GTX 1660 Ti priced at $279

This. Why would you buy one when the performance is close to a 1070 with the leaks that are out and the 1070s are still in stock AND has more VRAM? GDDR6 really isn't going to make that much of a difference.

Attached: file.png (1081x573, 224K)

>India flag color palette on the webpage
What did they mean by this?

Attached: images.png (275x183, 2K)

>The GPU performed slightly better than GTX 1070 and every so slightly worse than GTX Titan X, offering the users an alternative with decent performance at a much lower price. While the $279 price is listed, some people have reported much higher prices at online retailers, with €321 / $363 on Amazon.de before the page with the leak was removed.

Attached: aKCAW5x.jpg (796x805, 119K)

>6 GB

Attached: 1510897963070.gif (400x250, 1.98M)

the rtx2060 is $350 so the pricing issue should resolve itself

what a fucking scam

Stop with this meme. It's a 1080p card and should last you the entire next generation console.

Nvidia will have to start significantly selling below MSRP soon considering how badly their sales has tanked due to crypto crash and AWS/Azure/GCP telling them to go fuck themselves with "lol firmware ungimped card branded as Tesla costs 20x what GTX with same performance costs."

>he brags about getting deepthroated by nVidia

Keep dreaming
Nvidia doesnt have to do jack shit

SEETHING

Untill Navi that is.

I can still buy RX 570 8GB for $149

My RX580 8GB was $179, but whatever helps you sleep at night.

I need to run FakeApp so that I can put this one e-celeb's face over a gay porn, so I need something that supports CUDA.

Anyone who is fanboying a company that is supposed to rip you out of your cash, is just a massive fucking imbecil. You buy this stuff because you have to - to use it for media consumption - not because you want that company to grow (but if you do, then congrats u r retetetetarded). Most normal people buy the best efficiency for the lowest cost. Sometimes it's AyMD, and other times is noVidia, this is how the market works. So yeah, fanboys are cancer - on boths sides.

Attached: brainlettttt.jpg (800x450, 44K)

Who fucking needs this slow gayming piece of shit?
True men uses professional GPUs

>pay 4 times the price for same performance when you don't even need ungimped features like virtualization

For literally what purpose would you use that

>Almost as expensive as the 2060
>Performs worse than it and doesn't have "muh RTX" meme.
The most "why?" GPU release in years.

>he's happy to pay $279 for this shit
good goy

You're also forgetting the used market, which is STILL full of ex mining GPUs. So if you're willing to possibly repaste an miner GPU, then you can get one for an absolute steal!

Source: Paid $295 USD including shipping for an EVGA 1070 TI FTW2

what gpu would you guise buy if you didn't have any to play games?

asking for myself as i don't have any

Attached: 23.jpg (384x392, 48K)

How much of a performance increase would that be from my 970? I'd gladly buy into this scam if it's a good one.

Did I wake up from a coma? The fuck is that series number?

>he doesn't need virtualization
>he doesn't have racks of CPUs and GPUs in his basement connected into one cluster
haha, why would you larp as a poor man, user?

...

RX 550, 560 or 570, depending on what I'd do.
No need to spend any more than what those GPUs cost if you're not a gamer.

thanks for the reco. even with the upcoming new gpu's those seem like a very reasonable choice might go for a 570 or if within reach 580

Attached: 1481461680656.png (430x304, 40K)

IGPU

Used 10 series card

>550, 560
There's no point since 570 is costs the same

>2019
>not using RTX for FP16

Attached: 1_sq7uZfe1Vd0C0XjsoLCSYw.png (719x375, 17K)

Delusional. Games will be using much more than 6GB when the next-gen consoles come out, and the idea of somebody still playing at 1080p in 2025 is fucking hilarious. I guess Nvidiots were the poorfags all along.

Jokes on you I bought a vega 56 for 300.

570 isn't as low profile, 570s suck up more power.

That said, a rx 570 can run older and lower profile games with ease, and many newer games on lower settings.

>literally worse than shitx 2060
>having any significant sales whatsoever
jesus christ, you are in for a wild ride, mr huang. good luck.

Since this is about GPUs ill ask this here

looking into getting a new laptop.

For Professional Work and Gaming.

Are the RTX cards worth it ? or should i just stick to the GTX 10 series ? and or these new coming cards 1660 etc

I dont have any real need for anything above 1080p

Is this a real post? Do you really think and talk like this?

he probably does

just one of those people that think the only games that exist are those AAA games that push the limits to look like real life and have more explosions and special effects then a michael bay movie

Gtx is fine, you'd be hard pressed to go stress them.

>Nvidia doesnt have to do jack shit
They guided flat for 2019 so of fucking course they do.

