UN Wanting to ban some H content

oneangrygamer.net/2019/02/u-n-proposes-initiative-to-ban-loli-shota-and-underage-drawings-and-cartoons/77229/

ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRC/Pages/DraftGuidelinesOPs.aspx


SOOOOO, UN is wanting to ban loli and all the other mumbo.. This is getting ridiculous. There are enough issues around the world and they suddenly decide to enforce something as mundane and irrelevant as this?

Attached: main-qimg-8e9f8e74afb8b3d1d9b5690cac321bbf.png (602x602, 216K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ungm.org/Public/Notice/83577
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

clearly the UN prefers 3D

Drawings shouldn't be illegal. It's hard to take a stance on because you'll be though of as a perv. Who is going to shut this down?

Who cares about pedos

what the fug

Attached: machi anrgy.png (771x720, 867K)

They won't be able to enforce it. Have you seen how difficult a time they have stopping or preventing human trafficking? Imagine them trying to expand that, but now there's no physically trackable subject, it's all just dudes uploading cartoons to the internet

funny, their workers keep getting caught raping real kids, but they wanna ban drawings
they can fuck off

>mfw they are coming for the SS

Attached: angry anime girl screaming at computer thinkpad.jpg (1280x720, 358K)

Especially considering how even religion is a pope as the cardinals seem to have raped nuns in the Vatican

Cartoons which are legally created and sold in Japan. If it's a world wide ban the supply will be much much lower.

?

Attached: ebd21d4096e5734529ad13a2dab74c87.png (220x147, 2K)

It will go down like the whale hunting ban:
Japan will still be allowed to make loli porn for research purposes.

joke* not pope*

Ah, the censorship machine coming for the people I hate most in this world.

Pedophiles and people who like anime. Well done UN.

Pornography in general should not be as freely available as it is. It's like we want boys to get distracted by something...

>implying this will do anything
It's already technically illegal in many places but nobody actually cares.

>UN
>Doing anything

Attached: 1547159910099.png (904x401, 646K)

Fuck the UN, I'm moving to Russia.

Shouldn't the UN be dealing with important real life stuff instead of censoring the entire media world?

Attached: xpgbok.jpg (1024x658, 120K)

Lurk more
>hint

Attached: original_drawn_by_sky_freedom__7cf624ed18eac23ff3acbb82474ddcc9.jpg (705x1000, 125K)

Is it still lolicon if loli few centuries old?

Attached: Monogatari (Series) - Oshino Shinobu Render 17.png (689x862, 325K)

They won't ban it in Japan.

My own "booru" (I haven't decided a name for it yet, just codenaming it MyGallery) which will compete with sankakuchannel and rule34hentai will be hosted on a Japanese web host and uses a JS applet for rotation-supporting rectangular mosaic censors (these coordinates are stored in the database too) which uploaders can apply on the genitals during the upload process and be displayed on top of images, on GIFs (multiple coordinates by frames) on HTML5 (multiple coordinates by timecodes). JS is required to be turned on to view explicit images. I'm not wealthy so it will be funded transparently via donations, probably mostly through BTC and LibrePay, I'm not stupid enough to use Patreon or Paypal they will kick me off for sure. I have written a few simple bandwidth scale-back emergency scripts in which only heavily-compressed JPG previews can be displayed to users, and daily file-view limits by IP address if it gets really bad, when I'm not able to fully pay the hosting bill. I hope to deploy a beta this year.

I hate loli even beyond the obvious issues, it makes me conflicted as whether to uphold it based on freedom of speech or to ban it for the obvious pedophillic intent. It's like having both your parents get a divorce and you like them both

Basically every time kiddy drawing ownership has been prosecuted across the world, punishment was either heavily reduced in court or it was tied to real life child porn ownership, so it didn't matter. The worst they do is threaten image hosting sites like that r34 site. So that's what we should worry about.

Why the censoring, for Japanese laws? Will the uncensored images be downloadable?

Why would you want stuff for others that don't affect you in any way?
People who like loli don't go around raping little girls irl, same goes for people who like weird fetishes like braps, feet and even hands. They don't around killing people to taste satisfy their fetish.
Would you like it if I banned your favourite game or song just because I think it's has degenerate values?

Attached: 1448405951346.jpg (245x296, 57K)

You are aware of the fact that client-side js offers you no control on how the images will be displayed?

Because pedopillia is a mental disorder and feeding into it is enabling. It's the same reason I don't think trannies should chop their cocks off.

best girl

If pedopillia is a mental disorder, then being gay, a tranny or liking anything other than a white blonde 21+ christian girl should be considered a mental disease.
Until then, you have no rights to call anything a metal disorder.

