• 7 effects have each been repeatedly reported following Wi-Fi & other EMF exposures. • Established Wi-Fi effects, include apoptosis, oxidat. stress &: • testis/sperm dysfunct; Neuropsych; DNA impact; hormone change; Ca2+ rise. • Wi-Fi is thought to act via voltage-gated calcium channel activation. • One claim of no Wi-Fi effects was found to be deeply flawed.
Repeated Wi-Fi studies show that Wi-Fi causes oxidative stress, sperm/testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG changes, apoptosis, cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload. Each of these effects are also caused by exposures to other microwave frequency EMFs, with each such effect being documented in from 10 to 16 reviews. Therefore, each of these seven EMF effects are established effects of Wi-Fi and of other microwave frequency EMFs. Each of these seven is also produced by downstream effects of the main action of such EMFs, voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) activation. While VGCC activation via EMF interaction with the VGCC voltage sensor seems to be the predominant mechanism of action of EMFs, other mechanisms appear to have minor roles. Minor roles include activation of other voltage-gated ion channels, calcium cyclotron resonance and the geomagnetic magnetoreception mechanism. Five properties of non-thermal EMF effects are discussed. These are that pulsed EMFs are, in most cases, more active than are non-pulsed EMFs; artificial EMFs are polarized and such polarized EMFs are much more active than non-polarized EMFs; dose-response curves are non-linear and non-monotone; EMF effects are often cumulative; and EMFs may impact young people more than adults.
>it's killing us >but it's too convenient to give up
Joseph Perez
You assume I care about being alive. If they can suggest something to fill it's place then sure but it's pointless to talk about something that we can't and won't fix. I'm happy to use ethernet while a home but that won't work while I'm out of the house
Joshua Taylor
>it's an /x/ thread
Carson Adams
Seems about as harmful as the other goodies.
Joseph Wilson
>Established Wi-Fi effects, include apoptosis, oxidat. stress
In humans, oxidative stress is thought to be involved in the development of ADHD,cancer, Parkinson's disease, Lafora disease,Alzheimer's disease,atherosclerosis, heart failure, myocardial infarction, fragile X syndrome, sickle-cell disease, lichen planus, vitiligo, autism, infection, chronic fatigue syndrome, and depression and seems to be characteristic of individuals with Asperger syndrome.
Anthony Bailey
5G
Jaxon Davis
>the geomagnetic magnetoreception mechanism
Magnetoreception (also magnetoception) is a sense which allows an organism to detect a magnetic field to perceive direction, altitude or location. For the purpose of navigation, magnetoreception deals with the detection of the Earth's magnetic field.
humans have a cryptochrome (a flavoprotein, CRY2) in the retina which has a light-dependent magnetosensitivity. CRY2 "has the molecular capability to function as a light-sensitive magnetosensor"
magnetite can be found in various parts of the brain including the frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes, brainstem, cerebellum and basal ganglia. Iron can be found in three forms in the brain – magnetite, hemoglobin (blood) and ferritin (protein), and areas of the brain related to motor function generally contain more iron. Magnetite can be found in the hippocampus. The hippocampus is associated with information processing, specifically learning and memory. However, magnetite can have toxic effects due to its charge or magnetic nature and its involvement in oxidative stress or the production of free radicals. Research suggests that beta-amyloid plaques and tau proteins associated with neurodegenerative disease frequently occur after oxidative stress and the build-up of iron. Some researchers also suggest that humans possess a magnetic sense, proposing that this could allow certain people to use magnetoreception for navigation
Isaac Hill
The only evidence the author cites for wifi causing oxidative stress is a study on mice from Turkey
Cooper James
Overall, mice and humans share virtually the same set of genes
Cooper Cox
Both the mouse and human genomes contain about 3.1 billion base pairs (or chemical letters). Only about 5 percent of the sequence consist of protein-coding regions (genes). More than 90 percent of the genome is non-coding DNA, sometimes called "junk" DNA, that has no known function. Because of the vast amount of non-coding DNA, it is very hard to recognize the genes simply by looking at one sequence alone; even the best of today's computational programs fail to identify many coding sequences and misidentify others. It is similarly difficult to identify regulatory regions within DNA - the "switches" that turn gene expression on or off, up or down - as they exist only as poorly defined "consensus" sequences. On average, the protein-coding regions of the mouse and human genomes are 85 percent identical; some genes are 99 percent identical while others are only 60 percent identical. These regions are evolutionarily conserved because they are required for function. In contrast, the non-coding regions are much less similar (only 50 percent or less). Therefore, when one compares the same DNA region from human and mouse, the functional elements clearly stand out because of their greater similarity. Scientists have developed computer software that automatically aligns human and mouse sequences making the protein-coding and regulatory regions obvious.
