5G causes cancer

>5G causes cancer

Attached: 1539228123437.png (882x1025, 246K)

it does
i#m shielding my room

we won't have birds anymore, how can you be okay with this?

yes 5G doesnt cause cancer
But was designed by shitty researchers

>village needs a new radio tower
>everybody chips in to stop it from happening because "smoking and asbestos were seen as safe as well years ago"

Just let us fry your brain go-guys.

Nice hoax, lukewarm IQ brainlet.

5ghz wifi or 5g gsm?

>EM radiation is the same as putting chemicals in your body
We're hitting levels of retardation close to /x/

it's a good analogy
nothing wrong with waiting and seeing
if you want 5g move out of village into a city or town
the point of village life is you get away from stuff like noise/pollution/strongem etc

>just put your head in a microwave goy it won't hurt

Attached: 1532789098561.jpg (612x612, 57K)

Attached: 661E8BC4-6A9F-43A4-A3E2-4F5B67341B67.jpg (768x433, 70K)

It's probably just /x/ and Jow Forumstards that love spouting onions memes

how much more corporate cock can you suck?

filtered, thx

Cancer doesn't exist it's a psyop,
Docs make millions off that fake disease.

>turning off your wireless access point radio at night

Attached: images (2).png (521x589, 18K)

>if you don't share my retarded methead redneck trailer trash opinions you must be a corporate shill

>wireless
go back

B/R

tsun tsun

Attached: 1530867917779.jpg (500x750, 224K)

>If you don't share my retarded corporate shill opinions you must be a methead redneck trailer trash

There's no scientific basis for the claim that non ionising radiation causes cancer. The dangers of asbestos and smoking have been known since the early 20th century but were suppressed by industry pressure which cannot happen anymore in the face of US and EU regulatory regimes.

And thats a good thing

Felix is a good guy

>he wants tracking devices on every building
>he wants this to stream his shitty mobile game while walking in public like a mong
>he will gladly pay 10 times more for the same shit he can do on 4g

just cover your house in tinfoil lmao

Your IQ can't be above 60.

t. 60 IQ

Jow Forums causes cancer.

Attached: f93.png (680x598, 299K)

Once 5g fries your brain your IQ will be in the single digits.

Yes in hex.

many countries including Germany will not allow new builds near mobile towers. if you do build there you must have shielding on all wall and pass test to ensure theres no em leaking to inside the buildings. this is based on scientific data the government trusts.
when you talk about scientific data you can cite reports and papers saying its safe or not safe. guess who funds (directly or indirectly) the ones that say it's safe. it's not hard to figure out is it.
i'd advise people to do what they can to protect themselves. up to you.

>not knowing the difference between ionized and non-ionized radiation.

>thinking 5g is non ionising
the shills fooled you then

>Your IQ can't above 60.

Attached: 1507259742712.png (645x729, 40K)

(60)16 = (96)10

Attached: 1509231937901.jpg (645x729, 73K)

>thinking 5g is non ionising

Attached: 1511572730861.png (211x239, 6K)

>not knowing what ion is

Not going anywhere near 5G

Good, FUCK birds

No, point of village life is low property costs and growing crops and animals.

>nobody has mentioned why 5G is different from previous cellular standards yet
>nobody has mentioned 5G mmWave uses spectrum above 24 GHz range
>nobody has mentioned mmWave won't be deployed for years, and all 5G deployment so far is in the sub-6 GHz range used by previous cellular radio standards

Science literacy, everyone.

birds are very important

>implying birds exist in the first place

Attached: 1547959762175.jpg (1024x963, 112K)

...

>this whole thread
>>/x/

Bird are just government surveillance drones and the 5G waves are interfering with their control signals.

Germany also got rid of their atomic power and censored loli. They're not smart people.

Chemlets thinking ionizing matters.

I have gotten my PhD at an electromagnetics research group that was also researching the effects of 5G on humans.
The researchers, especially the group leader, was autistic enough not to care at all about what research outcome would be demanded. It would have been a scientiffical breakthrough if they would have found any effects, but they couldn't.

The research that they were conducting was quite subtle, since all small effects of EM have been ruled out, except for brute force heating at high power (and I think possibly very strong static magnetic field)

They were now focussing to find effects of molecular resonances in cell molecules, that w . Still, nothing was found yet.

I have gotten PhD in magnetoelectric transmitting wavelength interference signal to noise frequencies.
We literally gave kids 4th-stage cancer with 5G experments

>Sources: my ass

sure thing buddy

Brainlets gonna brainlet.

Yes. Ask me anything about electromagnetics. Computational electromagnetics are my speciality.

For obvious reasons I would like to stay anonymous on Jow Forums, so I will not link my dissertation.

I won't react very quickly, cause I'm leaving to get food.

Is beamforming a meme?

this user is right,
our government is made up of roughly 50% study failures, anti technology lunatics and good for nothing leechs

Thats why I am using 6G

>blasting your head with ionic radidation

Attached: 536565654654.jfif.jpg (1250x884, 50K)

>5g is x-rays
How fucking retarded can you be?

fed 180degrees out of phase. what directions θ does this array has max gain G(θ)?

