Stop using IPv4

Stop using IPv4.

Attached: f1c3fe9d9ca9e4374534e2957bc6fa96e7e572112547aa8508db6980d2ae4dfc.jpg (317x333, 101K)

Jow Forums requires IPv4.

I can't, my ISP doesn't provide IPv6 yet.

Go to IPv6 only.
get off my internet we dont want you here,
you fucking IPv6 nazi go on, fuck off

You are holding back progression.
Sorry to hear.

What did you just say about me you little bitch etc etc navy seal pasta etc
I'll have you know that I am actually a progressive and rather than promote IPv6 I would prefer to just implement a CoC on IPv4 so that we could reclaim all those 32 bit addresses by conquering places such as the whole of Africa, India, and Asia, by sending in the armies of the west and throwing those morons off the internet

IPv6 addressing is AIDS

Attached: Captureend.png (853x465, 376K)

My ISP only provides /64 prefix delegation.

Attached: 1549487598310.jpg (274x274, 10K)

not until they add NAT to IPv6

My ISP only supports IPv4

Tell that to my ISP, fuccboi

Why is this a problem?

>wanting one unique ipv6 address associated with you forever

Nice try NSA

My ISP gives me both.

>getting a single IP6 address instead of a range
Get a non-shit ISP.

>not using both

The standard does not prohibit NAT. DNAT and MASQUERADE support for netfilter6 were added in kernel 3.9.

># CONFIG_IPV6 is not set
>USE="-ipv6"
>GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="ipv6.disable=1"
Not today, CIA.

Attached: 1542116852537.jpg (395x398, 15K)

NAT is not security.
The only reason it got popular was because of the scarcity of IPv4 addresses.

Shut up varg

ipv6 larger address
much easier to track
>um, no sweety

Do not fall for the lies, of CIA nigger spies.

NO!
I only listen to Jordan Peterson.

The addressing scheme used to contain your device's MAC address...
So there's that...

That wasn't the addressing scheme in general. It was specifically how the early versions of SLAAC worked. If you used a static address you weren't affected. It got fixed well before IPv6 started getting rolled out to most clients though, and it doesn't look like it required any changes to the protocol itself.

Still, doesn't exactly inspire confidence from a privacy standpoint. Just sayin'.

>holding back progression
Good, suck a dick

Windows mentality with 32 bit.

multilib config linux isn't going away any time soon

Stop using Jow Forums.

Attached: 1724.jpg (676x600, 129K)