Well, you’re not broke......are you?

>literally doubling down on facts don't matter
Boy you sure are a gift that keeps on giving.

>*pairs it with my phone*
>YOOOUUUUUUUUUUU

- Sennheiser shill
- Sennheiser is an AKG by Harman competitor
>harmann marketing
How confused can you be.

facts only matter if they're relevant in a given context.

most decisions are based on judgment for the reason that 'facts that are relevant' are actually really scarce, facts are just things to consider, they don't turn into a conclusion on their own without interpretation, which, again, is interpretation.

Opinions without facts don't matter at all. And "well I listed to it" is just that - an opinion. I already said how our ears can make sense of the most awful of sources so I won't repeat myself.

nobody forms opinions without facts, their interpretations vary and some are worth more than others. experience makes for better opinions and judgments. and inversely facts do not add up to conclusions without judgment or as you call it 'opinion'. facts without opinion don't mean anything either.

i don't know who you think is making headphones without doing measurements and testing, but it's not sony and akg's studio division. there's a whoooooole lot more 'creative fact finding' and outright confabulation going into the production of a ridiculous 1500 dollar headphone. for that matter 500 dollars is a ridiculous cost for a headphone, there's no actual valid reasoning that justifies them having that price.

at best it's like the 10 dollar and 100 dollar wine bottles with their labels switched; the amateur connoisseurs always think the 100 dollar bottle is better. this is the market that these exorbitantly priced headphones go to.

Nah m8 I ain't sum poor fuk who would use nigger trash. Get sum real earnips m8.

Attached: pathetic.jpg (672x787, 34K)

"I tried those headphones" is forming opinion without facts and people do this all the time. If you have no numbers you have no facts, simple.

so you care more about what the salesman TELLS you about the headphones (facts being some charts and statements that you saw on a piece of paper) then what you HEAR?

so, the actual SENSORY INPUT from your organs to you is not a fact, but the claims put out by world masters of number-fudging, are, to you, absolute facts?

lmao! you've entered into really absurd territory here, kiddo. you're talking about headphones. 'no numbers no facts!' you don't hear numbers dude, unless its the salesperson whispering them into your ear and telling you they're 'facts'. except they aren't facts, because they aren't relevant. they're just numbers and you're not doing math!

i'll tell you one thing that will exclude you from ever getting a job at any respectable house of production or engineering audio media, and it's the inability to LISTEN!!!!

because what your ears tell you are the ACTUAL facts. not what you see in numbers on a piece of paper. when it comes to sound that's meant to be heard.

thank you for giving me a real insight into the might of the real life no kidding not joking AUDIOPHOOL! haha, i'm gonna show your post to some of my coworkers.

>so, the actual SENSORY INPUT from your organs to you is not a fact
Actually, yes, and you would know that if you were to do any research. Accuracy of the headphones doesn't depend on whether you like them or not AT ALL. In some cases less accurate headphones even sound "better" to people by masking the imperfections of the recording. Is that all the matters to you?