Attached: Screenshot (4).png (326x921, 19K)

>releasing unproven technology
this is how we got lead paint and radeon

Attached: DWsD7d3UMAATwNN.jpg (902x1200, 154K)

If more than one has has the same max, describe all

5G shills confirmed worse than iToddler shills.

Are there any pics of "her" dick?

in your dreams, polxtard

You as much as prove it with your inane replies, which convinces more and more people to be against 5G, almost as if that was your goal all along.

>Jow Forums never shills non-faggots
I'd definitely dick his gf tho

No. Although adaptation for 5G and on mobile devices may take more time.
A technique similar to beamforming is used for measuring the background noise of the universe. Google square kilometer array.
Probably automotive radar will employ it for consumers earlier than mobile phones.
Problem is that beamforming requires an antenna construction a few times larger than the wavelength. 3GHz=10cm wavelenght. 60GHz=5mm wavelength. No beamforming possible for mobile phones at 3GHz. Maybe tablets or laptops could.

I'm reluctant to do your homework. But at an angle where
cos(lambda) = (1/2+n)/2 for n \in \mathds Z
Assuming point sources.

edit: I mean cos(theta) instead of cos(lambda)

I dont know if 5g specifically doesn't cause cancer
I dont even know if radiation from devices cause cancer
but I know this, radiation from home devices 100% has an effect in your body
I suffer from migraines and if I sleep with a phone in my room I get a migraine plus if I turn on my gps and mobile data and hold my phone for a while my hand starts hurting so does a phone give cancer? I dont know but does the prolonged radiation have a negative effect in your body? 100% yes

That is why they are testing it here in east europe to see if we can get health problems and die faster. Noone will object except a few but we are just a colony so whatev.

People are really brainlets.
It's quite simple:
Does something emit IONIZING radiation? If the answer is yes, then that something might pose a cancer risk, otherwise it doesn't.
(Note that I'm only talking about radiation, and not chemicals that are potential carcinogens, for example).

Isn't that sue lightning? The pornstar tranny Anthony Cummia was banging?

>more and more people to be against 5G
Implying you count as "people".

Attached: 1522092066813.gif (250x250, 993K)

it does, newfag

fuck huawei for encouraging this

filtered

What did it say before it was deleted?

go back to huffing raw milk, you dirty californian.

Obviously something that triggered that loser to samefag so transparently.

Attached: thankmraldrin.png (1762x1690, 1.53M)

You can't disprove it either

What's wrong with 4g?
5g is not any faster. Big corp are just selling you shit you don't need.
Signal getting blocked by oxygen molecules are just ridiculous.

It 100% does

>5g is not any faster
Yes it is.
>Signal getting blocked by oxygen molecules are just ridiculous.
No it isn't.
>signal is getting blocked by trees
>we have to install more antennas
>more antennas = more granular control of the network
>current user tracking is precise on hundreds meter radius
>5g tracking is 10x more precise
install 5g, goyim

5g killing people is bullshit (but it has potential to turn us into liberal tranny applefags anyway), what is true and factual is we'll be balls deep in 1984 part II.

tbf cancer can happen from anything

You can't disprove that I will personally prevent all cancer that would otherwise result from 5G networks through the use of my remote healing powers.

I'll bite. what are all the negatives of 5g?

Anything that destroys body causes cancer risk, all EM waves at high enough power pose a risk. Not that it matters for 5G, but you are wrong.

you need to get out the basement village houses cost 2x town house

ah wonderful, just as expected, someone with a PHD
in ELECTROMAGNETC RESEARCH
looking at 5G
JUST SO HAPPENS TO BE BROWSING Jow Forums consumer general
LOL

>what are archives
The first post you replied to, dummy.

Current mobile SoCs already give the baseband full gps access, and there are public, confirmed cases of networks actively tracking their users and selling the data en-masse to advertiaing firms and government orgs.

Not to mention that the baseband has full DMA privileges in almost literally every single chip.

I think tons of pajeets think it kills birds because of that shitty bollywood movie about the phones

It'd have to be so intense that you'd basically be cooked on the inside out before you'd risk developing cancer.

GPS is a passive system. It doesn't send out signals, just receives them. Like a radio.

As I said. There might be more subtle effects. If EM signals are emitted at resonance frequencies of certain proteines, their function might be slightly altered, or they might denaturate quicker. Strange cell behavior might be caused... However, effects like this are still ongoing research and no effects have been observed yet. Also, resonances of proteines in water generally have low Q-factors, making their effects small.

I am bored, sitting in a hotel room waiting for a conferencen to start. Why wouldn't I be at Jow Forums? There's no girls to bang in a field research field like this.

>Also, resonances of proteines in water generally have low Q-factors, making their effects small.
So, it's fucking nothing.

It seems that not all of them are.
google article "
Is it possible to predict electromagnetic resonances in proteins, DNA and RNA?"


I have to say that I myself was also very sceptical about these effects. But seeing some of my best colleagues putting effort in this, means that things aren't all cleared up yet.
I mean, most people claiming effects are totally unreliable and outright annoying. From a social perspective it is a sound idea to say people like that are probably wrong. But there's still research to be done as well.

Exactly.