Indias average IQ is below room temperature (80), so knowing this. Their populace probably doesn't have the intellectual property to assume intelligence.
>C++ TATORIAL
>ELLO DU U WONT 3 CUMPUTAH CORSE
>VIRIAL INFACTION, DU DIS EN PEY HUNDED POHNDS OR DALLAH
Just fucking annoying.
Other urls found in this thread:
dash.harvard.edu
youtube.com
twitter.com
room temperature is 20 degrees, you dumb fuck.
Lynn's data is shit. I don't know his sources for India, but a lot of his African IQ data is old colonial tests to justify occupation or made up by him with no supporting data.
>room temperature (80)
Room temperature is 20-25.
You're wrong. Lynn uses good data. Even African scholars use Lynn's data. It's his detractors who use cancerous data:
Wechsler did all sorts of mental gymnastics to inflate the African score and he could only inflate it up to low 80s. He used 1930s standards for tests taken in the 1960s. He admits that the Flynn effect hasn't been observed in Africa, and even if you applied the adjustment, it would lower the IQ, not raise it. Hence, his decision of not applying it, i.e.: he did whatever favored Africans.
He threw away valid IQ tests for the dumbest reasons like a place not being geographically in Sub-Sahara Africa, even though it's inhabited by black Africans.
He excluded dozens of valid tests for 'not appropriate CPM norms for adults'. Instead, he relied mostly on school grades which is even worse. His aforementioned usage of older standards than appropriate is also much worse.
>You're wrong. Lynn uses good data
He made up data
>Even African scholars use Lynn's data. It's his detractors who use cancerous data
Wrong
>He threw away valid IQ tests for the dumbest reasons like a place not being geographically in Sub-Sahara Africa, even though it's inhabited by black Africans.
And Lynn threw away data in Sub-Sahara Africa because the scores were too high. His data is absolute shit and the GDP and HDI growth of African nations left alone reflect that
there's nothing wrong with female armpits.
Evolution gave up on 'Merica.
Congo / Zaire
IQ 74
Kashala et al. 2005
Ethiopia
IQ 70
Ayalew, 2005
Gambia
64
Jukes et al., 2006
Gambia
60
Jukes & Grigorenko, 2010
etc.
The idea that Lynn only uses ancient data, or that somehow modern IQ tests show Africans scoring a lot higher and Lynn is ignoring it doesn't stand to scrutiny if you spend more than 10 seconds to check his sources.
>he made up data
He calculated 64 national IQs based on neighbors (and obviously didn't hide it) for his 2002 book because the data didn't exist. Ever since, 41 of those 64 estimates were replaced by actual scores in his 2010 book (and all his estimates were proven to be spot on)
Here's the deal. Assuming 20% of Indians are smart, 20% of 1.35 billion is 270 million smart people. There are 126 million people in Japan, so there are around 2 smart Indians for every dumb nip like hiro. That is amazing.
Now that you got destroyed on your lies about Africa, let's move on to India. His sources for India are basically mostly Indian researchers.
India 88 Gupta & Gupta, 1966
India 87 Chopra, 1966
India 81 Sinha, 1968
India 82 Rao & Reddy, 1968
India 84 Majumdar & Nundi,
India 79 Mohanty & Babu, 1983
India 78 Agrawal et al., 1984
India 79 Afzal, 1988
India 86 Bhogle & Prakash,
India 82 Jyothi et al., 1993
India 82 Raven et al., 1996
India 80 Barnabus et al., 1995
India 88 Raven et al., 2000
India 81 Raven et al., 2000
Jukes
You mean the tests that specifically picked children effect by malaria? Those IQs are accurate for those sick kids and were never supposed to represent the general or healthy population you goddamn liar. Jukes even goes on to slap down Lynn's work.
There are no African scores that are too high. There is a guy that contorted facts all he could and only managed to inflate the IQ of Africa to 81-82 (using school grades instead of IQ tests)
>Now that you got destroyed on your lies about Africa
Nice didn't happen kiddo. You're a retard and a dubious faggot
dash.harvard.edu
No malaria
People bitched about Lynn's estimates, but time proved them wrong when those places got actual scores.
You're getting curbstomped though.
So much (You) goin' on in this thread
Based
This one is your worst one. Most of the data is from white Europeans with a very small sample of Africans. This is dumber than 0 white men raped black women because of a 10 person poll.
