Why is Google allowed to censor?
Other urls found in this thread:
fuck off kike
why not
>infowars
Even if this information is true using faulty sources discredits the information
>Why is Google allowed to censor?
why would you give them access to all the western degeneracy?
>Even if this information is true using faulty sources discredits the information
hello CNN
Genetic fallacy, the source of the information does not determine if an argument is true or false.
the better question is: why is google allowed to exist?
because google hires a lot of liberals
5 yuan has been deposited to your WeChat (Tencent) account
>infowars.com
kill yourself magapede
t. brainlet
Apple literally links to HuffingtonPost articles on their apps.
the absolute state of zoomers
Hahaha GIDF is all over this one.
Infowars is more reliable than CNN or the NYT.
Cause they want to stay in the country?
Would be hard to explain to market why you lost 150 million of potential botnet members.
>why is a private company allowed to decide what shows up on their sites?
t. libertarian retard
That's not even a libertarian viewpoint retard
>Infowars is more reliable than CNN or the NYT.
Imagine being this fucking delusional.
Pathetic
back in the good ol days CIA would have taken the google CEO behind the shed for this disgrace
I'm still waiting for my gay frogs. The supplements they sell really work tho, I'm a full B cup now after taking their Alpha Male T-Booster.
It's their platform, they're allowed to ban whatever they want from it. You might not like that, and that's fine, but it doesn't change the fact that that;s how private property works.
t. GIDF
>infowars
rip
>crush dissent and control free thought
Sounds a whole lot like what they’re doing in the West, nothing inconsistent going on.
The CIA benefits from the USA having strong enemies. Nobody in the US government is asking questions as long as they think they need the CIA to do whatever it takes to "defend the free world".
>infowars
oh to be this young and innocent again
>all the data and media ain't
>infowars.com
Post discarded.
Post a real source next time.
>infowars.com
>infowars.com
cringe
>samefagging this much
>his samefag detector is broken
based nigger
almost
>Why is Google allowed to censor?
They're not "allowed", they're required by these nation's laws.
Nations have their own laws. In one, excessive violence in image and maybe also text form is banned, in the other CP, in the next regime critique [or maybe just caricatures of government officials and monarchy?], and in some you can't show genitals or whatever.
I bet you accept some of these as normal too. There are moral arguments for and against all of these, but I'm not sure companies should make it their business to change nation's laws, it's usually actually not a good idea [even if they might have the power to get what they want].
>Infowars
>infowars
You all laugh at jones but the gay frogs are real
youtube.com
alex jones is literally the protector of this timeline
How many babies has google sacrificed to satan?
half of the future ones
Obviously you've triggered a base/root npc response, they can't even pretend to have a different thought. Interesting.
Free thought bad
Restricted thought good
shut it down
some shills got a lot of ips under their control
I work at Twitter in Boston. Our floor worships Alex Jones because we all agree with everything he has to say about our platform and the goals of technology corporations in general.
America doesn't have laws on the book forbidding companies from such unethical practices. It doesn't really matter since foreign governments will just block out companies that don't want to play ball with them. You'd be restricting to just domestic markets.
Friendly reminder that corporations like google are literally sovereign states
>inb4 muh use of force
economic force is force ayn rand shitsuckers
they should be treated like the nests of tyranny they are and destroyed
Also, reminder that market regulation is what created them, and deregulation is what is necessary to destroy them.
Corporations are chartered by, supported by, protected by, and work for and with governments. They are not a part of the free market at all.
>all these retards freaking out over Infowars
Kicking the shit out of MSM and doing real journalism.
it's part of the NPC programming that freedom of the press is bad
>Muhh private comapny
Except if it's starting to censor shit you use right ?