...like fiber optic?

>LiFi
>new
>2019

What a shit article.

Well I'm sure you do lol

Chances of LiFi making it into consumer electronics are sub 1%.

z fiber optic doesn't run on light though. It runs on refractive tubes that CONTAIN light. This is different.

Sure, little Jimmy. Now go play cars with your little brother.

Sounds like you'd need a dish pointed at the light source for this to work

Also, if you had a Li-Fi receiving device in a room with other flashing lights, like a TV, wouldn't that just ruin it?

to be fair she admits it's not new in the second paragraph

Retardes as you are. Omg.
wifi does not stands for wireless fidelity.unlike hifi.
Also this stupid techmology has been around for few years and since you not see it in erryday life it is scam and useless. Otherwise itd be adopted long ago.

Been seeing articles about lifi for years now. First one I saw was a ted talk back in 2015 or 2016. The guy made it seem like it was some revolutionary tech like 5g. Why exactly is it a scam or why wouldn't it work in real life?

I remember when this was called infrared.

>he can't see the frequency of light
are you a dog?

>It was just a joke guys I swear

i can't fucking wait until the "OMG WIRELESS CAUSE CANCER" nutjobs get on this

>that boomer tech illiterate who calls fibre as fiber

Attached: Laughing Whore.jpg (762x900, 161K)

But it's not using fiber

no stop, lies. its fiber

It runs on alternance of light and dark.

This
It's nothing more than beefed up IR remote.

>2019
>Trusting Lie-Fi

Lie-Fi sounds like the perfect name for a highend audio company

but it fucking does cause cancer :^)

i have some news for you user...

What is UV?

I'm going to throw a fit if you tell me that not everyone in here likes tech

I fucking hate technology. I come here to hate it with others.
I hate my phone, I hate my computer I hate every modern technology, because it's all cancer

Contrarianism is huge here

This technology will never see the light of day as long as having your hands block the LiFi signal stays a problem.

WiFi is already made of light. Checkmate atheists.

>turn off lights
>can't use internet anymore
Unless the Li-Fi lights blink so quickly your mind still perceives it as dark. But even then our mind is susceptible to even brief flashes of light. So much so that even a quick flash is enough to make up perceive a persistent illumination, like how Cathode Ray Televisions work.

Attached: Jan_22_2018_13_52_32.gif (538x294, 2.75M)

Why not just implement GigaIR?

Bruh you can see the flickering of lights if they run in an irregular frequency, shit is annoying as fuck

get a girlfriend and you'll see why most men hate women

I'd rather not. Wife is enough work. Also
>most men hate women
lmao get outside or your bubble more

>wife is enough work
>>most men hate women
how could you contradict yourself so quickly?

Attached: 1542309477680.jpg (850x1202, 305K)

>uses flashing light you can't see to transmit information

What a new and novel idea!

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 105K)

Light = electromagnetic wave
invisible light = electromagnetic wave outside visible spectrum
how is this new?

You think I hate women because I made a playful comment about how relationships take some effort? Do you think Married With Children was a documentary or something lol

like fibrator

>lol
>married with children
just kill yourself my man, your kids are all mutts that play fortnite

fag also new?

seething

>seething
stop larping friend
and going back to your previous post, "hate" may be too strong of a word, sure. but to say that "women take work" really shows how you really feel

It's still not new. There's been a demonstration video floating around for years

So let me get this straight.
We are going back to IR recievers?

Larping? Also of course relationships in general take work, but that doesn't mean I'd hate women for it or think they're not worth it. They absolutely are. The joke was about how I'd take too much effort to have a wife and a girlfriend. You have a weird mindset if you think everyone must share your views and if they don't admit to it, they must be lying. That honestly sounds kinda fucked up.

you seriously need to get laid user. this buttfrustration is not healthy

kek where do you think you are man
that being said I dont even "hate" women
Ive been in a relationship for over 4 years now
this is just the only place you can say such things, and I like seeing what people's responses will be

Strange. But alright.

This.
So... IrDA? In AD 2019? Kek

non-visible electromagnetic radiation causes cancer retard
this is a step in the right direction

Its already in use in some offices in the US actually. The moar you know

sugar causes more cancer than any "electromagnetic" non-ionizing radiation ever does or will
but you dont see people up in arms about that do we
almost like the issues brought forth are only to distract people, while the real problems have big money behind them
and with big money, bought-and-paid-for politicians

OFDM wasn't really cost effective in the past, now you can throw some GS/s sampler at the problem and get decent bandwidth with indirect multipath signals.

They can be so........,.,.. extra

>you just can't see it
>imblying

Enjoy your eye cancer.

>The light has a frequency, you just can't see it.
That's literally wifi though, no?

He hates women because they're uninformed and ignorant, not because they don't have sex with him. Both are possible but I don't know why you think it's because of sex he hates women.

>$900
>100Mbps
that's a yikes from me

Attached: lifi.png (631x575, 55K)

>never see the light of day

Attached: image.jpg (300x302, 181K)

Nope.
is not for mortal fags. is for secure use, military. for example a military tent, where you want wifi but you don't want the network to leak outside the tent (since the light doesn't pass through)

This whole thread is retarded, its visible LEDs, R/G/B/ hidden inside of an otherwise white bulb. A receptor in the receiver can decipher the flashes of the colored LEDs hidden by the white lighting.
Its visible light, just obscured from the end user's eyes.

Military use could be a thing. Right now its just being used in offices that are overloading 2.4ghz and even 5ghz networks with too many devices.

it's a problem with journalism in general; tech journalism isn't really journalism. these faggots don't care if their story is 100% scientifically accurate. the incel frame of mind is what causes that user to blame women.

Source? And what devices have the hardware for that?

It was in the news a year ago, theres at least one company out there with commercial products.

>that's a yikes from me
but the dongle is included!