zdnet.com
Windows doesn't have this problem.
zdnet.com
Windows doesn't have this problem.
Other urls found in this thread:
google.com
twitter.com
Because Windows itself is a security hole.
No, it just deletes your files.
linux is a kernel.
>security as a product
Wanna know how I know you're an infosec illiterate?
google.com
Are you OK?
LOONIX BTF-
>openSUSE Leap 15.0, and Fedora 28 and 29 are not exploitable
...oh
more FUD, right on time when the US government is considering switching. Who could be behind this post.
Install /ourdistro/
>font rendering kernel exploits
Linux doesn't have this problem.
>linux is a kernel.
>2019
>using systemd
>Core 2 Duo
Is this one of those Thinkpad meme laptops?
Hurd is a kernel, too.
>he doesn't run busybox+hurd as his daily driver
Just yesterday Microsoft released a windows update that broke EVERY Windows 7 based network share.
Please gas yourself.
Probably chosen for lack of IME
>Model: 7459M78 ThinkPad X200
Nah, I think it's a macbook.
>patches already ready to go
>50% of distros have the patches already without updates by running upstream before the vulnerability is discovered
>some other percent doesn't even use systemd
>the other 50% has the patches as soon as the CVE is announced
>????
>windows doesn't have this problem
more like windows doesn't have this advantage, users don't know what they are vulnerable to and when there's patches they need to restart the computer for an hour. Or otherwise stay vulnerable to God knows what, that only the hackers know and Microsoft knows. Cool.
>security as a product
Let's start a class action lawsuit against Microsoft for not delivering, then.
>ext data loss
>only one result actually related
>2009
>talks about how the issue is fixed
>implying ext{1,2,3,4} are the only file systems on Linux
Are you even trying?
>Let's start a class action lawsuit against Microsoft
At least with Windows you have someone to sue if things go wrong. Which is incidentally why enterprises don't use Linux. Well that and the higher average TCO.
You know how I can tell that you know nothing about computers?
>Systemd security problems
Wow, if only anyone had seen this coming!
>Laughing in runit
Man, I love my void box
Why is this allowed? Why did systemd gain so much popularity so quickly?
Time to switch from Xubuntu to MX
Windows has significantly more security holes.
>enables a hostile local user to take over a system.
>local user
>takes over an hour to do this to a machine
>relevant distros already patched this
Hahahahahaha, fuck off with your fud.
The only things that are reported by Windows users are malfunctions, not bugs, because since it's source code it's private, nobody can't tell if your software is behaving how it it's intended.
>Windows doesn't have this problem.
neither does gentoo
yea, it has 300000000 other problems
Why is this?
>enterprises don't use linux
>80% of websites don't use linux servers
retard
Install Gentoo man
>devuan
>the highest amount of systemd in a non-systemd distro
At least get a distro where not using systemd also includes not having optional dependencies to systemd always enabled. In other words install Gentoo.
>Red Hat Enterprise Linux
>this you-get-to-sue-someone edition of Linux isn't even the most commonly used one
big thonk
>It has pulseaudio so it's literally like running systemd!
>pulseaudio
You made proving my point quite a bit easier there.
>Having systemd libraries lying around on your system although you're not using it
kek
I still don't see the issue. What I don't want to run is systemd, and I'm not running it. What's the issue with having some of its libraries in my system?