>If pedopillia is a mental disorder, then being gay, a tranny or liking anything other than a white blonde 21+ christian girl should be considered a mental disease.
Yeah I would probably have to agree with that. Only pedophiles defend pedophiles.

Well, if drawing or fapping to a drawing is gonna get you in jail, that will make pedophiles going for the real deal, given that the punishment is the same.

Yes you can. I use document.createElement() to display images marked as explicit.

I'm not a pedophile, I'm just defending the creative freedom of artists.
Banning drawings of fictional characters is a sign that something's completely wrong with our current society.

But should we ban trap H because of the mental affects it might have?

Ok, thanks for confirming that you have no clue.
Protip: userscripts

Don't bother replying.

>I'm just defending the creative freedom of artists
Maybe you are, but I have had inumerable experiences where self-identified pedophiles attempt to use this line of thinking, you're among very bad company

How is this a bad thing for anyone that isn't a closeted pedo?

you are retarded

they do and still do. hundred of different kinds of initiatives, some useful some not so much.
but as more and more "woke millennial" enter the UN bureaucracy they will fund useless programs like gaming studies. Look at this one, they probably throw ~$8,000 at a focus group for gamers:
ungm.org/Public/Notice/83577

The UN is getting into gaming. I saw another notice where they want to fund mobile games development.

I'd rather be on the side of some autist who faps to loli than some shitty christfaggot trying to censor what's left of our internet freedom.

Attached: CoGjiw.jpg (1921x2025, 788K)

Pedophilia can be a mental disorder while loli and shota are still allowed.
Also no use defending a right that will be completely revoked within 20 years.

No, I'm just tired of pedophiles becoming increasingly brazen over time because of liberal faggotry

I'm not a christcuck though

>Pedophilia can be a mental disorder while loli and shota are still allowed.
Not according to normalfags

Then why do you care if people fap to japanese drawings of little girls? How does that affect anyone in the real world?

you are a pedophile

Because having a sexual attraction to something that is morphologically a child is a clear indicator of pedophillic intent.

>Why the censoring, for Japanese laws?
penises and vaginas are required to be censored to at least some extent

>Will the uncensored images be downloadable?
yes you just have to manually save the images. i may have to block googlebot and yahoo slurp so the direct images aren't displayed on their search engines to reduce risk of an angry japanese law enforcement agency / web host.

that should read $80000

the intent doesnt matter, i could argue with you about whether or not loli/shota makes someone a pedo but until there is ACTION which involves a VICTIM there is no crime
if you dont make that distinction then fifty shades of grey is as good as illegal and any porn involving a schoolgirl outfit is also illegal and pedophilia

So by your logic, shooting people in a video game is a clear indicator of terrorist and violence intent.
See how dumb this logic is?

Attached: wilson.gif (300x300, 2.86M)

You misread my post. I never said I'm modifying any images. Censors are applied on top. It is only for viewing. I am testing to see if it satisfies their law.

Not him, but the logic of sexual attraction doesn't apply to what you find fun in video games. If someone fapped to drawn scat porn would you not say they were attracted to shit?

That's a false equivalency. Humans are programmed to find only late adolescent and onward females attractive. Masturbating to what is essentially a child could only be done by someone who has an attraction to children.

>OAG
Can you not spam your links on /v/ and here. Also UN can not do anything. They declared the Internet as a human right but nothing has happened. Nobody cares about the UN.

That doesn't mean they'd fuck shit in real life.

Anything under 18 or somtimes more in some places is considered pedophilia. If you agree with this then you're not allowed to ever post a girl under that age ever again without being called a pedo.

>Jow Forums
>pro pedo shit
>Jow Forums
>anti pedo shit

Why do so many discord trannies hang out at Jow Forums?

You're conflating posting a picture of a child with posting one of a child in a sexual situation. I in fact think you are a pedophile, because that lack of distinction can only come from someone with a severely damaged idea of what is appropriate and what isn't.

yes you are plus you are a terrorist

Maybe in jest, but unless they want it irl, no.
I like anal is drawing, but not in real life or in real porn.

I never said that. You can be a pedophile that never comes close to touching a child but you're *STILL* a pedophile because you're attracted to children (drawn or real). It won't do anyone harm if you are but it's not a fact you should share publically or parade around like it's somehow socially acceptable.

I think you're fucking retarded.
>lack of distinction
But that's literally what you do when you put people who fap to loli and real pedophiles together

>you're *STILL* a pedophile because you're attracted to children (drawn or real).
Again, you people are putting everyone in the same bag. This is the exact same retarded logic that they used when they tried to ban violent games because they thought people would grab a gun and start shooting people irl because of them.

