Post retro-futuristic computer stuff
RetroFuturism
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
necopost.com
s3d.sourceforge.net
youtube.com
youtube.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
youtube.com
ergoemacs.org
archive.org
c0t0d0s0.org
youtube.com
github.com
myredditnudes.com
twitter.com
>Xorg
See, it is used even in future, fuck wayland.
and it's still a resource hog too
>retro-futuristic
...Because the screen is dirty?
yes
Why did super bloated GUIs take over so much? Like all CLI apps work 3000% faster without all that unecessary bloat which comes shipped with software nowadays...
Shit, I like this sort of color.
forget the colour I like the shit obscuring it
To enable stupid people to use things that they shouldn't be using.
This is actually p cool
>presumably a machine abandoned around the time of the first movie, 1982
>Xorg (didn't exist before 2004)
>i386 (didn't exist before 1985)
>scsi (questionable, standardized in 1986, but existed in 1982, technically)
>sun4m (conflicts with i386 in that it's an architecture which uses a SPARC cpu, also it's from 1992)
why is "up 8 days" circled?
my shitty core2 duo laptop is at 27 days, only that low because i took it on a business trip a month ago
because it's from a movie which implies the machine was abandoned in 1982, and discovered again in 2010, so it should have an uptime of at least 28 years
had potential
>implying computers cant have multiple cpu architectures
Why is bareknuckle green on black interfaces a common retrofuturistic characteristic?
We've gone the opposite with complicated but AESTHETIC OSs with complex programs. They were a bad idea too, as they're made users less efficient and more reliant on stupid dumbed down programs.
omg those fucing retards
its like the one fucking detail that would have been coolest to get right
Might be useful for admins of large networks.
In this day and age the best interface is a terminal multiplexer like GNU Screen and a file manager like vifm.
alright, it is meant to be a super high tech machine, so i'll just call it questionable that it lists both (they're both still too new, though)
There's a lot of money in pandering to the stupid.
Well to be fair, for a time this is what a lot of screens could only really show, either black and green , black and amber , or black and white.
>3d file manager
>Without having to buy an indigo
fuck yeah
That's a 3D display server, a full Xorg replacement that comes with a 3D file manager.
A 3D file manager only is this
How dope would it be if terminals could draw graphics other than text characters.
see DEC sixel graphics
Honest question, how do you know all of this? Did you just memorize those dates or are you just old and happen to remember the years?
unleash the autism
github.com
hack the gibson!
It's a Unix system
I know this
Geometry graphics like ReGIS? Pictures like sixels? Some framebuffer environments support them like yaft for sixel) and hterm for regis, also Xterm supports modes for displaying those.
based and skynetpilled
How is this different from ueberzug?
>python
i knew a couple by heart, like Xorg coming out in 2004 (since it's the first year i used linux, so it was hard to miss)
i386 i knew was later than 1982, but not exactly how much later
the other two stood out enough to double check their dates on wikipedia, scsi i was really unsure on, but i looked it up just out of curiosity
i'm not that old.
Only a divine intellect could design such a thing
you mean a graphics terminal?
theres a few options for those, such as sixel graphics, tektronics vector graphics, or even, y'know... X
Just looked up ReGIS and that looks dope as shit
youtube.com
Although I can't imagine any use from me other than just showing off
I can't speak for everybody but I do imagine a reason and has to do with work
>gnuplot
Welp, is not hard to imagine what I would use this for
Is that the only difference? I get the feeling that they actually do different things, but I'm not very knowledgeable.
lel
wireframe naked girls?
Idiot capitalists came to realize that computers could be used as a massive money making platform if mass consumer adoption occurred. For that to occur software needed to be usable without having any idea whatsoever as to what it is doing. This lead into what we have today.
Oh, but you're wearing a dress on our first date.
Hack the planet!!
Soyuz-TMA control software
Except it's actually past. This is the computer that stayed up for 20 years because Kevin Flynn couldn't exit vim.
ergoemacs.org
>sun4m i386
even when they try to make something that looks convincing they still fail every time
why
Graphics terminals have been around even longer than character cell terminals have.
pretty sure that's a display simulator written for DOS machines
archive.org
That looks like something from parallel universe.
It even got these Unix abbreviations... or soviet ones? Soviet Unix abbreviations!
Self-documenting applications and proper multitasking are generally preferable in use cases where computers are a tool and accessory to the job rather than a lifestyle or central to your career.
>because Kevin Flynn couldn't exit vim.
I laughed harder than I should have
it's not even a valid uname string though considering it has two architectures and they obviously just vomited a bunch of shit in there to make it look technical
that's from TRON isn't it
Yeah.
that can't be true
how did gnome and gtk work before 2004 then
they're not even right, iirc the timer in the scene was exactly correct
we need a wayland compositor like this
Before Xorg it was XFree86, a different X server implementation. The switch happened since XFree86 did some license fuckery that made it nonfree as I recall.
The 80386 came out in 1985 but it took a year or so before machines using it became available. Some early steppings had bugs that broke some 32-bit mode stuff, they got stamped "16-bit only" and sold to cheap clone makers.
so that's why a bunch of stuff is named xf86
Early VR. Many thought you could enter the volcano, in reality you could not.
these were moderately cringy imo
When the entire world is the interface:
You're thinking of fsn on IRIX. It was a lot better and more usable than any 3D file manager available for Linux.
The original Star Wars arcade cabinet was like this. Totally awesome!
I think Compaq was the only company to use the 386 before 1987 when everyone else started finally throwing it into their high-end machines.
I think this GUI is originally made by Soviets parallel with development of Buran spacecraft, there was book available online about it some decade ago but I can't find it anymore. It really looks like something from alternative future.
It is but it looks like real thing.
>Soviet Unix abbreviations!
>Soviet Unix
So would that OS be the...
Unix of Soviet Socialist Republics?
soviet tech could have been awesome if they didn't run out of money
I approve of our new Commiepunk overlords.
Fucking Airbus.
Why Soviets NEVER had home computers, that anyone can afford?
because you don't own anything under communism. it's pretty self-explanatory.
github.com
Yeah baby, we made the UI from tron real! It just need to be more usable tho
What a fucking fags.
Russia could have been IT shithole, like India or US, but no, it is simply a shithole
They didn't run out of money under communism, it was under capitalism