Modern browsers absolutely assblasted by 30yo CERN browser:
>worldwideweb.cern.ch
How to load a page:
Document > Open from full document reference
How to follow links: just double-click
inb4 https links don't work, you don't need that gay shit.
inb4 I need to type www, that is how it is supposed to be you lazy cunt.
Other urls found in this thread:
what a fucking pile of shit. for that much javascript, and obfuscated, it does absolutely fuck all except display some gay windows. pure cancer.
>pictures are not displayed
>error when clicking on "post a reply"
Yeah that's fast, and then? It's useless
Lame. At first I thought it was a javascript emulation of the whole NeXT machine with the browser installed on it. Now that'd be cool.
I remember compiling Mosaic on Linux tho. That bears a much higher resemblance to modern browsers than this.
>inb4 https links don't work, you don't need that gay shit.
Where the fuck are these newfags coming from?
>69877630
>fucks all
Maybe because modern web pages are full of unnecessary garbage.
Then why don't you implement a CERN browser compatible imageboard?
Here is the second browser, this time it's a terminal version
>line-mode.cern.ch
>It's useless
Web pages back then didn't have images and the cancer that is JavaScript had not been invented.
The web was simpler, less cluttered, more useful, and just better.
Minimalism >>> functionality.
Images were added in Mosaic (1993)
Nothing shows up on the screen when typing stuff, only the typing sounds. Is it supposed to be like that? Pressing enter just refreshes the page.
So I don't need images? Ok. Create a text-only board then. Or I don't need the ability to upload stuff either?
Those are called textboards. Jow Forums used to have a textboard called /prog/. Some textboards like /news/ allows the OP only to upload an image.
t. zoomer newfaggot
the web was worthless back then, USENET, IRC, email and FTP were the only useful services
Yeah, and they can't be accessed on this piece of shit browser because it probably doesn't support POST requests.
Don't get me wrong I know the modern web is bloated, but saying this was better than modern web browsers is some retarded bait.
just use links2, lynx, elinks, etc.
>Minimalism >>> functionality.
>inb4 I need to type www
Don't all good websites implement a proper redirect anyway?
But you can...
,o.----.-----.oo.
d8P=.:::.;;;::.`88b.
/'.'. \:/ . `---:_;-|-
,-'.....v:..........:_.'-.
/,-;.....|:..........`-;:\ \
|' /'....:;::.........|\:.|'|
'|| ..::/ `:::......|\::.| '
|::\|.:/--. \|\|\-\.;\:::.`.
.':::\\|'.-=\ ` \=-.,;:..:.|
||::::/\'``9; 'P/,"|)__ .|
|'.:::(`| `- ; --' // \_'
.'.. :::`| / .( )
||..:|.::` `__ ,( , +
|'..:`.|..`. `=' |-; `.
.'..:..|.|..:`. .'. \| `. /O/.
.|..:...`..\:::' -- |.:...:.`.~ `.
/'..::_.--'--/' :. `.\;;;;::|\ `.
-' |.:;'..\ |._ / ,'--:_`. `.
/|./ |...`. \ -.' ,'...../- :. `.
| |.' |/....`-. \ _.'_..'.....,' ..`: `.
\| |'.....|_`.\'-' /..... /. . ' `: `.
' |......-''/+|\ \....../. .','. .
/ .'......\-'/,| \/.....| . /.'|.\: |
, |........|//.' |......' . ' | .` '
| `-.__ . .|`|| |__ .-| . |==.__._/
| ` |:::::::| || |::::::' ; `::::|
' \ |::::::| `' |:::..| . _.- |:::'
/ \ |..:::| .'|::..| ___,-'`-. |..|
`-. \/:....|.' /...:|-' / `. | /
\ `:;;;;;\_||:./;| | `-/
)--==|O `-`---\---'
Does it support POST requests?
URL redirection was added in HTTP/1.1, which is from 1996.
The 1986 version of HTTP only supported GET.
No. GET only.
Wait, CERN? Aren't they the ones working on time travel?
>dumps user into trash can
>https
>"you don't need that gay shit."
OP confirmed for retard.
Then how are you going to upload your posts?
I'm looking at an HTTP 1.0 spec here that lists 301. Am I factually retarded?
It's actually possible, because HTTP/1.0 was not a formal specification, and there were multiple implementations of it in the wild. There was an RFC published but it was only informational.
A bit later HTTP/1.1 was published, merging all those versions.
I'll just keep using K-Melon on Goanna, but thanks anyway.
El. Psy. Kongroo.
>it's a windows tard doesn't know that there are minimalist browsers thread
durrr
w3m -> doesn't need X, can display images in the framebuffer
links -g -> can display pages in an almost usable manner in the graphical text mode
vimb, luakit, surf -> minimalist and fast browsers that are actually usable
Are you serious?
>vimb, luakit, surf -> minimalist and fast browsers that are actually usable
Require webkitgtk so not minimalist
>w3m -> doesn't need X, can display images in the framebuffer
>links -g -> can display pages in an almost usable manner in the graphical text mode
none of which can be used to post here without a pass, because they don't render Google's noscript captcha correctly
>minimalist and fast browsers that are actually usable
t. somebody who has never tried different browser on a slow pc
changing the UI that's slapped onto webkit or gecko barely affects the responsiveness at all. in fact a lot of the time these browser are slower because nobody has taken the time to find the best compile time options for the average system.
Yes. Unless they support uploading form parameters through GET URLs (probably not), but that's a retarded hack anyway.
you dont NEED futures and functionality you stupid normies
>none of which can be used to post here without a pass, because they don't render Google's noscript captcha correctly
And?
They're both better browsers than the one OP posted already. That's the whole point.
>t. somebody who has never tried different browser on a slow pc
t. never used the browsers I mentioned. I run them on a x61 and they're lightning fast.
minimalist as can be with modern choices. durrr.