Is this illegal? I don't want to get v&

Attached: Screenshot_20190217-212109_Chrome.jpg (1080x2220, 870K)

>Pedo
Define it. Do you mean attraction to a 2D image that is lines on a page, writing on a book or do you mean really 3D females that are underage?

REEE PEDO REEEEEE UN UN PLS BAN THIS GET THIS MAN BEHIND BARS RIGHT NOW REEEEEE

sure thing, pedo

Attached: 1538247651666.gif (351x398, 113K)

Russia is part of the UN

>has breasts
>age 8
Great fail pedofag

I said that finding children sexually attractive in drawn or real form is pedophilia, which is an objectively true statement.

funnily enough i think the whole SNIIIFFFFFFFFFF thing, at least somewhat, shows a counter to that, it didnt matter the intent or type of photo, if there were thighs, ass, armpits or any body part of the person that particular user wanted to sniff (jokingly or not) it was posted
tldr
pretty much anything can be sexual, if the person makes it sexual in their head.
dunno if you heard about those youtube streams Jow Forums got shutdown but the 'viewers' were telling the children to do shit like 'do a ballé twirl' and it became clear that from the chat, it was sexual, however the children didnt know and at a glance it seemed innocent enough

>Posts an underage girl according to his retarded logic

That drawing is clearly an 8 y/o gilr.
Congrats, you're officially a pedophile according to the UN logic.

Attached: 1459875496954.jpg (150x150, 13K)

People on Jow Forums being extreme degnerates and creating weird fantasies based on inoccuous images is one thing. I'm saying that posting a regular picture and posting a sexual one has two different motifvations

Congrats, you're not just a pedophile, you're a retard

>oppai loli
Disgusing desu.

She's not naked or having sex though is she, pedo? She's just laughing at you for being a disgusting kiddie diddler!

Fuck off pedo, I bet you have real life child abuse video in your HDD while you attack loli posters.

Attached: 1444216857669.jpg (1406x925, 315K)

ROAMING
RAPE
GANGS

>finding children sexually attractive in drawn or real form is pedophilia, which is an objectively true statement.
Then you can not differentiate from Fiction and reality. Also if you want to have people thrown in jail because they like drawings or books of that nature then you are an authoritarian.

>person defends loli
>makes comments indicative of a pedophile
Like poettering

Attached: IMG_942.jpg (1600x1200, 144K)

>Swimsuits aren't sexual
There's literally an entire section of "pedophilia" dedicated to them on these "pedo" manga of yours.
This is literally what you're defending, are you just baiting or are genuinely retarded?

Be prepared then to not watch Kobayashi Maid Dragon Season 2 when it airs.

UN trying to criminalize thoughts, color me surprised.

holup

>The HeForShe Initiative

what the fuck is the HeForShe Initiative?

Is being authoritarian a bad thing? I'd make Stalin look like an anarchist.

Attached: 1549919586479.jpg (1280x720, 438K)

>s hard to take a stance on because you'll be though of as a perv

That's because their real endgame is criminalizing memes and political cartoons.

>Children are sexual
ok, pedo

>He has pictures of little girls in swim suits saved on his HDD
Keep getting BTFO pedo.

reported

Weapons that you use against the populus can be used against you. IE hate speech in Europe. Having freedom is the closest thing to a better society anyways.

where the people are doesnt matter, my point was that the motivations dont really matter, because your motivation to take a nice picture of your wife to hang in the living room might be my motivation to take the same nice picture, fantasize sniffing her thighs and humping her leg like a dog, all from the exact same picture.

As much as it pains me, I agree with you glowies on this one.

nice trips

I'll have you know it's an SSD.
Freedom is the best because then I can have child sex slaves amirite?

>trips

It's painfully obvious that you are real life pedophile.

>slavery
>freedom
imagine being this retarded

>ARE

is capitalized, it must be real.

>111
>not trips

Good thing you have company then!
Complete freedom would include the freedom to own slaves. Of course, the slaves would have the freedom to escape, but then I have the freedom to shoot them in the head. FREEDOM!

Attached: 1520047527468.jpg (616x707, 190K)

It was quads you aspie, look again.

Okay pedo, keep falseflagging like a retard.

yes authoritarianism is bad, what you think is right and the one true path or whatever may be true for you, however it will not remain that way, look at the twitter lefties, they have segregated themselves and constantly infight and get kicked out of their communities because its all or nothing, with their ideologies switching and their authoritarian methods getting them and everyone around them exiled. thats just within their own communities, people who were at one point 'good'. look to alex jones, milo, gab, vid.me and anything more right leaning than mao to see what they think of people who are 'evil'