I am not fond of rust either. Do you have any of substance to say?
>t. don't know what t. is
Redpill me on systemd
Kayden Russell
Tyler Phillips
>Do you have any of substance to say?
Yes, trannyism is a mental illness, now go hang yourself.
Kevin Allen
can't even reboot
Hunter Roberts
All these hatred is why nobody should listen to the systemd haters, you're like a sports announcer commentating a game being played by a pack of niggers who raped and murdered your wife and children and got away with it, you've lost the ability to be objective and nobody should ever listen to whatever you have to say. If I challenge you to say one thing systemd did right you'd probably reply with some worthless nonsense like "systemd did nothing right".
Lincoln Butler
t. postmodernist
Nolan Bennett
you can switch between read-only and read-write on the fly in linux, just a matter of;
mount thing place -o remount,rw
so yes, you can mount it read-only, then switch to read-write only when it's needed
Lucas Martin
this. systemd is the way forward, even with its current flaws (that will get eventually get fixed). people will look back at this whole thing just like they did with pulseaudio. when pulseaudio was first introduced, it was a nightmare because it was adopted without it being ready (thanks, distribution maintainers).
now pulseaudio just werks and I wouldn't want use a linux system without it.
the only ever way they worked was by adding compile time options and specific packaging per distribution, which requires compilation per distribution.
if you don't call this model broken, then I don't know what else to tell you.
his official response is:
0pointer.de
just because trannies and fags use the language doesn't make it any worse. judge the tool on its feature set and tooling, instead of the people that use it.
do you not use knives? trannies use knives as well, you know, better not use them then. shit they also use forks and plates, sleep on a bed and live inside a house. fuck, you're going to have to move to the jungle to escape the things that trannies use.
Aaron Perry
You're either completely right or missing the point entirely.
efivarfs should, by the laws of common sense, be mounted as read-only, and remounted as read-write only temporarily when you need to write to it. If that's what you mean, then yes, it can and should have been done this way.
(If you mean that the user who issued rm -rf / should have remounted efivarfs as read-only, then you're retarded. But surely you aren't, right?)
Ayden Watson
Judging by the wording
>Can't it just
"it" most likely refers to the systemd utility that wants to write to efivarfs
Carter Sullivan
By the laws of common sense your motherboard shouldn't hardbrick from erasing efivars, and if it does take it to the chink you bought it from.