dev.to
>While most content-blockers are indeed efficient, they are not equivalent and we observed that Ghostery performs consistently as well or better across all dimensions, often surpassing other libraries.
dev.to
>While most content-blockers are indeed efficient, they are not equivalent and we observed that Ghostery performs consistently as well or better across all dimensions, often surpassing other libraries.
>The filters used to determine whether or not a request is to be blocked are the ones from Easylist, where we removed all the cosmetic rules before running the benchmarks.
enjoy your broken layouts
Ghostery is literally spyware
Yes goy, use OUR adblocker instead. It works great
>adblocker financed by ad companies blocks least amount of ads the fastest!
This
AHAHAHA Ghostery fags are delusional
This.
OP is a faggot as always.
ghostery is not open source.
uBlock Origin is still better, more ethical, as it just hides the ads from the website instead of not downloading them. This way the websites that display ads get money because the advertisement companies think that you saw the ads. Of course, downloading the ads then hiding them takes up more resources, this is why it's slower, but still, properly blocking the ads is literally a theft from websites' owners. So use uHide Origin my friends, thank you.