quality_vs_virtue.png (726x486, 99K)

why the fuck are you comparing a kernel to 3 full operating systems

Political compass

Attached: .png (726x486, 67K)

got my ass with those stray dots, thanks for reminding me to wipe my monitor

>Oracle
>good
please kindly do the needful sir

this
there is literally nothing wrong with *BSD

Fuck you. The fact that this works pretty much exactly in favor of my OS prefferences and exactly out of favor of my political prefferences makes my skin crawl
Too many keks

Attached: sammy.gif (300x219, 2.53M)

I got myself too haha
solaris was perfectly usable until oracle bought it, then they killed opensolaris and made the licensing confusing
BSD is arguably better than Linux in some cases. Instead of every piece of the OS being developed by a different group it's almost all managed by the projects themselves. You don't see a GNU/BSD. My only problems is that it doesn't support some of my wifi cards

would make a great trap

i think he was already like 16 in the gif
too late