genome.gov/10001345/importance-of-mouse-genome/
Chase Brown
... going outside for long periods of time can cause skin cancer. It's possible to get cancer just from eating a banana. Anything and everything is a threat to the body. Luckily for you, these dangers are negligible because EVEN WITH ALL OF THESE THINGS, THE LIFE EXPECTANCY OF AN AVERAGE PERSON IS SKYROCKETING. Besides, if you *really* are paranoid or sth, just move to one of these radio silence zones, primarily meant to allow radio-based telescopes to be able to see into space.
Carson Taylor
>Established Wi-Fi effects >testis/sperm dysfunct; Neuropsych; DNA impact; hormone change
>oxidative stress, sperm/testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG changes, apoptosis, cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload
Carson Ramirez
Steve, a study from a third world country that has never been replicated is not proof of anything. A 5 watt microwave transmitter cannot cause DNA damage.
Ayden Butler
Apoptosis is a process of programmed cell death that occurs in multicellular organisms. Biochemical events lead to characteristic cell changes and death. These changes include blebbing, cell shrinkage, nuclear fragmentation, chromatin condensation, chromosomal DNA fragmentation, and global mRNA decay
Isaiah Hill
and please, do elaborate on how this changes things in any way, shape or form? We've had reproduction solutions that deal with low sperm count for decades.(IVF and whatnot) As for the rest.... >Neuropsych I don't even know what this means desu >DNA impact Again, something that the human body has been evolving to deal with from millennia. WiFi in this case is the least of your worries. >Hormone change I can quite literally change my hormones by jacking off. How would this affect me again?
Christian Clark
wires
Cameron Campbell
>Apoptosis is a process of programmed cell death that occurs in multicellular organisms. Biochemical events lead to characteristic cell changes and death. These changes include blebbing, cell shrinkage, nuclear fragmentation, chromatin condensation, chromosomal DNA fragmentation, and global mRNA decay
Washington State University, 638 NE 41st Avenue, Portland, OR 97232-3312, USA Martin L. Pall mendeley.com/authors/7005344391/
Anthony Miller
>Apoptosis is a process of programmed cell death that occurs in multicellular organisms. True. That process is part of the complex mechanism that keeps us alive. >Biochemical events lead to characteristic cell changes and death. They can, yes. They can also be beneficial like most such "events" like when you eat food. >These changes include blebbing, cell shrinkage, nuclear fragmentation, chromatin condensation, chromosomal DNA fragmentation, and global mRNA decay Yes. They also include generation of new cells, removal of damaged cells, repair of salvageable cells.
Just KYS and get this over with you brainlet scum.
• 7 effects have each been repeatedly reported following Wi-Fi & other EMF exposures. • Established Wi-Fi effects, include apoptosis, oxidat. stress &: • testis/sperm dysfunct; Neuropsych; DNA impact; hormone change; Ca2+ rise. • Wi-Fi is thought to act via voltage-gated calcium channel activation. • One claim of no Wi-Fi effects was found to be deeply flawed.
>The author of this work provides a series of evidences to demonstrate the threat that Wi-Fi networks pose to human health. For this purpose, it carries out a review of articles without a detailed methodology, inclusion or exclusion criteria, neither temporary, search keywords, etc., which results in the inclusion of a biased and interested series of inadequate articles to prove his thesis. It focuses mainly on 7 effects: oxidative stress, sperm and infertility, neuropsychiatric and neurological effects, cellular DNA damage, Calcium overload, endocrine changes, and cellular apoptosis. Likewise, it provides a detailed list of non-thermal effects with a no less numerous list of articles and reviews, in almost every occasion includes his own works (8 papers cited 28 times along the text). From the careful analysis of the bibliography provided, it appears that no articles have conclusive effects on human effects. In the worst case, he refers to parts of the Bioinitiative report that has been questioned for its bias.
Ethan Peterson
Exactly, all of these risks are several orders of magnitude higher with cosmic and terrestrial radiation. Microwaves as a whole have very marginal effects. If you count a single study as "Established" you might as well say that feminist glacer studies is an established field of science. There are five citations, 4 of which are "Comments on" and "Response to".