Yep, keep dreaming
They will sell 1660s and Tis by the boatload

>2 months pass
>Nvidia 1666 TiTty
good goy

That's why they guided the entire year flat, right?

why would that be because of consumer cards?
mongoloid

>why would that be because of consumer cards?
Because gaming is over 50% of the entire revenue.

xx60 series
280 fucking buckaroos

what the everlasting shit-fuck?

and which segment do you think is only a fraction of that 50%? (hint: RTX)
nvidia simply over-estimated crypto, automotive and other meme-learning booms

Big revenue source but relatively low margins. Tesla, Titan, Quadro, and Tegra Drive products have lower revenue pull but very high margins. Profit warning has more to do with AWS and Azure slowing down further GPU purchases from Nvidia due to exorbitant Tesla pricing.

obviously the solution is to bump all the other cards up by 75$

>and which segment do you think is only a fraction of that 50%? (hint: RTX)
Gaming is gaming.
>Big revenue source but relatively low margins
Both high revenues and high margins.
>Tesla, Titan, Quadro, and Tegra Drive products
Out of this only DC revenue counts for something.
Their automotive biz might as well not exist, flat for many quarters now.
>Profit warning has more to do with AWS and Azure slowing down further GPU purchases from Nvidia due to exorbitant Tesla pricing.
DC purchases are ramping again H2 for all the relevant vendors, but Nvidia guidance is still flat.

>wahhh I desperately want to be right on an anonymous imageboard

>arguments

Used 1060

>i9 9900k

Christ, that thing is a supercomputer. Why are you getting the best of the best when you could get something a little lower?

It's better than 3.5gb.

>tfw bought a 980Ti at launch
>Tfw still pushing modern games
>70+ fps in Metro Exodus on high present with Hairworks and PhysX on
>85+ fps in Far Cry New Dawn on ultra with some settings knocked down to high (shadows, foliage)
>70+ fps in REmake 2 on highest settings minus a little bit of AA

All at at 1440p on a 165HZ G-SYNC panel. Fucking card refuses to be irrelevant. I'll probably end up keeping this card even when I move onto 7nm Ryzen.

>tfw i bought a GTX 970
>i fucking hate it 3.5gb woodscrews

they both get fucked on decoding video however

>tfw monitor so old that if i buy a new card i HAVE to buy a new monitor

Attached: 1439489796849.gif (320x180, 1.49M)

Agree. Bought pic related for about $400 couple of weeks ago, did some dust cleaning, changed the thermal grease, changed the fans for 2x120mm PWM. Works like a charm.

Attached: Palit-GeForce-GTX-1080-Ti-Super-JetStream-1-740x391.jpg (740x391, 44K)

Attached: nvidiot.jpg (796x805, 84K)

I still play at 1360x768 and don't plan to change for higher
High framerate > Resolution

Well the current 1060 6gb already has trouble averaging over 60 fps in some games at max settings. Maybe it won't hold up next gen.

>Both get fucked on decoding video
What do you mean?

Didn't those repair costs bring you over budget?

Nothing too do with the Vram idiot

RETAILERS BTFO !!!!!

Maybe. Maybe not.

Attached: when_she_sees_your_dick.png (233x194, 84K)

No.

Maaaaaaybe.

You're so c-cute, user.

My full time job is video editing and it's 25% faster than the 8700k I'd love to go lower but I can't pass up on 25% render and export times. The part I'm stuck on is GPU do I go for a 1160, 2060 or 1060 my budget is £200-£300 I only play a few games and they all run on shit hardware so it's purely for video editing

AYYMD is losing at every tier in performance and power consumption and AYYMDPOORFAGS are SEETHING and MAD AS FUCK

Well the 2060 is expensive because it has the RT cores dedicated to raytracing. All the 20 series GPUs have this tax. Currently, the RT cores are not used by any video editing software. So avoid the 20 line to get more value. That leaves you with the 1160 or the 1060. I can't decide that one for you.

STFU faggot if you don't know shit

Turing is much faster than Pascal in video editing

pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/DaVinci-Resolve-15-NVIDIA-GeForce-RTX-2070-Performance-1264/

Maxwell series (except GTX 960) cant hardware decode VP9, nor HEVC

Getting deepthroated is a good thing user

Those are numbers for machine learning programs.

NO, FAGGOT

They're not, Turing shaders are much faster than Pascal shaders for video editing, the benchmarks pretty much shows it

lmao imagine paying 279$ for 2050ti
they only named it 1660ti because they KNOW that their consumers can't connect 2 dots

Da Vinchi is the only company even trying to get it to work. Other companies, notably Adobe, have no support for the new cores of rtx cards. Sorry for truth bombing you but an anons money is at stake here.

Are you fucking retarded? Probably yes, seeing how your dumb whore mother dropped you on the head

xx50 Ti GPUs are under 150mm2 die size, this is over 200mm2 die size

You don't even know what you're talking about

DaVinci Resolve currently doesn't use Tensor or RT cores, this is pure CUDA cores/shaders and Turing is much faster than Pascal as the benchmarks show, something you can't seem to understand even in simple English

how much onions do they feed you for damage control

I'm thinking of buying mining gtx1080 bought in January last year.
Does your card work fine and how much risk is there?

That's just plain slander, user. Dollar of dollar, the GTX series offers superior value for video editing. This is almost entirely down to the exorbitant expense incurred by the addition of RT cores in the RTX series.

Fuck off faggot

The benchmarks don't lie and smart people will buy Turing GPUs for superior video editing performance

People want to do things faster and more efficiently and they'll buy superior Turing GPUs, not Pascal and there's nothing you can do about it

You neglect to mention that you have no benchmarks that are not machine learning programs run by DaVinchi.

>3GB
Not a single fuck is given.

Good one that, I grabbed it for 125€ and I can say it was worth it. Just a little hot, this specific model.