/dpt/ - Daily Programming Thread

What are you working on, Jow Forums?

Last thread:

Attached: BPS.jpg (853x480, 198K)

Other urls found in this thread:

scanlibs.com/functional-programming-c-improve-techniques/
leetcode.com/problems/k-closest-points-to-origin/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming
p.Jow
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

double compile!

Attached: 1548990183441.jpg (583x580, 78K)

Reminder that pointers are not arrays, and that C is poorly designed because it erroneously conflates the two concepts.

Reminder that Trump knows more about technology than anyone, which includes all of Jow Forums.

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (474x315, 20K)

assembly itself is actually easy
there are only so many opcodes
the challenge comes from doing anything worthwhile with it

programming is a form of magic and not technology

This is the kind of code that people who shit on OOP write.
typedef struct {
unsigned long pix;
XftColor rgb;
} Clr;

typedef struct {
Cursor cursor;
} Cur;

typedef struct {
Display *dpy;
int ascent;
int descent;
unsigned int h;
XftFont *xfont;
FcPattern *pattern;
} Fnt;

typedef struct {
Clr *fg;
Clr *bg;
Clr *border;
} ClrScheme;

typedef struct {
unsigned int w, h;
Display *dpy;
int screen;
Window root;
Drawable drawable;
GC gc;
ClrScheme *scheme;
size_t fontcount;
Fnt *fonts[DRW_FONT_CACHE_SIZE];
} Drw;

typedef struct {
unsigned int w;
unsigned int h;
} Extnts;

/* Drawable abstraction */
Drw *drw_create(Display *, int, Window, unsigned int, unsigned int);
void drw_resize(Drw *, unsigned int, unsigned int);
void drw_free(Drw *);

/* Fnt abstraction */
Fnt *drw_font_create(Drw *, const char *);
void drw_load_fonts(Drw *, const char *[], size_t);
void drw_font_free(Fnt *);
void drw_font_getexts(Fnt *, const char *, unsigned int, Extnts *);
unsigned int drw_font_getexts_width(Fnt *, const char *, unsigned int);

/* Colour abstraction */
Clr *drw_clr_create(Drw *, const char *);
void drw_clr_free(Clr *);

/* Cursor abstraction */
Cur *drw_cur_create(Drw *, int);
void drw_cur_free(Drw *, Cur *);

/* Drawing context manipulation */
void drw_setfont(Drw *, Fnt *);
void drw_setscheme(Drw *, ClrScheme *);

/* Drawing functions */
void drw_rect(Drw *, int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int, int, int, int);
int drw_text(Drw *, int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int, const char *, int);

/* Map functions */
void drw_map(Drw *, Window, int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int);

Totally NOT seeing an OO pattern here, right?
Also
>abstraction
>abstraction
>abstraction
Are they trying to convince the reader that those "abstractions" are effective, or themselves?

Attached: 1523336729860.png (549x560, 258K)

The kernel is full of badly coded manually managed OOP. Cniles are the biggest hypocrites.

This, and anyone who denies this is nothing but a contrarian autist who tries too hard to look smart on a Mongolian forum.

Linux does use lots of OO methodologies, but that code is from dwm, a community which actively condemns OOP.