Such is the state

Such is the state

Attached: sy32ui39iqf21.png (1920x1080, 546K)

muh gayming

Attached: comment_qbvNyMLGHqjJU406hQz3g4dgUQMij8vC.jpg (200x300, 27K)

and it's worst with the RTX 2080 lmao

Attached: 1549831423662.png (1920x1080, 494K)

>1TB of bandwidth losing to 448GB of bandwidth

MUH HBM MEME

7% slower than RTX2080 @ 1440p

5% slower than 1080ti @ 1440p

The sum total of all Vegas, 56/64, on Steam is 0.01% higher than the 2080ti alone.
2 cards, midrange and high-end together, released in August 2017, are essentially tied with a single insane halo product that cost over 1k released over a year later.

At least it's on the chart now. Devs have no doubt already started on those primitive shader implementations.

Attached: 5375b7fa-0621-4280-a794-09949d463d92.png (924x164, 13K)

>get 123 fps instead of 148 in fortnite
Who the fuck cares?

Why would anyone buy anything over RX 590 from seethers known as AMD?

people that play graphically intensive games

>Performance doesn't matter

pretty sure most of those cards got bought up by miners

>get 100 fps instead of 120
>get 80 fps instead of 100
>get 60 fps instead of 80
>get 40 fps instead of 60
>get 20 fps instead of 40
>get 0 fps instead of 20
LITERALLY WHO CARES LMAO
this is your brain on AMD

Attached: noooooo amdbros this cant be happening.png (1135x792, 98K)

It's more like amount the games Nvidia was able to influence with sponsoring vs amount of games Amd was able to influence and Nvidia has much more money and influence.

Oh boy, another thread showing how underwhelming a defective MI50 is performing. Jesus fucking Christ are you people retarded. Go back to

if you think nvidia actually gives game developers money you are a total brainlet, they just have better features and apis so developers choose to use them especially since 90% of their customers have nvidia cards and the remaining 10% are used to being cucked already

>blame nvidia for amd fail

I'm increasing convinced no one does, and these threads are just nonsense shitposts.

Why dirt 4 is so fast?

>World of Tank HD client
>World of Tank enCore
the fuck is the difference? I can imagine how hard shillware shitboxed was trying to look for those shitty games

there's a Twingo in the car list

While i wouldn't actually say to ignore it in a real decision between the 2, it is interesting the 4 biggest 'wins' for Nvidia are ones where you are likely already at 100s of FPS so the difference doesnt matter.
Wonder what the overall % difference is with those not included.

They give "incentives" to prospective developers and publishers if they implement proprietary feature x". AMD RTG does the same thing to a lesser degree.

Nvidia give them developers to work on the game implementing their features. Its not giving money, but free development the game company doesn't have to do is saving them money, so essentially Nvidia is giving them money.
Also pretty sure its closer to 80%-20%

>24% slower than Nvidia for WarFrame
ABSOLUTE DISGRACE

Attached: d3cfb60.jpg (1600x1121, 246K)