THE WHITE MANS ETERNAL SYSTEM

4670+660

Literally kept me going for 5yrs. Even still played most things in 2017 fine. Upgraded to 1060 and it chews through everything

athlon xp 2600+
radeon 9500pro

what dreams where made of

I have a 3770k+r9 390. It burnt down my house twice but with proper airflow it's not too bad.

My 15W laptop CPU is about as strong as that CPU.

OK kid

I use a 1950X and a 1070.

Attached: 1547088756385.jpg (1200x1028, 200K)

The true GOAT.

OK kid

Attached: IMG_20190212_202455.jpg (1080x1949, 319K)

>2011
>2017
Woah who knew processors get more efficient over time

So stop recommending outdated trash

not op

Not in real applications, even with HT it's barely much better

cлaбый дoлжeн бoятьcя cильнoгo

Attached: 1542153994509.jpg (600x931, 130K)

>barely much better
That was kinda the point. It's approximately equal.

It’s not trash if it does its job quite well.

But it literally doesn't.

t. retard

Attached: UPGRADE2010.png (836x768, 17K)

E8400 + 3870

You're just buthurt that a sub $100 used PC paired with a 1050ti can run any contemporary game just fine

Q9550 + 750TI

Attached: 1549061733406.png (981x984, 315K)

I have this exact setup.
Doesn't seem worth upgrading, cpu single core clock hasn't gone up enough, and AMD's radeon 7 is underwhelming.
Anything else costs too much.

2500K with a GTX580. GPU lasted 3 years. CPU lasted 5.5 years. If I had a 2600K I wouldn't have upgraded yet.

>AMD power draw
>AMD thermals
>mfw the only time ATi/AMD hasn't been housefire tier was 2008 to 2011

Attached: 1531499790942.jpg (709x595, 156K)

AMD FX-6300 overclocked to within an inch of its life & Radeon 7950 (with 7970 flash BIOS)

>If I had a 2600K I wouldn't have upgraded yet.
Do those extra threads really make a difference? I doubt it. I mean, I still run a 2500K myself, but I don't really see the performance difference being significant. 3770K maybe.

Dis nigga gets it.

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 18K)

This

>970 trash
Only niggers fell for the 700 series memes (except 750ti)

I like my 970 but a card that was advertised as 4 GB and ended up being 3.5 GB will never be legendary.

Yes. They do. A 2600K OCed to 4.5gorillionhurtz is around a 8400. Also if you matched that 2600k with 2133mhrz ram you had absolutely no reason to upgrade. Wouldn't bottleneck anything below a 1080ti/rtx2080

>FX
Haslel is a better legacy platform with cheap DDR3

I have a 960 2 GB. Fine card though it's definitely showing its age on newer games.

underrated
i had 9800gt tho which was retarded as it turns out cuz hd4870 and hd4850 were already out
but i was young and stupid
never bought novideo after that.
absoutely based

kek
based
havent seen this in like 15 years ytmnd days

>Fine card
>completely destroyed by its competitor in modern games

I do have a 1050ti desktop as well, but I'd be pretty sad if my thinshit laptop would be as strong as my desktop CPU-wise. In fact it did overpower my old desktop, which sucked especially as I was running Gentoo at the time and my laptop would barely benefit from distcc compared to its own respective older equivalent.

970 gets trashed around by 290.

700 series were a better deal than AMD cards for a while because of crypto miners buying everything.

wouldn't a 2500 bottleneck the R9?

Attached: serveimage.jpg (1200x800, 287K)

>AMD gpoo
no

This

Nice. I could have never afforded that system when it came out, but I got it used from my father to replace my pentium IV. The 8800 broke pretty soon though, I got a 460 instead and OCd the Q6600 to somewhere around 2,9 GHz. Used it until 2015.

That's not 4790k + GTX 980

So pentium 4 was not a housefire compared to an athlon 64?