>It focuses mainly on 7 effects: oxidative stress, sperm and infertility, neuropsychiatric and neurological effects, cellular DNA damage, Calcium overload, endocrine changes
>Magnetoreception (also magnetoception) is a sense which allows an organism to detect a magnetic field to perceive direction, altitude or location. For the purpose of navigation, magnetoreception deals with the detection of the Earth's magnetic field. humans have a cryptochrome (a flavoprotein, CRY2) in the retina which has a light-dependent magnetosensitivity. CRY2 "has the molecular capability to function as a light-sensitive magnetosensor"magnetite can be found in various parts of the brain including the frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes, brainstem, cerebellum and basal ganglia. Iron can be found in three forms in the brain – magnetite, hemoglobin (blood) and ferritin (protein), and areas of the brain related to motor function generally contain more iron. Magnetite can be found in the hippocampus. The hippocampus is associated with information processing, specifically learning and memory. However, magnetite can have toxic effects due to its charge or magnetic nature and its involvement in oxidative stress or the production of free radicals. Research suggests that beta-amyloid plaques and tau proteins associated with neurodegenerative disease frequently occur after oxidative stress and the build-up of iron.Some researchers also suggest that humans possess a magnetic sense, proposing that this could allow certain people to use magnetoreception for navigation
Adrian Smith
In conclusion, from the title to the conclusions of Pall's article are not based on adequate evidence. A dangerous extrapolation of some in vitro and animal findings is carried out, even at frequencies and levels of exposure very different from those provided by Wi-Fi networks, to warn about unlikely effects on human health that, in any case, the evidence would justify how “an important threat”. At the usual exposure levels (Sagar et al., 2017), it does not seem appropriate to think about any biological effects due to the low penetration of Wi-Fi waves, so the publication of this frightening article, can be misinterpreted by part of society concerned, even at pathological levels, by this type of technology. The errors, bias, a non-existing methodology, the interested choice of the articles, as well as the conclusions not based on human evidences, indicate that it is an intentional academic misconduct, so I ask for the retraction of this article by the journal.
OP needs to stop spamming bullshit.
nice schizoposting
Ayden Morris
You notice that he couldn't get it published in a legit science journal? Fucks sake, learn to read nigger.
Owen Carter
>low penetration of Wi-Fi waves
2 billion people at the same time.
Dominic Morgan
all of the above
Joshua Edwards
when the human rates his evolutionary progress as success in a sea of sickness, cancer, death, and denies the things he cannot see because convenience is his lowest state of awareness
John Bennett
I dont give a shit.
Nathaniel Bell
Fuck off, schizo. Why don’t jannies ban mentally ill posters?
It appears that OP is the living proof of how dangerous Wi-Fi is to sanity.
Nicholas Smith
Stone tablets
Jaxon Cruz
Yes, it's dem damn death ray waves, not polluted air and water, shit food drenched in dubious chemicals, legal substance abuse and terrible living habits that cause this. That's why people in countries with better quality of living, including death ray coverage, are significantly healthier than US Citizens.
Ryder Cox
>can only hold breath for 19 seconds >Meanwhile I can do 3 minutes+ How
Connor Jones
>what do you suggest we use instead A cable.
>5G That's much worse than wifi, so is 4G. The solid scientific evidence that 4G causes Alzheimer is enormous.
If you look you'll find that there are hundreds of independent studies showing harmful effects of microwave radiation going back to the 70s. You just have to spend some time reading up on the subject.
Florescent lightbulbs do contain mercury which is a health hazard. If you knock a lamp over or something and it breaks then you have a problem. They are, however, not 5G devices.
I'm sorry but the fact that you felt the need to comment on the 5G label slapped on the lightbulb speaks volumes. You're doomed to never ever being taken seriously because you constantly broadcast signals of not understanding simple communication. There are some eloquent schizoids who can pull it off, you seem to be hopeless.
Owen Rogers
>babies literally dying in the womb because of 5G LED streetlamps >5G iS nOt DaNgEroUs
It's not junk DNA, many of the parts that don't encode proteins are where the DNA "programs" how much to express the parts that actually do code for proteins
Dylan Long
>>babies literally dying in the womb because of 5G LED streetlamps [citation needed]
Colton Stewart
Build your own Faraday cage.
James Gutierrez
Guys it looks like a pentagram from the thumbnail
Daniel Jackson
Mark Steele's report
Angel Cox
have thick house walls coat the outside in special paint
Nicholas Davis
No but seriously
Oliver Bell
We'd be colonizing mars by now if it wasn't for niggers like OP
James Smith
but Im in a mega city apartment block
Sebastian Carter
What would you even do on Mars tho? There are, like, rocks and dust and some ice maybe? Plus some shitty atmosphere and radiation.
Eli Sullivan
Create Von Neumann probes to scour the landscape for every last bit of usable resource to then build a base. Extend operations, go to places which are harder to reach from Earth.
