Why is Silicone Valley filled with progressives?

Why is Silicone Valley filled with progressives?

Is there any company in Silicone Valley that doesn't push diversity?

Attached: 1545949452996.jpg (713x960, 91K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

They are all in California, land of the actually free

>Is there any company in Silicone Valley that doesn't push diversity?
The one that you create. Also
>Silicone

more like degenerates

>Is there any company in Silicone Valley that doesn't push diversity?
Oh, you mean one of the failed startups that has tried and failed to develop a "Facebook alternative" that "fosters" freeze peach "for alternative viewpoints" that ends up with a forum filled with incels?

Even Google failed to create a facebook alternative so it's not exactly shameful to fail that task.

One of my white male coworkers legitimately said the criteria for the next hire should be that they're not a white male and nobody on the hiring staff expressed disagreement with this.
He still works here, and the last 4+ hires have been black women.
It's legitimately this bad in some places. Genuinely suggesting that we hire based on race and sex. Legitimate racism is acceptable in my workplace.

Surely the company will fail at some point or are they hiring competent blacks (not many of those)

They are all indoctrinated by Communist professors in college

None of them do anything important. But I still think it's a bad practice.

LOL@"Silicone" Valley

That's one way to move stocks.
The other way would be the actual technological progress, but that's kinda hard.

>Silicone Valley

All i see is a cuck with only daughters and a real alpha Italian with only sons.

Giving free reign to a disease causing sociopath isn't a form progressive diversity.

>The Virgin Deniro
>The Chad Stallone

Disgusting mutts

>Why is Silicone Valley filled with progressives?
silicon valley companies are driven purely by statistical processes geared towards maximizing profit. under the capitalist model, if your company does not grow year-on-year, it is a failure.

it follows that diversity is good for profit, if your observation is true.

>diversity is good for profit
I think it's a bit more complicated than that. For example, having a few drunk drivers on the road increases diversity but isn't likely to improve the transportation system of one's community.

>California, land of the actually free
Fuckin kek

omg I LOVE CALIFORNIA!!

Attached: 1545658722588.png (644x792, 552K)

Those fucking mongoloid deniro kids, jfc

california is on the downward trend. go to sf where they are leading the pack in stupidity. thats what california is going to look like across the board soon enough.

Then we export these idiots to areas which have not been tainted by their stupidity yet.

Freedom

Attached: Road-Warrior.jpg (449x450, 61K)

>They are all indoctrinated by Communist professors in college
the entire concept of tech companies is maximizing the surplus profit they can appropriate from their workers. doesn't sound like communism to me.

>Then we export these idiots to areas which have not been tainted by their stupidity yet
this pisses me off the most, all those communists assholes moving to other areas and turning them into high tax and shitskin infested democrat shitholes like that dump of a state

did you just see the word "driven" and think the post was about cars? how are you so far off the point of this thread?

d-dios mio... los ogros de las americas...

Freedom from savagery and freedom from tyranny are different from freedom to be a savage and freedom to be a tyrant. It is hilarious how these different agendas are hidden behind the ambiguous term "freedom".

californians salivate over the idea of turning texas blue. and they ignore the dumpster fire that is every democrat run city which they are dying to escape.

Are you off your meds?

Oh yeah I know, why do you think the left is for open borders, against voter ID laws while also giving licenses to illegals? Because they know minorities want gibs and will vote for "socialism" every single time. They don't give a shit about turning the USA into a third world country as long as they stay in power. It blows my mind how so many people refuse to see this.

> diversity
The reason the chinks are catching up.
UC system + other merit based schools like Caltech are our only hope

Attached: 1541323425.png (1467x825, 1.09M)

If it's merit-based, they'll all be chinese. The chinese have better grades, higher test scores.

No, because science strives for advancement of not only itself, but humanity.

>95% of posters in this thread are 25yo males
>no longterm employment opportunities
>facing the prospect of living with their parents or renting forever as property prices spiral out of control
>live with constant threat of a medical emergency wiping out any financial security you might have
>atomization of society has removed the spaces to develop fulfilling relationships, replaced by the facsimile of social media and infinite entertainment

hmm and coloured people in similar economic peril are to blame for this why?

Attached: THIS.gif (350x188, 323K)

>No, because science strives for advancement of not only itself, but humanity.
This guys! I LOVE my new retina display iMac Pro

Attached: 1545970361197.jpg (750x1000, 83K)

This thread drips of incel agsnt

Yea but it's white on white racism so deal with it.

