4k question. pLEASE RESPONd

What's the point of 4k when the human eye can't even see more than 25 pixels a second lol?

Attached: asdasd.png (1200x633, 18K)

That's 2K, not 4K.

yah but human eye cant see more than 25 anime a second

With a 4K 17" panel, the visual acuity distance is 33cm, beyond which the average person (20/20 vision) can't resolve individual pixels on the screen. You literally have to be a small ruler's length away from your screen for it have a point. People who get 4k monitors aren't very bright.

Who buys a 17” 4k lol

>t.aliasfag nvidiot

Laptops are a thing you know

you can make a solid argument for sharpness of text and images, you can also make a solid argument against haven't 20+ different screen resolutions and just making one based on screen size needed

most people who buy 4k monitors get 30+ inch ones.

You know what pisses me off? People that call 1440p 2k.

32" 4k still needs to be scaled to ~125% GUI scale for my usual monitor distance.

I need 38-43" 4k for 100% GUI scale.

That image looks VERY strange.
It states UHD as 4K which is wrong.

Attached: 4K resolution.png (4096x3072, 257K)

I think 24 inches is the perfect size. No homo.

I have the exact opposite. I have a shit 1080 24in monitor at work and I browse Jow Forums at 67% scaling because I just cant deal with large text. It also renders it like complete garbage so I want to actually die whenever I read something long.

why?

With 24" 4k you have to do 175% or 200% GUI scale at that size, just gives you sharper looking 1080p.

I'd rather at least have 32" 4k scaled to 125% and have ~1620p usable desktop resolution.

1080p 24" is 91 PPI

43" 4k is 103 PPI
32" 4k is 137 PPI

both are many times sharper than the 24" 1080p.

if you're scaling to 67% then you're getting roughly 1400p GUI resolution. Though it doesn't have the pixels to do 1:1 pixel mapping.

But at 24" thats about 120 ppi.
To get that with 4k would mean about a 36" panel. That would be 122 ppi.

meant for

Well I would go lower but the font rendering dies

So you'd love a 32" 4k at native 100% scale.

There is no way you'd be able to use a 24" 4k at 100% scale since it's 183 PPI.

32" 4k at 137 PPI is already a fair amount sharper than what you're used to already.

224ppi no scaling masterrace
Eyelets need not apply

Attached: DSC09651.jpg (3000x2000, 1.04M)

I'd rather do 27in 4k.
My laptop used as a third display is 166dpi, no scaling, and its kind of borderline being approx 3ft away while the main 24s are only 2ft away.

not applicable if you're using it from 1 foot.

I said standard posture you fag. It's like two feet
elbows at side, arms out across normal height desk, normal height chair.

>I said standard posture
You didn't

I did in the picture.

Stop being a nigger

I have a 27" 4k monitor. I use it daily with no scaling
~50 cm from monitor

>I have a 27" 4k monitor. I use it daily with no scaling
pics or it didn't happen.

I don't know anyone who comfortably uses 160 PPI at a normal desktop viewing distance with NO GUI scaling.