>end-to-end encryption
End-to-end encryption
Anthony Russell
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Cooper Rodriguez
>end-to-zuckerberg-to-end encryption
Jonathan Miller
>end-it-all encryption
Camden Powell
>ass-to-ass
Isaac Collins
aka, whatsapp.
Long story short, if the code is not open, you cannot trust it to encrypt your communications without mining them first.
Carter Sanders
kek I'm going to start saying this
Jackson Mitchell
>if the code is not open, you cannot trust it to encrypt your communications without mining them first
Objectively not true. Just inspect your network traffic and you can easily verify whether your communications were encrypted or not.
I'm all for open source code, but don't make up bullshit ass excuses.
Samuel Evans
how do you check if the encryption used does not have a backdoor that let's zuckerberg to read your messages?
Oliver Carter
Angel Howard
What's wrong with E2E?
Ian Brooks
It's disgusting how widespread whatsapp is.
Julian Williams
>who needs security? nothing to hide nothing to fear.
Nathan Williams
peer-to-peer internet
Bentley Bell
Marketing gimmick
Joshua Rivera
>onion-to-onion encryption
Jackson Jones
t. George W. Bush just before passing the Patriot Act
David Mitchell
It totally disregards what happens in between you and your recipient as if it doesn't exist and you shouldn't give two shits about it because they told you it's irrelevant in this day and age.
Jonathan Davis
Do you own anything between you and the recipient. Then botnet
David Perry
You can cripple a cryptosystem very subtly. You could introduce a side channel vuln, you could use sometimes not-so-random IVs and such. A careful examination of the code to confirm that you're implementing a well examined algorithm in a sane way is critical. Otherwise it could be a decade before anyone discovers the "flaw".
Kevin Campbell
lol
Carter Parker
this