Attached: 11140140_10206588969354734_3196767163896603296_n.jpg (680x471, 65K)

heh

>California, land of the actually free
>i know nothing about california, nor america in general, the post

And how does flooding America and Europe with retarded shitskins and imposing socialism fix any of those things?

> they'll all be chinese
I know that test scores aren't the best indicator of talent, but at least its better than skin color. Who cares about skin color if theyre good at what they do. Lots of these are asian americans who would gladly work for American companies over Chinese ones

not them, but the point stands. diversity in their example refers to the diversity of sobriety, some being inebriated. clearly that's a net negative.

I do agree with diversity in the workplace, but I think that we will see many negative effects for a bit. The idea is that people of different backgrounds effectively bring different implicit rules to the table, whether it be large things, like ideas of morality, or small things, like burping. This increases the complexity of social interactions substantially. What was once steadfast social norms quickly becomes confusing interactions. To solve this, we must ask "why" cultures are rather than "what" culture should be. This is the only way to simplifying the chaotic mess of new rules that have just been brought to the table. As long as people are pushing "what" culture should be, there isn't going to be any progress.

You should ask the white people that americans and europeans keep electing.

>similar economic peril
They get preferential treatment regarding simple work like office positions in bureaucracies and employment in general.
They might be similar, but they still have it better.

In my tech company I heard people talking about some guy getting hired but others were trying to figure out a way to get rid of him but they couldn't because he already accepted the offer. They were trying to get rid of him because nearly everyone in the company is white and most are males and they found a woman applicant later in the interviewing efforts and they wanted to get her instead because there's too many men.
White boy got lucky he got in when he did because they're trying to diversify everything here too.
And this is in Utah of all places.
>come home white man
nah lmao stay out white bitches

>not them, but the point stands. diversity in their example refers to the diversity of sobriety.
no, the point doesn't stand at all. the assertion that "diversity is profitable" is clearly given in the context of company processes driven by statistics. it's a specious comparison to apply it to some other bullshit completely outside of the topic of conversation.

>(((white people)))
>"electing"
Trump was a bizarre thing, but I wouldn't count on that happening again, nor him really doing anything meaningful.

>They get preferential treatment regarding simple work like office positions in bureaucracies and employment in general.
>They might be similar, but they still have it better.
who's "they", in this case? is it the same "they" who get "preferentially selected" to drive the gears of the prison industrial complex?

So Macron is Jewish? And Trump is a huge ally of Israel too. Maybe not as much as other GOP but his kids are Jewish. There's no conspiracy, all these white people in power just really like jews because they like money and couldn't give a shit about whiteness

Why not start a company in Alabama? Your kind would be welcome there.

well maybe if americans gained some personal perspective

on the goings on in countries

torn apart by conflicts

that america had large influence in

they'd stop spending all their money on armaments

and help out their people in need

I wouldn't count on a republican ever being elected again

This.
>spending billions on weapons to kill toddlers on the other side of the world is okay
>providing citizens with affordable healthcare and education is socialsm

there's about 20 shitheads lined up to try to disrupt the bernie train because the democrats are so afraid of moving left they'd rather lose the election again than make radical change

>P A I D
>T O
>L O S E

Yeah fucking right, those countries are shitholes and have problems because of the parasites that live there. And now the left wants to turn the US into spic land because they want and need the votes. Everywhere spanish speaking people go they cause problems, commit crimes sell drugs and turn the whole area into a shithole. At some point you have to look at facts. They are the problem.

it doesn't seem like you have a great understanding of how traumatic it is to be a refugee. people don't leave their "shithole" countries just on a whim. they are forced to leave because abandoning their entire life and possessions is the only viable option available to them.

whatever your opinion is of the countries they are leaving, these people aren't anywhere near positions of power to make meaningful changes.

>And now the left wants to turn the US into spic land because they want and need the votes.
While republicans gerrymander, purge voter roles, close polling places, and make ballots they don't like mysteriously disappear

>atomization of society not being directly correlated with diversity
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities
cute

Hey! We also have the best dairies in the US.

I think you're thinking too hard about this. Most people who do not like foreigners or people from other group seem to not like them because of some innate disposition toward mistrust of the out group, an instinctive belief that if someone is not part of some identity they define themselves by, that these people do not share their fate and have divergent interests from them. This disposition precedes observation in the world.

They think "this Indian guy is not like me, not part of my group, and is actually part of a rival group. There is the possibility that he and people like him could fuck me over and would benefit from it whereas me and people like me would lose from it. He and I do not rise and fall at the same time."

So they don't like them.