Less than 4.4, a 2700X running at 4.4 will score around 2050 and it makes no sense for Zen 2 to perform worse than Zen+
LAWL DEAD FOR GAMING
Elijah Turner
Michael Young
That much? Then Zen2 could run 4.0-4.1 GHz all core in that comparison.
Carter Ward
Levi Bell
That could be specially tuned for CB performance, while that stage test was not.
Ryan Clark
>That could be specially tuned for CB performance
Going by my own personal experience with OCed benchmarking CB15 has no real shortcuts to getting better scores outside of fudging the workload which you can verify, and redoing the bench over and over which at best yields a couple dozen points
I mean it's not fucking ice storm where you can multiply your score by running a desktop resolution of 320x240
Dylan Morales
I run 120fps max on my 1080ti on 1080p w/ stock 8700k i tested today. but on 5ghz is 150
Jose Lee
yeah, it is a nice CPU-pure bench.
But wasn't there a cinebench "bias" in some bioses?
Easton Wright
>But wasn't there a cinebench "bias" in some bioses?
Only two sources I can find with any number or info are a reddit post which claims 30 points more on his 1700X and this set of test on a 1500X
So yes it's possible but the impact is still fairly limited (5% at the very most) band there's no way to know if it was activated in any of those benches.
Jaxson Brooks
My point was mainly that hwbot has people trying to break records so extra tuning is likely.
I know an AMD enthusiast that passes time like this and IIRC there are some things you can tune.
Matisse is going to great anyway.