Discuss retards what do you think ?

Here’s what I got from reading this book, Google is going to fail because AI with consciousness is not possible it’s not what principle of algorithm can have. AI can’t have learning curve of element of surprise even with the help of big data analyse, it can only learn element of surprise by an outside oracle that can update it to behave that way and adapte but that is still an algorithm not consciousness. Silicon Valley are in delusional state the stock market has reached the end of level 6 in Hyper-wave theory, when people finally realise that AI with consciousness is impossible to have every major Silicon Valley company will fail.

I’m a Software Engineer and I can see what he’s referring to, Silicon Valley are really losing track of essence of their science. Fuck this shit I’m going all in Bitcoin protocol now.

youtube.com/watch?v=BjPpntE5Nj4

Attached: fallOfGoogle.jpg (715x1080, 105K)

10/10 word salad can I have some cherry tomatoes with that?

Fuck is this real I have Google stocks

Attached: AE07513E-4D24-4BB0-8A1F-0B76791FE6F8.png (640x628, 150K)

What’s hyperwave ?

>don't know about hyperwave
Oh boi

>STILL in tech
>2019

Wow checked
why no one talked about this ?

1k EOY
Visualize it as often as possible

Attached: aku_lining_up.jpg (700x540, 44K)

This is true. Emulating even basic neural networks on today's computer hardware is insanely inefficient. The only way it's going to work is if we engineer hardware similar to what a human brain looks like, with synapses and blood and neurotransmitters. At that point, it's easier to just genetically modify humans. That's the way I think we'll end up going.

so it's a failed shit

investors are going to dump hard after they discover all Silicon Valley tech is failing

AI doesn't need consciousness to be useful. AI doesn't need consciousness to be able to learn new stuff. Humans don't need conscious AI. Generic AI is inefficient by definition. Application-specific AI is orders of magnitude faster and cheaper.

Comparing Big Data to blockchain is retarded.

Wasn't that book about the rise of a crypto ecosystem?

Computer science has seen very little "science" since the late 80s. There's only a handful people that could actually advance the field and they are all stuck in AI shit and data analysis.

Computer science died few years before the dotcom burst.

Enjoy your future.

I wouldn't say failed. Neural networks are still useful for facial recognition and other shit. It's just not going to evolve into AGI like retarded "futurists" (Elon Musk) think.

> AI doesn't need consciousness to be useful
You saying the promise of Silicon Valley is dead Fuck I'm selling my stocks tomorrow

Hello fren crypto will rise fren

Attached: B22EBAE5-98AE-49B7-B63C-AF66C9EF4CEB.jpg (620x340, 25K)

This shit is interesting

It has never been the promise of Silicon Valley, where the fuck did you get that from ffs?

Silicon Valley is just a deluded nerd circle jerk controlled by greedy short sighted psychopaths. They need a constant influx of dreamy eyed nerds to keep the wheel turning.

The glory of the place is long gone, but the legends from the early days will stay alive for a long time.

whats with autists thinking ai is gonna have a conscious

an algorithim can be multiple times more advanced then human beings without being sentiant

so they deluded investors into shit thing

most investors dont care about what they are buying as long as it gives them profit. so it doesnt mean if silicon valley makes a conscious ai or a talking turd.

>cuckchain
kys

it won't give them profit as Bitcoin will give and guess who get dumped first

>don't understand how bitcoin work
kys

Google is going to fail because they are a shit company and are not competing in the business cloud markets. That and it is just a matter of time before they get broken up. Their business separate are hardly competitive as they require search domination to compete.

kek

>thinks cryptocurrencies will ever be adopted with open ledgers
kys

this

>thinks open decentralised and free market will give up Bitcoin
kys

>thinks having a public historic of all transactions is good and doesn't know companies have trade secrets to protect
kys

Good investors don't get attached to their investment.

Their cloud business is not for the average joe. Only high end AWS shit can compete with them AFAIK.

I suggest you learn english before trying to predict what will happen to Google or AI.

prediction has nothing to do with languages it's clear that Silicon Valley is failing

What the fuck is el boog?

>every major silicon valley company will fail bc they can't make ai with consciousness

am I misinterpreting this? why would they need this to succeed? all they do is sell ads

you realise consciousness is one of the least attractive things about AI? it's interesting, sure, but consciousness is what makes humans shit at the tasks that AI is designed to solve. it's why we can't have slaves. the second we give AI consciousness and genuine personality is the second it becomes useless. AI's success is not in any way predicated on attaining consciousness.