JUST GIVE ME THE OPTION TO SHOW ME THE FUCKING PAGE HOLY SHIT
Firefox hate
Alexander Garcia
Jayden Johnson
fuck sjwfox
Ryan King
>refuses to load an insecure site due to inappropriate configuration
>JUST GIVE ME THE OPTION TO SHOW ME THE FUCKING PAGE HOLY SHIT
>loads an insecure site due to inappropriate configuration
>OMG YOU FUCKING FREETARDS WHY DID YOU LOAD MY BANKS WEBSITE OVER HTTP REEEEEE I'M A MASSIVE IDIOT
Landon Fisher
>implying this error did not happen for me on https:/www.Jow Forums.org/
Nice assumption though.
Xavier Bailey
I screamed at Firefox a lot a while back because websites would fail with a screen like that. Notably Amazon, who probably wasn't just screwing up their TLS config.
And the error message said "It looks like some of your security settings might be causing this, do you want me to change them?" But it DOESN'T FUCKING TELL ME WHAT THOSE SETTINGS ARE. Yes, I want you to automatically turn off some number of security settings with no indication which ones, how fucking helpful, you fucking Mozilla retards.
(it later proved to be OCSP, FF was trying to actually contact an OCSP server and failing to get through, and killing the TLS handshake over it. Why the fuck a browser would do that I don't know, I thought stapling was invented exactly so that that wouldn't be needed)
Daniel Taylor
>JUST GIVE ME THE OPTION TO SHOW ME THE FUCKING PAGE HOLY SHIT
It's not firefox's fault. Websites send a special header telling browsers to only visit on https, so if https is broken then you have no way to visit http. Firefox is just following standards.
Landon Williams
Yes, because Jow Forums absolutely forbids HTTP connections.
Asher Bailey
Too easy.
Jaxon Reed
>it's not firefox's fault it won't give you an option to bypass when even fucking chrome does after all firefox is marketed towards the masses and an option aimed at power users and developers would just be too scary
Luis Morales
>He thinks it's just Firefox
Welcome to the new death.
Angel Scott
Oh look. A dev claiming he needs to keep breaking the internet over bullshit "security" concerns. Computer programmers are literally stuck in a fucking "Iraq has WMDs" loop.
Luis Brooks
how exactly is that "breaking the internet"?
Owen Jones
>not able to visit websites
>this is fine, I don't see the problem
When the revolution comes, computer programmers are at the top of the list.
Isaac Stewart
broken TLS is not fine, it is entirely sensible to fail safe.
Brayden Bennett
about:telemetry
No way to turn off data collection
Gabriel Young
Why did Fennec changed it's icon to Firefox's? What the hell is going on?
Nicholas Ross
It's probably because your botnet antivirus is MITMing your connection.
Charles Wilson
>broken TLS is not fine
Fuck you, I'll decide what sites I browse to are fine and which sites are not fine with broken TLS. I don't give a shit if some rando can sniff this worthless Jow Forums post that I'm sending over http; nothing of value can be gained by reading this, and that goes for most of this fucking website.
Carson Thompson
Anyone having the ability to sniff traffic at all on the web is bad, regardless of whether you care about whether your traffic in particular gets sniffed.
Herd immunity, only to surveillance instead of viruses. Don't be an antivaxxer.
Aiden Gray
You don't care, maybe. But there are millions of retards out there who don't know what they're doing and need their hand held every step of the way, lest they make a mistake they would later regret. Let me remind you that phishing works. Like other aspects, security is also a selling point of browsers.
Cooper Martin
You do realize that makes no sense, right? If a government wants surveillance of a particular person, they'll be able to filter by source IP address regardless of whether any other traffic passing across the network is encrypted. It's similar for surveilling a destination. TLS does nothing to hide who is communicating with who, only what they're saying. Proxying is the only solution to surveillance, and there's no real difference in effectiveness for that between 100% of traffic being encrypted and only a few percent of traffic being encrypted. Please show me any mathematical proofs you have to the contrary, I would be interested to see them.
Joshua Young
Have security features, they prohibit me to access a potentially malicious site.
>thats bad
also doesn't know about about:config to open that vulnerability.
Joseph Wilson
I dislike firefox and I'll be jumping ship whenever an alternative pops up.
>ublock origin / uMatrix / httpseverywhere... the reasonable civilized man's toolbox.
>something like greasemonkey for optimal shitposing
>basic theming
>Nazeka or similar
>Bypass Paywall or similar
>This one thing that solves captcha or similar
Maybe Brave in the near future
Jackson Johnson
There still people unironically using mozzarella firecucks, lol.
>firefox is botnet
your fault, you don't need it, its for your own good, what about chrome, think of the children, goy, something vague implication, go back to pol