What's the most obese, bloated Linux distro available?
I'm tired of having to configure or install something every time I need to do some task I haven't done previously on the machine. I want to be massively overprovisioned with utilities and drivers, so that when I plug in random widget #246 ten months from now at a random job site I can be confident that it will just werk⢠without needing to spend time on setup.
not him but sadly this is impossible, some packages are mutually exclusive so if you tell apt to literally install every available package it'll be like "no"
Leo Myers
Zorin. The faglords fucking ship wine by default.
Andrew Cooper
slackware full install
Leo Cox
manjaro is definitely not the answer, the arch base means you can never really rely on it. ubuntu might be the best for this case, but I've seen cases of it flubbing often. never tried opensuse, maybe that's the one.
William Richardson
Knoppix It has some weird shit and 40000 packages
Xavier Young
KDE certainly meets the requirement for bloat, but not functionality.
Adrian Gutierrez
It's probably redhat/centos because that's what all the "professionals" use, right?
Leo Hernandez
>KDE >Bloat >KDE can actually run on less than 2GB of RAM >gnome struggles with 4.
Luis Rivera
Deepin, serious answer.
Owen Hughes
Because RAM usage is the only definition of bloat, right? Not complexity, scope, disk space, or anything else.
David Ramirez
>grandpa is confused and scared by new technology
Aiden Collins
by that logic, Windows 10 isn't bloated either (minimum 512mb of ram)
Angel Sanchez
macOS
Angel Bailey
ok.
Easton Allen
anything with gnome
Sebastian Garcia
fedora kde is more bloated than kubuntu. but i think xubuntu takes the cake, compared to other distros with xfce as the DE.
Jason Howard
Windows
Benjamin Reed
try to run w10 with anything less than 4g ram, I fucking dare you
Jacob Gomez
Used a fresh copy of Kubuntu like yesterday and it consumed less than half of that Win10 consumes in RAM
Is Linux really that better at resource consumption?