Attached: 51638084_2231272083605531_8167496593906335744_n.png (719x720, 315K)

ryzen 1700/1700x/1800x + vega 56/64

u got it backwards mate
>fx8350 + gtx 1070

a backdoor-free powerhouse CPU (as in uses a lot of power) and a price-performance GPU for muh gaymes

Attached: 1319398941712.jpg (407x286, 12K)

>r9 290
>phenom 6x 1090t, a shit one at that, can't even hit 3,7ghz when everybody reports "4ghz ez oc bro"
fuck my lyfe
thank god new ryzens are coming in hot

I have the same dilemma. Maybe navi will be decent. The new ryzen look promising too, maybe they'll force Intel to up their game too.

depends on how you're clocking that chip. Phenom II's were able to be more easily clocked when fucking with FSB more so than just regular multiplier. But FSB manipulation is a pain in the ass. I helped get my buddy's golden chip Phenom II X4 965 to 4.2GHz like that. (Granted we got it to 3.9GHz on multiplier alone)

>Name a more iconic duo
Watch this, nigga.

Attached: combo.png (1595x961, 790K)

Don't know why my quality is ass but that's the motherfucking 8350 with the 7970.

Attached: 1411230601710.jpg (1162x778, 126K)

>FX
>smart

Imagine supporting such a shit platform. Does Jow Forums really need a refresher in how trash bulldozer was?

i5 9600k and 1070

Attached: 02-Louis_Tully_GB2.jpg (750x750, 100K)

A platform so trash that its single core performance was slower than Phenom on release. Literally ate power on load, cooked everything in site AND cost more than a 2500K on release

I came here to post this.

*comes in the following year and dominates for less than 200 dollars*

Attached: amd_fx8350_8_core_cpu_1504700744_6b25d1e40.jpg (826x818, 173K)

>R9 290
>not 7970
underage

This, an overclocked 7970 will put out heat like a 290 and come close to it.

what the fuck does this have to do with being white

R5 2600 + RX 580

A nigger would ball out with the hardware and a white man would get stuff that offers the best price to performance.

He would also write his own compiler.

>iToddlers btfo

Attached: smug looking anime girls with condenscending looks on their face.png (181x220, 27K)

Kek, we're calling the intel users iToddlers now whenever they get btfo by Intelaviv.

i5-2500k @4.5GHz and GTX 660 Ti @1.3GHz

>Q6600
I miss that

*gets shit on so hard that they have to sell their flagship product for pennies*

Imagine shilling for such a universally canned product. I get being an AMD fan. But I don't understand being a bulldozer/piledriver fan, it was such a trash product.

>GTX 660 Ti @1.3GHz
How are you not on fire? My Sapphire Dual-X OC 7970 that hits 1GHz with the power limit cranked up puts out a shit ton of heat this winter which is cool but it's alot.

Attached: You versus the card he doesn't tell you about.jpg (2576x1932, 1.85M)

I'm not a fan of the bulldozer FX-8150 because it clocks so poor, but the 8350 is a great fucking chip that they should've released in 2011, even Lavcopricetech said the FX-8350 was pretty decent and they fucking hated AMD FX and shilled for Intel, the 8350 was just that decent.

case fans from 3 sides, still kepler power management will only run in that frequency if there's headroom in temperature.

Based kepler, shame the high end 600 series has only 2GB of frame buffer, but if you have a custom card with 4Gb of RAM, you can actually be alright.

>Just that decent

Lmao even you don't say it's good hahhaha

It's just decent for gaymen but for my multicore needs is awesome.

>Intel CPU + onboard Intel graphics
>Name a more iconic duo, I'll wait
Literally never had a discrete GPU, still don't need one

i just got off lga 775 a couple days ago, thank you very much.

intel has best linux drivers too

Attached: 1540316596973.jpg (330x483, 64K)

youtube.com/watch?v=IghcowGhRBc

3.5 GB

Pentium 4 + ATI Radeon 9800 Pro

Attached: Unreal_Tournament_2004_Coverart.png (256x359, 185K)

My 6600K and Fury Nitro

>when we already have intool

Attached: Intool.png (937x581, 161K)

Damn that's bretty good,

> Iconic
32MB TNT2 Ultra + Dual 3Dfx VooDoo2's.

>6 cores 6 threads

Literally gonna be obsolete next year when AMD shits on it lmao.

This, people laughed at AMD with the moar cores approach, but you need moar cores now to stay relevant.

R5 1600/2600 + RX 580

almost

Attached: ss (2017-01-05 at 01.46.21).png (458x392, 21K)

Intel is and always has been a Jewish company with a very Jewish corporate culture. There is nothing "white" about it whatsoever.