Nvidiots will defend this

SEETHING

Attached: 1547067169619.png (678x2140, 1.19M)

2080 costs 699 msrp

You fucking wish

There is a huge market for gpu compute now, the gamer cards are all thrash that couldn't pass the quality tests to become teslas or radeon instincts that sell for 5000+

You should be grateful they even care about your manchildren gaymes.

>Better efficiency/noise/thermals

So AMDrones are just outright lying now

Attached: 1360738894564.gif (300x188, 1.18M)

>Better performance than 2080 for 100$ less than 2080
They're both the same price retard. And "better performance"? AMD said "better performance in select titles"
Read: 5-10% slower in almost everything, but there are a handful of games we can cherry pick where it's 2% better

>you should smile while getting cucked by nvidia
fuck off shlomo

Attached: 1470457029422.jpg (263x383, 41K)

Attached: Screenshot_20190109-175946.png (1440x2880, 574K)

>$699 for 2yo performance
>but amd's cock tastes better

Attached: 2080.png (1638x845, 462K)

>bottom of the barrel reference card with a gigabyte heatsink with a $70 discount
wow you showed me how much value nvidia has

>its ok when nvidia does it

Attached: 1452799837787.png (512x800, 650K)

Hello sir please delete post thank you.

>>Better efficiency/noise/thermals than 2080 for 100$ less than 2080
>>Better performance than 2080 for 100$ less than 2080
So you drones are just outright lying now.
Anyway, congratulations on finally getting a card on the 7nm node that compares with 2+ year old performance. nVidia BTFO, right?

Yeah because MSRP radeon cards aren't reference bottom of the barrel stuff.

Attached: 1544149099031.gif (240x180, 961K)

>460 is comparable to 2080

Attached: You.jpg (211x194, 43K)

>completely changing the subject to not actually argue with OP
Nvidiots everyone

You can also see the traces going to the space for the second chiplet in the video, Intlel is fucked.

both are midrange 104 class gpus and both have 200-300 mm2 die sizes

>Shadman

Because we weren't arguing with the OP, retard. Look at the post we were replying to.

>being a pedophile

>Reference
>Bottom of the barrel
It's really your very first day as a hardware user, huh?

Turing dies are huge, what are you smoking? the 2080 is like 550 mm^2

What your own posts while you samefag and derail the thread

>amdrone
>clueless retard
checks out
techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-rtx-2080.c3224
>545 mm2

>everyone I disagree with is samefagging, Mom!!!
Cope.

On a process thats now nearly 5 years old, yields are perfect and there is no excuse for turing to cost any much more than fermi, even the 480 was bigger and almost half the price

*280

Full Turing 102 gpu: RTX Titan
Price: $2500
Full Pascal 102 gpu: Titan Xp
Price: $1200

>Yea just make it more expensive nvidia i love being jewed

Attached: 1494289777740.png (539x722, 290K)

Full maxwell 100 gpu: Titan X
Price: $1000
Full volta 100 gpu: Titan V
Price: $3000

Full 106 pascal GPU: GTX 1060 6gb
Price: $250
Full 106 Turing GPU: RTX 2070
Price: $600

Full 104 pascal GPU: GTX 1080
Price: $600
Cut down 104 turing GPU: RTX 2080
Price: $800

SIR PLS DELET DIS DO NEEDFUL

Attached: 1492573533249.jpg (796x805, 159K)

DELID DIS RIGHT NOW ANTISEMITE

coping

Ya ok but which ones more powerful

HBM2 and 7nm should save on power