Nice try though. I know all of your tricks
That's cool but unnecessary. Twin studies already proved the heritability of iq, finding the genes is just a obfuscation used by fact-resistant ideologues. Guess what, they'll still ignore facts if the genes are found.
Forgetting that most of the grey parts ALSO say aluminium
>Twin studies already proved the heritability of iq
That one was debunked as well especially since a lot of the twins weren't even far apart. Some of the twins were simply next door to each other and had basically the same upbringing and interaction.
>Most of the data is from white Europeans with a very small sample of Africans
It would only be relevant given two conditions:
- If all the data was from white Europeans (it isn't, there are over 30,000 Africans)
- If the African nervous system worked in a completely different way (if you admit this, you already conceded far more than you wanted)
Can someone make me a map?
Countries that play football with their feet vs countries that play football with their hands.
exterminate niggers
Debunking is running your own twin study and getting counter-results, not making vague and weak criticism that might or might not apply to some of the hundreds of twin studies.
You lost
The results of the Digit Span test indicate that linguistic factors bias
test scores for some populations. This is one reason why the analysis of IQ scores across
populations and countries (Lynn & Vanhanen, 2001; Rushton & Jensen, 2005) is unlikely
to constitute a valid comparison.
Our results also have implications for the argument that the reported mean IQ in
sub-Saharan Africa of around 70 (Lynn, 1991) is a causal factor in these countries’ low economic productivity and that differences from IQ levels of Europeans and Asians are
“largely genetically determined” (Lynn & Vanhanen, 2001, p. 431).
>- If the African nervous system worked in a completely different way (if you admit this, you already conceded far more than you wanted)
How did you jump to this conclusion when I said the data for Africans was too small
>there are over 30,000 Africans
vs millions of Europeans
Got any proof?
Oh of course you don't. Your kind only ever pokes holes and discredit actual science. Your Kind only ever tries to obfuscate.
You probably don't believe in truth anyways.
>10 person poll
Imagine calling the Criminal Victimization Survey elaborated by Bureau of Justice Statistics a "10 person poll" because you don't understand what the footnote actually means
The guy that gives Africans the highest score still gives them 81-82. Even if Lynn is completely wrong (he isn't), and you go by the best estimate, it's still shit.
300,000 white Europeans
There is no point in asking this board.
They are legitimately under average IQ. Many of them are probably poo niggers.
Stay mad wh*te boy. Indians dominate tech and medicine. All your companies are going to India too.
Looks like the band camp girl from American Pie
>The guy that gives Africans the highest score still gives them 81-82. Even if Lynn is completely wrong (he isn't), and you go by the best estimate, it's still shit.
The average IQ with a large demographic of sick and malnourished people with infrastructure not reaching various villages isn't perfect? Wow great job. They also highlight the importance of testing in the mother tongue and how it impacts scores, something they weren't always able to do.
>300,000 white Europeans
millions, nice try though
I work with Indians and 99% of them are completely retarded. They are only hired to be low cost slaves. How does that feel, to come from retarded poo slave land?
Just stay the fuck out of America.
It's not even the average IQ. It's a number he made up from school grades.
and?
These results were calculated using 916 genetic variants associated to cognitive ability found through MTAG and GWAS analyses of 222,543 cohorts from the UK Biobank
Not millions. And you should know that it doesn't even matter because this is a GWAS study on genomes, but I am just humoring you because you're wrong anyway.
That he threw away all the negative data, used the best cherrypicked data, even invented scores from school grades, and only managed to inflate it to low 80s.
>abloobloo but africa is shit, of course they have low iq
they have low iq, of course africa is shit
I don't care about what OP posted other than it's related to retarded poo niggers.
They are unbelievably stupid and posses zero "rare expertise" or any Western values. They should not be allowed into our country.
>How did you jump to this conclusion
if the African nervous system worked the exact same as the European nervous system, it would not matter if the genetic sample is European or African - the fact that we need diverse genetic samples comes from the fact that they work differently
also, even if they do work differently, and you drown the African sample with a trillion European samples, GWAS will still find the variants that make Africans smarter even if they don't do anything to Europeans, they will not be magically hidden
In fact, here are some that were actually found that only favor Africans and do nothing for Europeans:
rs73058705 A
rs11637716 T
Just for the record. You made me dig up the files.
>10 person poll
46,580 black women that were raped were interviewed
Fewer than 10 answered that they were raped by white men
That's what the "based on 10 or fewer..." footnote means