Christopher Price
Also lower gravity fucking you up. Unless we find a way to blast the atmosphere off of Venus, we will never colonize another planet in our solar system. It's all going to be space stations.
Christopher Parker
fuck martian bitches
Mason Kelly
Who cares I want to die anyway
David Lee
The article is strange. It repeated refers to studies on microwaves damaging effects and refers to studies showing no substantial evidence for its claims yet insists that they are true.
It seems like they're just trying to take general effects of high power EMFs and apply them to Wi-Fi without even acknowledging the difference in magnitude.
The only real claim here is that EMFs have effects aside from thermal changes. The effect on geomagnetic field doesn't seem relevant to anything besides migratory animals. The oxidative stress is moot since nearly anything produces oxidative stress. The voltage gated calcium channel activation is worth looking into.
This kind of fearmongering is irresponsible and the authors shouldn't make such grandiose claims.
>muh cancer waves Cool, I love 90s roleplay. Are guys excited for tonight's episode of Friends?
Daniel Adams
>wifi makes the frogs gay NASA exposed
Anthony Miller
In that case, would you be so kind as to link a peer reviewed study in a reputable medical journal?
Justin Murphy
Like meat and cars
Asher Morgan
>You assume I care about being alive Conceited faggot nobody cares about YOU. Stop making everything about YOU. You'd be happier if you learned to care and appreciate others
Colton Watson
>microwaves >oxidative stress You don't understand what "(non-)ionizing radiation" means, do you? Bet you think "radiation is bad".
Samuel Evans
Also, I'd add >milliwatts of non-ionizing radiation >doing almost anything Pick one
Asher Nguyen
This. It would be reasonably understandable if someone stood inches in front of a 100 watt long range LoS wifi transmitter 24/7 developing problems but most phones and home wifi routers don't even output 1 watt.
Nathaniel Torres
Thankfully there is a way we can save ourselves from wifi, computers, air conditioners
Oh, they also forget the inverse square law. Any field with a spherical propagation pattern will decay in proportion to 1/(distance2), which is to say: very quickly.
Jack Jenkins
internet cable
Lucas Hughes
I'm 80% sure this is the same guy who's been spamming /sci/ for the past few years because he's using some of the same images and links.
This is who you're talking to when you respond to a post talking about how microwave pulses/emf/rf/vlf/whatever is bad for you and will wreck your life through vgccs. The following posts outline one man's mental illness and egotistical delusions. It's pointless to argue with him.
IF YOU ONLY READ ONE LINK READ THIS ONE: warosu.org/sci/thread/S7412900#p7419557 He's a dumb tweaker who went nuts as a teenager and melted his brain with drugs afterwards.
warosu.org/sci/thread/S8205938#p8206096 Autistic textwall about how he's a clever superhuman with undiagnosed MS and self diagnosed bipolar and an insane skeleton
warosu.org/sci/thread/S8230504#p8245636 Spends half a thread freaking out about MUH JAW MUH SUPER HEALING MUH LOGIC and CT scans, plus some of his wacky medical adventures.
Why do so many of you use this line of reasoning? It's self-destructive
Jordan Collins
Documenting some guy's autism is even more autismal.
Carter Green
Posting on Jow Forums is already maximum autism
Jayden Morgan
>DNA impact
If we could just use WIFI routers to induce mutations in lab cultures, why aren't we doing it?
Ryder Murphy
>Wi-Fi is thought to act via voltage-gated calcium channel activation
This would be trivial to reproduce and measure if it were real.
Michael Wood
For what purpose? Why not make the Earth a better place to live first instead of shitting it up with every form of pollution imaginable? What makes you think you'll be able to live sustainably on those new planets, when you can't even do so on a planet with pre-built ecosystems in which mankind has evolved? Based on our recent actions, we can predict how expanding into space will turn out. Mankind will invade and occupy new planets, leaving behind their old dead planet, then pollute and rape the new environment until it's literally uninhabitable, and then be forced to jump to a new planet. Is this the future you want for your descendants?
Regardless of your delusional fantasies of spacefaring, Mother Earth is in the process of retaliating against the selfish excesses and unsustainable practices of mankind's global neoliberal civilization as we speak.
Julian Cox
cringe this smells like a false flag too, you're probably the one who made all those posts to discredit the real, known effects that EM radiation has on the integrity of the blood-brain barrier maybe you work for big wireless
Oliver Lee
>real, known effects that EM radiation has on the integrity of the blood-brain barrier Such as?
Dylan Butler
Jow Forums needs to stop bringing their garbage here, fuck off
