Does anyone here run Arch on their personal/home server? If so, how is it, compared to debian stable or centOS?

Does anyone here run Arch on their personal/home server? If so, how is it, compared to debian stable or centOS?

Attached: archlogo.png (600x600, 26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/DirtyCow
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Why would you run Arch on a server? Genuine question.

Just curiosity. I'm thinking of migrating from Debian to someone else because APT is a bloody dependency nightmare.

It's doable if you're willing to put in the effort to keep it updated and maintained, but it's not low-maintenance the way Debian Stable or centOS would be.

>running Arch on a system that should just werk
>running Arch at all

Attached: 1505004053032.png (1233x957, 173K)

Running rolling release on a sever does sound rather interesting but I feel like it'd be really impractical since you'd have to constantly update your server and then fix stuff that arises from Arch being Arch.

Basically what said.

>server
>arch

Attached: costanza.png (600x629, 429K)

I'm repurposing an old "rig" into essentially a hashcat server. Been thinking of installing Arch, mainly because it will be easier to set it up exactly how I want. I want to setup wakeonlan, remote LUKS unlocking via SSH, and get correct drivers for hashcat/johntheripper installed, maybe some mining software for lulz. I get that Arch may be a pain when updating because it's rolling release, but I've been using it as my daily driver for 2 years now with no problems, and for my usecase I don't mind a little downtime or whatever for maintenance.

>Arch on their personal/home server
psthhhhhrasssssthhh
hahahahaha
nice troll op hahahahahahaha
imagine running arch for anything other than to
stand next to kool and his gang and post in desktop threads
LMFAO - youre a genius troll op