Poorfags can’t see the symbol

Poorfags can’t see the symbol

Attached: 3C1BD0E2-2780-42CD-A146-1E1F41279656.png (1000x1000, 76K)

hm? i can see it in mspaint after expanding but not in the browser after expanding
whats going on

>when you post a cognito hazard
Called the boys on you OP also I'm immune

Attached: CC9D8457-770F-4D4B-BEEE-6991ECDB0D79.png (223x218, 18K)

It's clearly visible
t. chrome /w Dell ultrasharp

Well I can see it on both my high quality IPS monitor and my shitty gaymer 144hz monitor, what monitor couldn't see this image?

We had this thread two weeks ago, depends entirely on software support.

Same.
>what monitor couldn't see this image?
>depends entirely on software support.
Wrong. Some shitty panels can't show that much of the colorspace.

>547179▶
>Well I can see it on both my high quality
see my post
i literally cant see it in chrome if i expand the image

if i copy the pixels using the snipping tool there is no symbol, but if i copy the pixels using ctrl+c into mspaint I can see it.

>Some shitty panels can't show that much of the colorspace.
Yeah, if the software supports this color space. If it doesn't it crushes it into other color space so everybody can fucking see it.

Very odd. I can only see it when I left click on the title bar of my browser.

Really makes me think, OP.

Attached: Screenshot_20190127-190320.png (1080x1920, 91K)

...

I'm on a Dell Latitude laptop I bought used two and half years ago. I can see it just fine...

i can see it in my browser but not in mpv

If i save the miniature on my phone i can see it, if i open and expand i can see it, and only in this apple-praising like, high consumerit thread i cant if i expand the image

So loading the image into Photoshop and discarding the embedded color profile, the difference between the reds is 14 (255 vs. 241).

Hope that helps, fags. Get better monitors or something that actually understands color profiles.

can see it in thumbnail
can't see it after expanding (Firefox btfo)
can see it after saving and opening in Photo Viewer
really activates my almonds

Converted from 16-bit to 8-bit and removed color profile.

Attached: 1548604285728.png (1000x1000, 25K)

so both chrome and firefox are equally trash

>Crome /w Dell ultrasharp
Tried expanded on Chrome with DELL U2715H and it's not visible

I can see it on a shitty t420 screen, that cost me 80 bucks.

I can see the symbol on safari

I can see in my 180$ smartphone.

oh no, I'm gay!

I can see it fine on my $100 tracfone

Attached: Screenshot 2019-01-27 at 19.16.52.png (1441x937, 151K)

i can see it on my 12 year old lcd display

I'm guessing this has something to do with Apple since you used the shill word "poorfag". Is there a reason people should be watching red symbols on a red background? Sounds pretty bad ergonomically.

When i stare at the red image i start to see dicks in it. Is the symbol dicks?

>t. has no idea what a color space is

Spoiler: dicks are in your eyes.

Cheap and old TN panel here, clearly visible.

and so? i have my own sweeming pool !

I'm questioning OP's motives for this post you fag. Not the technology.

I can't see it in firefox but it's pretty clear in an external image viewer. What the fuck?

On s8+ clover I can see the symbol on the thumbnail but when expanded it disappears.

i still can't see it

Attached: 1548604285728.png (1000x1000, 44K)

> when Jow Forums compression kills your epic le poorfag meme thread

Can't see anything in the thumbnail or when expanded, but the symbol popped up for a split second when I expanded the picture.

My phone is $70 and can see it fine.

Looks like Imagemagick can show it correctly even when Firefox can't.

Boy the foundation shills must have lost Jannie status

I can see it perfectly clearly with firefox on a dell ultrasharp.

ThinkFats BTFO

Its using obscure and often unsupported features of the png file format. Nothing to do with your monitor.

Attached: Screenshot_20190127-124523_Termux.jpg (1080x1287, 163K)

>tfw can't see it on thumbnail or expanded

Attached: 1535255619368.png (285x276, 65K)

Jow Forums (and likely no image board for that matter) has literally never compressed uploaded images, that's what the filesize limit is for you newnigger

I see it in the thumb but not in big
why?

it removes metadata which is a result of compression ackchyually

Metadata is independent of image data, that's why it's called metadata.

chrome?

thumbnail: can see it clearly
Browser: can't see it
XNviewMP, Photoshop, etc: can see it clearly.

Attached: 1243377599625er.jpg (240x320, 16K)

I see it on my phone whats the deal here?

>Phoneposter
>doesn't read the thread
Can't say I'm surprised

Attached: 1298553645048.jpg (396x691, 58K)

Attached: tfw poor.jpg (3840x1080, 451K)

Why? Ive read the thread
There are only retarded conversations
My phone doesen't have decoding nor display issues, so whats the deal?

Attached: 1548619966899.png (1000x1000, 27K)

If you can see it: Congrats, you have HDR.