Nasty security bug found and fixed in Linux apt

>remote arbitrary code execution as root on any system installing any package
Bravo Debian
zdnet.com/article/nasty-security-bug-found-and-fixed-in-linux-apt/

Attached: 1543835375714.png (631x523, 273K)

>security bug
Just call ot what it is, shitty code written by enthusiasts instead of engineers, like most linux code

Is Debian officially the worst distro in existence? I tried it once and it was like the Winfag shitposts about Linux, but it actually happened.

If you pay attention, it's an apt bug, not a debian bug
Meaning ALL debian based distros, ie ubuntu, mint, what have you, have this issue

I'm aware of this but Debian has other problems that basically no other distro has.

No.
...Fedora is, though.

Debian hasn't been any good for nearly a decade. It's former reputation has been carrying it all of these years.

Attached: tedu.png (1127x77, 5K)

Ted is my spirit animal

who's that

openBSD dev

Attached: serveimage.jpg (1280x720, 58K)

wtf a chad unix developer
never though I'd see one
wtf how's that even possible

why is he not doing something useful with his time like pounding women?

He can do both, retard.

OpenBSD guy who developed their secure update mechanism

Have you never heard about the Chad hacker knows as the Unix terrorist?

no

Luke Smith?


:3

THEN WHAT IS GOOD

This is Jow Forums. Nothing is good if you don't get laid.

the Jow Forums fags are right
we all do it for the girls

if you aren't doing something for the sake of getting girls, then you are living wrongly

> we all do it for the girls
There are two kinds of things that are done in this world. First kind of things is done to get laid ; the rest is done because you didn't get laid.

i bet this turbochad secretly uses fedora

Gentoo you fucking inbred.
>hurr durr but le redd!t told me it was an ebin maymay
Kill yourself then, redditard.

>just like how the professionals at microsoft and apple never create stupid bugs and have produced vulnerability ridden software

I'm not using either of those though

So uh what do you use then? You don't use microsoft, apple, and "shitty enthusiast code" like linux.

the only OS programmed by actual engineers ofcourse

Attached: the6.png (1360x298, 170K)

the hilarious part about this is that the "leddit army xD" on Jow Forumslinux was arguing that apt doesn't need https because it's secure enough as it is and then not even 12 hours later this bombshell dropped

if you go to their subleddit you can still see the thread that's up talking about how useless https is right beside the thread talking about apt's security breach because of it's refusal to use https.

Attached: Screen_Shot_2018-10-25_at_11.02.15_AM.png (1354x784, 869K)

Attached: 1449516142517.gif (367x219, 523K)

Wait. Are you telling me these walled gar... erm, package repos don't use any TLS?
Reason #1,793,208,225,990,439,099 not to ever touch Linux again.

Attached: spock wtf.gif (300x225, 944K)

Not to mention nobody's bleating that they're automatically secure, don't get malware, are unhackable, etc. like freetards constantly parrot.

no but duuuude it checks the gpgggggg signatures
dude signatures dude
like
they like
it verifies it bro
so its secure, https is like not even useful lol

>openbsd
>professional, non-shitty hobbyist code better than linux
Oh that's funny. OpenBSD. What's next, Plan 9? Hurd? TempleOS?

Ironically enough Hurd is (rather, was) helmed by engineers
Also if you're arguing that openBSD has worse code quality than linux does, then I'd like to definitely like to hear your arguments on why that is